HomeMy WebLinkAbout10 Report 02-185 Updated Info re J.H. Putman PS, Lakeview PS and Riverview PS (Cumberland)�S
0
ML
OTTAWA-CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mery Beckstead, Supervisor
28 October 2002
RE: Report No. 02 -185 to the Board/ Supervisor -
Updated Information Pertaining to J.H. Putman Public School, Lakeview
Public School and Riverview Public School (Cumberland)
ORIGINATORS: Ronald K. Lynch, Director of Education (Interim)
Bonnie Viney, Coordinating Superintendent of Corporate Services
Michael Carson, Manager of Facilities, Planning and Transportation
PURPOSE.
1. To provide the Board with updated information with respect to the possible closure of J.H.
Putman Public School, Lakeview Public School and Riverview Public School (Cumberland).
BACKGROUND:
2. In Report No. 02 -182, titled "Elementary Board -wide Area Review /School
Accommodation Review Process', staff noted that the consolidation of space would assist
in achieving efficiencies by reducing operations and maintenance costs and, therefore,
recommended that J.H. Putman P.S., Lakeview P.S., Lamira Dow Billings E.S. and
Riverview P.S. (Cumberland) be closed effective September 2002.
3. On 14 May 2002, Board approved the closure of one school, Lamira Dow Billings E.S.
4. On 14 May 2002, Board also approved the redirection of those students who would
normally attend grade 6 at Agincourt P.S. to J.H. Putman P.S. effective September 2002,
thereby alleviating the over - crowding at Agincourt P.S. and increasing the utilization
factor at J.H. Putman P.S.
5. On 27 August 2002, it was determined that 11 pairs of elementary schools (in addition to
the one existing twinning) would share a principal beginning in September 2002 as part
of budgetary measures. Of these schools, Riverview P.S. (Cumberland) was "twinned"
with Fallingbrook Community E.S. and Lakeview P.S. was "twinned" with Bayshore P.S.
6. At the Board meeting of 10 October 2002, the following motions were approved:
A. THAT the Board reconsider the decisions of 14 May 2002 with respect to J.H.
Putman, Lakeview and Riverview (Cumberland) schools; and
B. THAT staff be directed to provide an updated report to the Board no later than
28 October 2002, with respect to the possible closure of J.H. Putman, Lakeview
and Riverview (Cumberland) schools, effective September 2003; and
C. THAT the following public Board meetings be scheduled to allow the Board to
hear delegations and make its final decision on 16 December 2002 regarding
school closures for September 2003:
*28 October 2002 — To receive staff's updated recommendations.
*2, 5, and 10 December 2002 — To hear delegations from the affected schools and
community.
(Tentative: 12 December if required)
*16 December 2002 — Final decisions re: school closures for September 2003.
And;
A. THAT the Elementary Area Review/ School Closure process outlined in
Appendix C of staff report No. 02 -182 to the Board/ Supervisor be approved; and
B. THAT staff be directed to develop options that would result in an overall
utilization of between 90 -957o Inside the Greenbelt; and
C. THAT staff be directed to identify potential school closures Outside the
Greenbelt as well.
6.1 As indicated in report no. 02 -182 dated 10 October 2002, the Board -wide process
will be required to identify the potential closure of between 2,000 and 3,000
elementary spaces.
6.2 It is important to note that, without further consolidation of space, the Board will
not be able to generate sufficient funds through the Grant for New Pupil Places
(GNPP) to deal with the backlog of required schools, schools required for future
new growth or existing schools requiring major enhancements.
a��
7. In accordance with the direction approved on 10 October 2002, the following motion is now back
on the table:
T.H. Putman Public School
(i) Close J.H. Putman Public School, effective September 2002;
(ii) Redirect J.H. Putman Public School grades 7 -8 Early French Immersion to Fisher Park
Public School;
(iii) Redirect J.H. Putman Public School grades 7 -8 English to Pinecrest Public School;
(iv) Remove J.H. Putman Public School/ Pinecrest Public School grades 7 -8 English "option
area" and direct all grades 7 -8 English students to Pinecrest Public School;
(v) Relocate General Learning Program (GLP) and Special Support Unit (SSU) system classes
currently at Pinecrest P.S. to Fisher Park Public School; and
(vi) Relocate the Primary Assessment Centre (PAC) system class currently at Pinecrest Public
School to Century Public School.
Lakeview Public School
(i) Close Lakeview Public School, effective September 2002;
(ii) Redirect JK ENG, SK -5 EFI program students from Lakeview Public School's attendance
area to Bell's Corners Public School; and
(iii) Relocate the Language Learning Disabilities system program currently at Bell's Corners
Public School to Bayshore Public School.
Riverview Public School (Cumberland)
(i) Close Riverview (Cumberland) Public School, effective September 2002;
(ii) Redirect Riverview JK -8 ENG program to Trillium Elementary School;
(iii) Redirect growth area, East of Trim Road, to Fallingbrook C.E.S. for JK -8 ENG /EFI.
Pupils currently attending Riverview Public School residing within this area be permitted
to attend Trillium E.S. and be provided transportation in accordance with applicable
Board policies.
STATUS:
8. Appendix I attached, provides updated information from staff's original report dated
26 March 2002, for J.H. Putman P.S., Lakeview P.S. and Riverview P.S. (Cumberland).
9. Based on the information contained in Appendix I, staff would like to highlight the
following:
9.1 The status quo projections and utilizations (part D of the 26 March 2002 report)
for Riverview P.S. (Cumberland) and Lakeview P.S. that were previously
developed by staff are still valid. In fact, overall, enrolments for these three
schools have declined. See section 1 for details.
9.1.1 The following table compares the enrolments projected in the 26 March
2002 report to the preliminary 30 September 2002 enrolment.
School Name
26 March 2002 Proj.*
30 Sept. 2002 Enrol.
J.H. Putman — Gr. 7 &8
188
179
J.H. Putman — Gr. 6
0
86
Lakeview
149.5
146
Riverview
(Cumberland)
79
67.5
*Enrolments shown for 26 March 2002 represent AIDE.
* *Enrolments shown are based on preliminary figures for 30 September 2002 and
represent ADE.
9.2 Preliminary 30 September 2002 enrolment for grade 7 -8 at J.H. Putman P.S. is
comparable to the projection generated by staff for the 26 March 2002 report. See
section 1 for details. In addition, there are approximately 70 grade 6 students
who were redirected from Agincourt P.S. to J.H. Putman P.S. effective
September 2002.
9.3 The financial impact of the proposed closures was shown in Appendix C in the
26 March 2002 report. This information has been updated as section 3 in
Appendix I. It should be noted that the potential savings from the closure of J.H.
Putman P.S., Lakeview P.S. and Riverview P.S. (Cumberland) are substantially
lower due to the "twinning" of both Lakeview and Riverview (Cumberland)
schools.
9.4 Section 4 of the information package provides updated information on the
community use at each school (previously shown as Appendix E — 26 March 2002
report). Statements made in part H of the 26 March 2002 report are still
applicable based on the information contained in the chart.
9.5 Updated attendance boundary maps are provided in section 5 of the information
package (previously shown as Appendix F — 26 March 2002 report). The updated
maps reflect the Board approved motion to redirect the grade 6 students from
Agincourt P.S. to J.H. Putman P.S. effective September 2002. In addition, the
maps shown on pages 7 and 8 of the 26 March 2002 report have been updated to
reflect the redirection of grade 6 students from Agincourt and are contained in
this section.
10. Currently, students from Agincourt P.S. are directed to J.H. Putman P.S. for grade 6.
Should J.H. Putman P.S. close, effective September 2003, approximately 70 students
(current Grade 5 — 2002 -2003) would remain at Agincourt P.S. for September 2003.
11. Should the Board wish to proceed with the closure of J.H. Putman, Lakeview and
Riverview (Cumberland) schools, an amendment to the main motion (in report no. 02 -080
dated 26 March 2002) will need to be made to reflect the following:
rfjwmj
11.1 a closure effective September 2003 instead of September 2002; and
11.2 the attendance boundary for Agincourt P.S. incorporate grade 6 English and
Early French Immersion programs.
12. Staff realizes that the motion to reconsider was based on the need to identify operating
savings as soon as possible, as referenced in the Rosen report. However, a significant
portion of the savings will be achieved if "twinning" of schools is continued for
2003 -2004.
12.1 Staff feels it would be more appropriate to consider the potential closure of these
schools in the context of the Board -wide review. At that time, these options and
others could be considered.
12.2 It should be noted that, in the event these closures are not implemented for
September 2003, the Board will be required to find alternate savings as it will
continue to incur the costs of approximately $209,000. as illustrated in section 3
of the updated information package.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. THAT the recommendations noted in Report No. 02 -080 dated 26 March 2002, with respect to J.H.
Putman P.S., Lakeview P.S. and Riverview P.S. (Cumberland) be withdrawn at this time.
B. THAT the possible closure of J.H. Putman P.S., Lakeview P.S. and Riverview P.S. (Cumberland) be
reviewed within the context of the Board -wide elementary area review process approved by Board
on 10 October 2002.
��/, / �W�
A",ea
�onald K. Lync
irector of Education/
Secretary of the Board (Interim)
Bonnie Viney
Coordinating Superi ndent of
Corporate Services
0-51 -13D
OTTAWA- CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
APPENDIX I
Updated Information From Original Report
Dated 26 March 2002.
Facilities and Physical Planning
28 October 2002
0
ot 1�1
OTTAWA-CARLUON
DISTRICT SCHOOL SOARD
SECTION 1
Actual and Projected Enrolments and
Utilizations of affected Schools
Facilities and Physical Planning
28 October 2002
Mai
SECTION 1
Recommended Closure of T.H. Putman PS
Actual and Projected Enrolments and Utilizations of affected schools
i) Status Quo projections and utilizations
School
Cap.
Port.
02/03
Grade/
Program
ADE
01/02
OF
( %)
FTE
02/03*
OF
( %)
ADE
03/04
OF
( %)
ADE
06/07
OF
( %)
J.H. Putman PS
361
0
6-8 ENG /EFI
180.0
49.9%
265.0
73.4%
284.0
78.7%
297.0
823%
Fisher Park PS
844.5
0
7-8 ENG /EFl /ALT
519.0
61.5%
497.0
58.9%
469.0
555 °k
516.0
62.1 %
Pinecrest PS
549.5 1
1
1 JK -8 ENG
48225
87.8°/.
1 455.5
82.9%
460.5
83.8%
410.0
74.6%
Centu PS
473.5 1
0
JK-6 ENG
425.75
89.9%
1 364.5
77.0%
406.5
85.9%
4025
85.0%
Agincourt PS -
498
1
JK -5 ENG /EFI
56250
113%
1 480.5
96.5% 1
471.5
94.7% 1474.5
953%
* Is based on 30 September 2002 Full Time Equivalent (FTE).
ii) Impact of the Recommendations on "receiving" schools' projections and utilizations
School
Grade,/
Program
ADE
03/04
OF
ADE
OF
Fisher Park PS
7 -8 ENG EFI ALT
609.0
721 %
656.0
77.7%
Pinecrest PS
JK-8 ENG
525.5
95.6%
481.0
87.5%
Century PS
JK-6 ENG
416.5
88.0%
4125
87.1%
Agincourt PS
JK-6 ENG /EFI
540.5
1 108.5% 1
550.51
110.5%
F]
28 October 2002
/�3
SECTION 1
Recommended Closure of Lakeview PS
Actual and Projected Enrolments and Utilizations of affected schools
i) Status Quo projections and utilizations
School
Cap.
Port.
02/03
Grade/
Program
ADE
01/02
OF
( %)
FTE
0$/03*
OF
( %)
ADE
03/04
OF
( %)
ADE
06/07
OF
( %)
Ba shore P.S.
632.5
0
JK -5 ENG /SK -5 EFI
453.25
71.7
436.5
69.0
446.5
70.5
411.5
65.1
Bell's Comers P.S.
519
0
JK -5 ENG
386.5
74.5
371.0
71.5
368.5
71.0
350.5
675
Lakeview P.S.
220
0
JK ENG, SK -5 EFI 1
154.5
1 701 1
146.0 1
66.4
1 137.5
162.5
J 120.5
1 54.8
' Is based on 30 September 2002 Full Time Equivalent (FTE).
ii) Impact of the Recommendations on "receiving" schools' projections and utilizations
School
Grade/
Program
ADE
03/04
OF
%
ADE
OF
Ba shore P.S.
JK -5 ENG /SK -5 EFI
457.5
72.3
4225
66.8
Bell's Corners P.S.
JK -5 ENG /SK -5 EFI
495
95.4
460
88.6
A
28 October 2002
SECTION 1
Recommended Closure of Riverview PS
Actual and Projected Enrolments and Utilizations of affected schools
i) Status Quo projections and utilizations
School
Cap.
Port.
02/03
Grade/
Program
ADE
01/02
OF
( %)
F rE
02/03*
OF
( %)
ADE
03/04
OF
( %)
ADE
06/07
OF
( %)
Riverview
229.5
Fallin brook
JK -8 ENG
87.5
38.1
67.5
29.41
103.5
45.1
176.5
76.9
Meadowview
252.5
2
JK-6 ENG /EFI
260
103
244
96.63
256.5
101.6
322.5
127.7
Fallin brook
521.5
1 2
JK-8 ENG /EFI
535.25
1 102.6
1 819.5 1
99.62 1
488 1
93.6
1 437
1 83.8
Maple Ride
644.5
3
JK -8 ENG /EFI 5-6Gift
569.25
88.3 1
650.5
100.9
712
110.5
946 1
146.8
Trillium
644.5
JK -8 ENG /EFI /LFl
525.5
81.5
1 519.5 1
80.61 1
499 1
77.4
1 515
1.79.9
is vasea on su Septemoer 2uu1 t•uu time tquivatent (,FM.
Should the East of Trim Road growth area not be directed to Riverview for JK -8 ENG and
Meadowview for SK -6 EFI, these schools are projected to have the following enrolments:
School
Cap.
Port.
02/03
Grade/
Program
ADE
01/02
OF
( %)
FTE
02/03*
OF
( %)
ADE
03/04
OF
( %)
ADE
06/07
OF
(%)
Riverview
229.5
Fallin brook
JK -8 ENG
87.5
38.1
67.5
29.41
79.5
34.6
76.5
33.3
Meadowview
252.5
2
JK-6 ENG /EFI
260
103
244
96.63
236.5
93.7
239.5
94.9
- is vases on su September 2002 t-uu Time tqutvalent (I-M.
t).
ii) Impact of the Recommendations on "receiving" schools' projections and utilizations
School
Grade/
Program
ADE
NVO 4
I OF
%
ADE
07
OF
Riverview
CLOSED
Meadowview
JK-6 ENG /EFI
236.5
93.7
239.5
94.85
Fallin brook
JK-8 ENG /EFI
535
102.6
637
122.15
Maple Ride
JK -8 ENG /EFI 5-6Gift
709
110.0
929
144.14
Trillium
JK-8 ENG /EFI /LFI
578.5
89.8
591.5
91.78
28 October 2002
F]
0
•
M_j
OT AWA-CARLFTON
DISTRICT SCHOOL SOARD
SECTION 2
City of Ottawa Sub -Area Utilization
Elementary
Facilities and Physical Planning
i
3�
28 October 2002
The Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
Summary of Elementary Panel Utilization by City of Ottawa Sub -Areas
�l.J
Clifford Bowey & Crystal Bay OT 315.0 1 315.0 172-5 1 54.8% 1 184-75 58.7% 184.0 58.4% 131.
Elementary Panel Total 163 51,829.0 46,415.5 47,339.25 1 91.80% J 47,146.25 1 90.5% 46,419.00 89.6% 5,410.0
Notes:
(1) Planning Capacity is for 2002/03 school year and includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
(2) MOE Capacity is for 2002/03 school year and is based on capacity used to calculate Grant for New Pupil Places Eligibility (GNPP).
(3) Utilization factors (UF) have been calculated using that particular year's Planning Capacity.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations. H
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures. ~
n/a indicates that there are no schools located within the sub -area
N
4W (W (W
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Sub -Areas
P
Planning
Capacity
(a
MOE
Capacity (2)
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003 (Sept 30)*
ADE
OF ( %) (3)
ADE
OF ( %) (3)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %) (3)
+/_ PP
Alta Vista
Bayshore
Beacon Hill
Cedarview
Central and Inner
Hunt Club
Merivale
Ottawa East
Ottawa West
10
2
3
6
2
8
3
0
8
5,630.5
1,755.5
1,979.5
3,932.0
3,897.5
4,215.5
4,691.5
2,261.5
4,602.0
5,630.5
1,755.5
2,208.0
3,932.0
4,007.0
3,754.0
4,692.0
2,261.5
4,602.0
5,220.25
1,412.25
1,724.75
3,644.00
3,204.25
3,852.50
4,177.50
1,998.00
3,722.25
92.7%
80.4%
78.1%
92.7%
80.0%
91.4%
89.0%
88.3%
80.9%
5,162.25
1,357.75
1,637.45
3,517.75
3,335.30
3,751.25
3,782.00
1,952.50
3,762.25
91.7%
77.3%
74.2%
89.5%
83.2%
89.0 °k
80.6%
86.3%
81.8%
4,980.00
1,306.50
1,596.00
3,355.50
3,332.50
3,669.00
3,735.00
1,919.00
3,736.50
88.4%
74.4%
80.6%
85.3%
85.5%
87.0%
79.6%
84.9%
81.2%
650.5
449.0
383.5
576.5
565.0
546.5
956.5
342.5
865.5
Inside the Greenbelt Sub Total
42
32,965.50
32,842.5
28,955.75
86.4%
28,258.50
84.9%
27,630.00
83.8%
5,335.5
EUC East (Cumberland)
EUC West (Gloucester)
11
9
2,545.5
2,199.5
1,801.5
886.5
2,280.50
2,022.25
89.6%
84.4%
2,310.25
1,891.75
90.8%
79.0%
2,315.50
1,813.50
91.0%
82.5%
230.0
386.0
Leitrim
Rural Northeast
n/a
2
n/a
482.0
n/a
482.0
n/a
371.75
n/a
77.1%
n/a
347.50
n/a
72.1%
n/a
311.50
n/a
64.6%
n/a
170.5
Rural Northwest
6
1,554.0
1,285.0
1,501.75
116.9%
1,502.50
116.9%
1,469.00
94.5%
85.0
Rural Southeast
13
1,383.0
1,383.0
1,512.00
109.3%
1,506.75
108.9%
1,455.00
105.2%
-72.0
Rural Southwest
11
2,119.5
2,119.5
2,037.25
%.1%
2,133.00
100.6%
2,108.00
99.5%
11.5
SUC East
SUC West
Stittsville
n/a
6
11
n/a
3,013.5
1,043.5
n/a
1,500.0
1,043.5
n/a
2,378.00
1,248.00
n/a
104.7%
119.6%
n/a
2,791.75
1,216.00
n/a
92.6%
116.5%
n/a
2;820.50
1,224.50
n/a
93.6%
117.3%
n/a
193.0
-181.0
West Urban Centre North
West Urban Centre South
27
25
1,309.5
2,898.5
1,285.0
7,472.0
1,864.50
2,995.00
142.4%
103.3%
1,911.50
3,092.00
146.0%
106.7%
2;022.50
3,065.00
154.4%
105.7%
-713.0
-166.5
Outside the Greenbelt Sub Total
121
18,548.5
13,258.0
18,211.00
102.7%
18,703.00
101.2%
18,605.00
100.3%
-56.5
Elementary Sub Total
163
51,514.0
46,100.5
47,166.75
92.0%
46,%1.50
90.7%
46,235.00
89.8%
5,279.0
Clifford Bowey & Crystal Bay OT 315.0 1 315.0 172-5 1 54.8% 1 184-75 58.7% 184.0 58.4% 131.
Elementary Panel Total 163 51,829.0 46,415.5 47,339.25 1 91.80% J 47,146.25 1 90.5% 46,419.00 89.6% 5,410.0
Notes:
(1) Planning Capacity is for 2002/03 school year and includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
(2) MOE Capacity is for 2002/03 school year and is based on capacity used to calculate Grant for New Pupil Places Eligibility (GNPP).
(3) Utilization factors (UF) have been calculated using that particular year's Planning Capacity.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations. H
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures. ~
n/a indicates that there are no schools located within the sub -area
N
4W (W (W
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
ALTA VISTA
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools /additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003•
Year
Planning
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
Built
Capacity
Program
JK-8 ENG
Alta Vista
1947
0
730
SK -8 EFI
567.50
77.7%
559.00
76.6%
563.00
77.1%
7-8 LFI
Arch St.
1959
0
336
JK-6 ENG
269.25
80.1%
282.00
83.9%
280.00
83.3%
JK ENG
$ayview
1951
0
302.5
SK-4 EFI
213.75
70.7%
211.75
70.0%
228.00
75.4%
Charles Hulse
1954
1
549.5
JK-6 ENG
543.75
99.0%
552.75
100.60/9
489.50
89.1%
6-8 ENG
Emily Carr
1972
2
437.5
6-8 EFI
458.50
104.8%
476.00
108.8%
453.00
103.5%
JK-8 ENG
Featherston
1964
4
445.5
4-8 MFI
549.50
123.3%
516.75
116.00/c
497.50
111.7%
General Vanier
1963
0
229
JK -3 ENG
17350
75.8%
176.50
77.1%
165.50
723%
JK -5 ENG
Glen Ogilvie
1968
0
619.5
SK -5 EFI
524.50
84.7%
492.50
79.5%
455.50
73.5%
JK-8 ENG
Hawthorne
1960
3
534
5-8 G. ENG
591.25
110.7%
572.00
107.1%
553.50
103.7%
JK ENG
Pleasant Pk
1960
0
302.5
SK-6 EFI
313.00
103.5%
296.75
98.1%
298.50
98.7%
Riverview Ott
1953
1 0
399.5
JK-6 ALT
380.25
95.2%
363.00
90.90/0
342.00
85.60/.
JK-8 ENG
Vincent Massey
1958
0
745
SK-8 EFI
635.50
85.3%
663.25
89.0%
654.00
87.8%
5-8 G. EFI
Sub -Total
10
1 5630.5
5220.25
92.7%
5162.25
91.73E
4980.00
8 &4%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools /additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
BAYSHORE
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schooWadditions.
The number ofpontables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
OCDSB Schools
Year
Built
P
Planning
Capacity
Current
Grade &
Program
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003'
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
Bayshore
1965
0
632.5
JK -5 ENG
SJ -5 EFI
463.75
73.3%
453.25
71.7%
436.50
69.0%
Grant
1920
2
253
JK-6 ALT
274.00
108.3%
270.00
106.7%
290.50
114.8%
Lakeview
1964
0
220
JK ENG
SK -5 EFI
167.25
76.0%
154.50
70.2%
146.00
66.4%
Regina
1965
0
311
JK-6 ENG
230.00
74.0%
233.75
75.2%
216.50
69.6%
Severn
1960
0
339
JK-6 ENG 1
277.25
81.8% 1
246.25
1 72.6%
217.00
64.0%
Sub -Total
2
1755.5
1
1412.25 I
80.4 %. 1
1357.75
1 77,3 %. 1
1306.50 1
74.4%.
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schooWadditions.
The number ofpontables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
P`
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
BEACON HILL
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
* The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
LD Billings ES closed effective September 2002. Capacity of 228.5 is excluded from the planning capacity for 2002/03. MOE capacity will not be
(W removed until 2003/04.
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003*
Year
Planning
Current Grade
OCDSB Schools
P
ADE
o
OF ( /o)
ADE
o
OF ( /o)
Est 'd FTE
o
OF ( /o)
Built
Capacity
& Program
Carson Grove
1972
3
388
JK -5 ENG
452.25
116.6%
440.50
113.5%
396.50
102.2%
6 -8 ENG
6-8 ER
Henry Munro
1966
0
792.5
7-8 LFI
629.00
79.4%
609.00
76.8%
613.00
77.4%
7-8 G. ENG
L.D. Billings (Closed)
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
215.50
94.3%
181.75
79.5%
n/a
n/a
JK ENG
Le Phare
1975
0
338.5
SK -5 EFI
184.75
54.6%
178.75
52.8%
286.00
84.5%
Robert Hopkins
1971
0
1 460.5
1 JK -5 ENG/EFI
1 243.25
1 52.8%
227.45
49.4%
1 300.50
65.3%
Sub -Total
3
1 1979.5
1
1 1724.75
1 7&1%
1 1637.45
74.274
1 1596.00
1 80.6%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
* The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
LD Billings ES closed effective September 2002. Capacity of 228.5 is excluded from the planning capacity for 2002/03. MOE capacity will not be
(W removed until 2003/04.
klkl)
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
CEDARVIEW
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Year
Planning
Current
200012001
2001/2002
2002/2003*
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
Built
Capacity
Program
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
Bell's Comers
1953
0
519
JK -5 ENG
428.00
82.5%
386.50
74.5%
371.00
71.5%
Briargreen
1970
1 1
400
1 JK-6 ENG
453.25
113.3%
419.00
104.8%
411.50
102.9%
Christie
1970
1 0
249.5
JK-6 ENG
166.50
66.7%
161.25
64.6%
166.50
66.70/o-
6-8 ENG
D.A. Moodie
1970
2
532
6-8 EFI
569.50
107.0%
580.50
109.1%
503.00
94.5%
7-8 LFI
7-8 ENG
Greenbank
7-8 EFI
1967
0
584
7-8 LFI
517.50
88.6%
501.00
85.8%
495.00
84.8%
7-8 G. EFI
7 MFI
JK ENG
SK-6 EFI
Knoxdale
1967
0
412
4-6 MFI
368.00
89.3%
391.50
95.0%
384.00
93.2%
5-6 G. EFI
Leslie Pk
1966 1
0
302.5 1
JK-6 ENG
170.50
56.4%
184.50 1
61.0%
189.50
62.6%
JK-6 ENG
Manordale
1960
2
383.5
SK-6 EFI
445.50
1162%
41125
107.2%
379.50
99.0%
Pinec[est
1962
1
549.5
JK-8 ENG
525.25
95.60/a
482.25
87.8%
455.50
82.9%
Sub -Total
6
3932
1
3644.00
92.7%
3517.75
89.5% 1
335150
85.3%.
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
CENTRAL AND INNER
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Hopewell PS planning capacity of 800 is temporary for 2002 /03 school year.
�1
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003*
Year
Planning
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
Built
Capacity
Program
Cambridge
1974
0
335.5
JK-6 ENG
302.25
90.1%
300.50
89.6%
257.50
76.8%
Centennial
1966
0
337
JK-6 ENG
265.25
78.7%
262.75
78.0%
255.00
75.7%
JK-6 ENG
Elgin St.
1953
0
262
SK-6 EFI
186.00
71.0%
220.50
84.2%
237.50
90.60/a
JK ENG
First Avenue
1982
0
424.5
SK-6 EFI
302.50
71.3%
302.25
71.2%
308.50
72.7%
5-6 G. EFI
7-8 ENG
Glashan
1979
0
385.5
-8 LFI
330.50
85.7%
338.50
87.8%
371.00
96.2%
7-8 G ENG
JK -8 ENG
Hopewell
SK-8 EFI
1996
0
800
4 -8 MFI
728.75
80.1%
813.00
89.4%
823.50
102.9%
7-8 G. EFI
Udy Evelyn
1991
0
368
JK-6 ALT
274.50
74.6%
259.25
70.4%
248.50
67.5%
1911
0
417.5
JK-6 ENG
Mutchrnor
1 -6 G.ENG
32125
76.9%
345.50
82.8%
336.50
80.6%
V. Alexander
1950
2
179.5
JK-6 ENG
188.00
104.7%
182.30
101.6%
180.50
100.60/0
York
1921
0
1
388
JK-8 ENG
305.25
78.7%
310.75
80.1%
314.00
80.90/0
Sub -Total
1
2
3897.5
3204.25
1 80.0%.
1 3335.30
1 83.2 %
3332.50
1 85.5%.
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Hopewell PS planning capacity of 800 is temporary for 2002 /03 school year.
�1
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
HUNT CLUB
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules ( RCM's), leased facilities and new schools /additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
s The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
F]
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Year
Planning
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003*
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
Built
Capacity
Program
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est•d FTE
OF ( %)
Blossom Pk
1956
0
449
JK-8 ENG
306.25
68.2%
280.50
62.5%
288.50
64.3%
Dunlop
1970
0
1 351
JK-6 ENG
297.50
84.8%
313.00
89.2%
283.00
80.6%
JK-8 ENG
Elizabeth Pk.
1962
3
1 412.5
SK -3 EFI
277.25
67.2%
300.50
72.8%
325.50
78.9%
4-8 ENG
Fielding Dr.
1968
0
651.5
5-8 EFI
593.00
91.0%
542.50
83.3%
500.00
76.7%
R.B. Curry
1976
0
320
JK-6 ENG
318.50
99.5%
289.25
90.4%
265.50
83.00/a
JK-6 ENG
Robert Bateman
1990
0
639.5
SK-6 EFI
571.75
89.4%
555.00
86.8%
540.50
84.5%
JK-8 ENG
Roberta Bondar
1995
5
760
SK-8 EFI
817.25
107.5%
809.25
106.5%
841.50
110.7%
JK-8 ENG
Sawmill Creek
1996
0
632
SK-8 EFI
671.00
106.2%
661.25
104.6%
624.50
98.8%
7-8 LFI
Sub -Total
8
4215.5
3852.50
91.4%
3751.25
89.0% 1
3669.00
97.0%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules ( RCM's), leased facilities and new schools /additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
s The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
F]
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
MERIVALE
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
McGregor Easson PS planning capacity revised to account for classroom to kindergarten conversion.
43
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003•
Year
Planning
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
Built
Capacity
Program
JK -5 ENG
Agincourt
1958
1
498
SK -5 EFI
567.25
113.9%
562.50
113.0%
480.50
96.5%
Carleton Heights
1947
0
418
JK-8 ENG
263.25
63.0%
271.00
64.8%
268.50
64.2%
Century
1967
0
473.5
JK-6 ENG
427.25
90.2%
425.75
89.9%
364.50
77.0%
6-8 ENG
J.H. Putman
1960
0
361
6-8 EFI
199.50
55.3%
180.00
49.9%
265.00
73.4%
McGregor Easson
1964
1
228.5
JK-6 ENG
231.00
101.1%
211.25
92.5%
201.00
88.0%
Meadowlands
1958
1
460.5
JK-6 ENG
502.75
109.2%
485.75
105.5%
429.50
93.3°%
JK ENG
Merivale
1953
0
449.5
SK-6 EFI
535.00
119.00/0
178.75
39.8%
267.50
59.5%
JK ENG
Parkwood Hills
1963
0
436
SK-6 EFI
350.50
80.4%
338.75
77.7%
331.00
75.9%
7-8 ENG
S.W. Churchill
1965
0
679.5
7-8 EFI
640.50
94.3%
629.50
92.6%
638.00
93.9%
7-8 LFI
W.E. Gowling
1947
0
687
JK-6 ENG
460.50
67.0%
498.75
72.6%
489.50
71.3%
Sub -Total
3
4691.5
4177.50
89.0%
3782.00
80.6%
3735.00
79.6%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
McGregor Easson PS planning capacity revised to account for classroom to kindergarten conversion.
43
V� U� Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
OTTAWA EAST
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools /additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
° The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Year
Planning
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003•
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
Built
Capacity
Program
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
JK-6 ENG
Manor Pk
1950
0
653.5
SK-6 EFI
491.50
75.2%
462.00
70.7%
469.00
71.8%
JK-6 ALT
JK-8 ENG
Queen Elizabeth
1954
0
638.5
7-8 EFI
464.25
72.7%
537.50
842%
503.00
78.8%
4-8 MFI
Queen Mary
1956
0
345
JK-6 ENG
256.00
74.2%
327.75
95.0%
314.50
912'/0
Robert E. Wilson
1955
0
286.5
JK-6 ENG
248.50
86.7%
249.00
86.9% 1
246.50
86.00/a
JK-6 ENG
Rockcliffe Pk
1946
0
338
SK-6 EFI
361.50
107.0%
37625
111.3%
386.00
1142%
Sub -Total
0
2261.5
1998.00
88.3 %.
1952.50
86.3%
1919.00
86.9%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools /additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
° The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
`l
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2 )
OTTAWA WEST
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Current
200012001
2001/2002
2002/2003•
Year
Planning
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
Built
Capacity
Program
ADE
OF ( ° /.)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
JK-8 ENG
Broadview
1930
2
739
7 -8 LFI
653.75
88.5%
717.50
97.1%
704.00
95.3%
5-8 G. ENG
Churchill
1991
0
399
JK-6 ALT
364.25
91.3%
344.50
86.3%
347.00
87.0%
Connaught
1993
0
420.5
JK-6 ENG
338.25
80.4%
338.75
80.6%
319.00
75.9%
JK-8 ENG
D. Roy Kennedy
1954
2
558.5
4-8 MFI
589.75
105.6%
581.00
104.0%
605.00
108.3%
JK ENG
Devonshire
1910
0
302
SK-6 EM
169.00
56.0%
168.50
55.8%
168.50
55.8%
JK-6 ENG
Elmdale
1928
4
420.5
SK-6 EFI
493.50
117.4%
503.00
119.6%
477.00
113.4%
7-8 ENG
Fisher Park/Sumrnit
1949
0
844.5
7-8 EFI
542.00
64.2%
519.00
61.5%
497.00
58.9%
7-8 ALT
Hilson
1999
0
432.5
JK-6 ENG
179.75
41.6%
178.25
41.2%
180.50
41.7%
JK ENG
Woodroffe
1949
0
485.5
SK-6 EF1
392.00
80.7%
411.75
84.8%
438.50
90.3%
Sub -Total
8
4602
3722.25
80.9%
3762.25
81.89E
3736.50
81.29E
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
�I v Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
EAST URBAN CENTRE - CUMBERLAND
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools /additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
F]
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Year
Planning
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003*
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade 4,
guilt
Capacity
Program
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
JK ENG
D. Foubert
1981
6
375.5
SK-6 EFI
487.50
129.8%
469.25
125.0%
429.50
114.4%
JK-8 ENG
Fallingbrook
1988
2
521.5
SK-8 EFI
550.25
105.5%
535.25
102.6%
519.50
99.6%
JK-8 ENG
Maple Ridge
1998
3
644.5
SK-8 EFI
482.00
74.8%
569.25
88.3%
650.50
100.90/0
5-6 G. ENG
JK-6 ENG
Queenswood
1969
0
359.5
SK-6 EF1
214.00
59.5%
211.00
58.7%
196.50
54.7%
JK-8 ENG
Trillium
1994
0
644.5
SK-8 EFI
546.75
84.8%
525.50
81.5%
519.50
80.6%
7-8 LFI
Sub -Total
11 1
2545.5
1
2280.50
89.6%
2310.25
90.8%
2315.50
91.0%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools /additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
F]
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board q�
SECTION 2
EAST URBAN CENTRE - GLOUCESTER
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schooWadditions.
The number ofportables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
' The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Terry Fox ES planning capacity of 314.5 reflects reduction of 196 to account for removal of 8 RCMs.
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003•
Year
Planning
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
Built
Capacity
Program
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
Convent Glen
1975
1
253
JK -5ENG
237.25
93.8%
235.00
92.9%
225.50
89.1%
JK -5 ENG
Forest Valley
1989
0
595
SK -5 EFI
458.25
77.0%
425.00
71.4%
420.00
70.6%
JK ENG
Henry Larsen
1986
0
624.5
499.25
79.9%
484.00
77.5%
476.50
76.3%
7-8 LFII
JK-6 ENG
Orleans Wood
1983
0
412.5
SK-6 EFI
289.00
70.1%
27125
65.8%
254.50
61.7%
JK-8 ENG
Terry Fox
1981
8
314.5
K-
538.50
105.5%
476.50
93.3%
437.00
139.0%
7-8 LEFI
FI
Sub -Total
9
2199.5
1 1022.25
84.4 %.
1891.75
1 79.0 %.
1 1813.50
82.5%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schooWadditions.
The number ofportables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
' The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Terry Fox ES planning capacity of 314.5 reflects reduction of 196 to account for removal of 8 RCMs.
��q
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
RURAL NORTHEAST
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
* The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
F]
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Year
Planning
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003*
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
Built
Capacity
Program
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
JK-6 ENG
Meadowview
1966
2
252.5
SK-6 EFI
260.00
103.0%
260.00
103.0%
244.00
96.6%
Riverview Cumb
1953
0
229.5
1 JK -8 ENG
1775
48.7%
87.50
38.10%
67.50
29.4%
Sub -Total
1
2
482
371.75
77.1%
347.50
_72.1%
1 311.50
64.6 %.
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
* The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
F]
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2 /
RURAL NORTHWEST
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools /additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Stonecrest ES planning capacity includes 269 pupil places which are available Sept 2002.
Historical, Actual and Status IQNuo Pro'ections
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003*
Year
Planning
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
Built
Capacity
Program
JK-8 ENG
Fitzroy Centennial
1967
0
289.5
7-8 LFI
324.75
112.2%
289.00
99.8%
274.00
94.6%
Fitzroy Harbour
1919
1
73.5
JK-6 ENG
72.00
98.0%
73.00
99.3%
71.50
97.3%
JK-8 ENG
H. Centennial
1967
5
387.5
SK -8 EF1
456.50
117.8%
424.75
109.6%
405.00
104.5%
JK -8 ENG
1998
0
632.5
SK -8 EFI
484.75
133.4%
559.75
154.0%
587.50
92.90/a
Stonecrest
4 -7 MFI
Torbolton
1963
0
171
JK-6 ENG
163.75
95.8%
156.00
91.2%
131.00
76.6%
Sub -Total
1 6
1554
1501.75
1169%
1502.50
116.9%
1469.00
94.5%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools /additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Stonecrest ES planning capacity includes 269 pupil places which are available Sept 2002.
�ro
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
RURAL SOUTHEAST
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
* The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Year
Planning
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003*
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
Built
Capacity
Program
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
JK ENG
Castor Valley
1986
0
486.5
SK -8 EFI
501.75
103.1%
511.50
105.1%
507.50
104.3%
7-8 LFI
Greet
1972
8
171
JK-6 ENG
286.25
167.4%
263.50
154.1%
231.50
135.4%
Metcalfe
1957
3
473
JK-8 ENG
443.75
93.8%
456.75
1 96.6%
456.00
96.4%
Os code
1953
2
252.5
JK-6 ENG
280.25
111.0%
275.00
108.9%
260.00
103.0%
Sub -Total
13
1383
1511.00
1506 75
108.9%
1 1455.00
1 105.1%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
* The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
5l
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
RURAL SOUTHWEST
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
LW • The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Historical, Actual and Status o Pro'ections
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/20030
Year
Planning
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
ADE
°
OF ( /o)
ADE
o
OF (/°)
Est 'd FTE
o
OF (/o)
Built
Capacity
Program
6 -8 ENG
Goulbourn
1966
3
425.5
6-8 EFI
452.50
106.3%
480.00
112.8%
491.00
115.4%
7-8 LFI
JK ENG
Kars
1945
0
228.5
SK -5 EFI
123.50
54.0%
124.75
54.60/c
135.50
59.3%
JK -5 ENG
Manotick
1947
3
302
SK -5 EFI
328.25
108.7%
339.25
112.3%
344.50
114.1%
Munster
1977
0
229
JK -5 ENG
205.75
89.8%
197.50
86.2%
181.00
79.0%
North Gower
1969
4
277.5
JK -5ENG
320.00
115.3%
350.00
126.1%
340.50
122.7%
Richmond
1924
1
207
JK -5 ENG
204.75
98.90/0
215.50
104.1%
197.50
95.4%
6-8 ENG
1975
0
450
6-8 EFI
402.50
89.4%
426.00
94.7%
418.00
92.9%
Rideau Valley
7-8 LFI
Sub -Total
11
2119.5
1 2037.15
1 96.1'%
1 2133.00
1 100.6'X.
2108.00
1 99.5'X,
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
LW • The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
� V
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
SOUTH URBAN CENTRE WEST
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
* The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Adrienne Clarkson ES planning capacity is included as 742 based on current use of facility.
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Pro'ections
Year
Planning
Current
2000/2001
200112002
2002/2003*
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
Built
Capacity
Program
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
JK -5 ENG
Barrhaven
1968
1
424
SK -5 EFI
541.75
127.8%
416.75
98.3%
384.50
90.7%
6-8 ENG
Cedarview
6-8 EFI
1994
5
756
7-8 LFI
793.50
105.0%
791.00
104.6%
818.00
108.2%
7-8 G. ENG
JK -5 ENG
Jockvale
1985
0
498
SK -5 EFI
411.75
82.7%
378.75
76.1%
366.50
73.60/a
JK-6 ENG
Adrienne Clarkson
2002
0
742
SK-6 EFI
n/a
n/a
616.75
83.1%
742.50
100.1%
JK -5 ENG
Mary Honeywell
1989
0
593.5
SK -5 EFI
631.00
106.3%
588.50
99.2%
509.00
85.8%
Sub-Total 1
1
6 1
3013.5 1
1378.00
104.7%
2791.75
92.6% 1
2820.50
93.6%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
* The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Adrienne Clarkson ES planning capacity is included as 742 based on current use of facility.
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
5f 3
STITTSVILLE
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
' The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Historical, Actual and Status Qu o Projections
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003•
Year
Planning
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
ADE
o
OF ( /o)
ADE
o
OF (/o)
Est 'd FTE
o
OF (/o)
guilt
Capacity
Program
SK-8 ENG
A.L. Cassidy
1991
6
644
SK-8 EFI
791.50
122.9%
768.00
119.3%
777.50
120.7%
JK -5 ENG
Stittsville
1953
5
399.5
SK -5 EFI
456.50
114.3%
448.00
112.1%
447.00
111.90/0
Sub -Total
11
1043.5
1248.00
1 119.6
1116.00
1 116.5%
1224.50
1 117.3%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schools/additions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
' The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
WEST URBAN CENTRE - KANATA NORTH
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schooWadditions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
F]
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Year
Planning
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003•
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
Built
Capacity
Program
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
Roland Michener
1970
9
313.5
JK-6 ENG
521.50
166.3%
507.00
161.7%
573.50
182.9%
JK ENG
S. Leacock
1965
8
522.5
SK-8 EFI
625.50
119.7%
695.50
133.1%
723.50
138.5%
7-8 LFI
W.E. Johnston
1969
10
473.5
JK-8 ENG
717.50 1
151.5%
709.00
149.7%
725.50
153.2%
Sub -Total
27
1309.5
1864.50 1
142.4%
1911.50
146.0%
2022.50
1544%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schooWadditions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
F]
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board SECTION 2
WEST URBAN CENTRE - KANATA SOUTH
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schooWadditions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Pro'ections
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003*
Year
Planning
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade &
ADE
OF ( %)
ADE
OF ( %)
Est'd FTE
OF ( %)
guilt
Capacity
Program
JK -8 ENG
Bridlewood
1987
11
474
7-8 G. ENG
609.25
128.5%
679.25
143.3%
702.00
148.1%
JK-6 ENG
Castlefrank
1988
3
483
SK-6 EFI
504.50
104.5%
484.50
100.3%
461.00
95.4%
Glen Cairn
1967
0
411.5
JK-6 ENG
353.75
86.0%
314.75
76.5%
278.00
67.6%
JK-6 ENG
1977
0
571
SK-6 EFI
506.50
88.7%
503.75
88.2%
484.50
84.9%
John Young
5-6 G. ENG
JK ENG
Katimavik
SK-8 EFI
1981
0
400
4,5 MFI
326.50
81.6%
340.00
85.0%
342.00
85.5%
7-8 LFI
JK-8 ENG
W.O. Mitchell
1998
11
559
SK-8 EFI
694.50
124.2%
769.75
137.7%
797.50
142.7%
Sub -Total
25
2898.5
2995.00
1 103.3%
3092.00
106.7%
3065.00
105.7%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's), leased facilities and new schooWadditions.
The number of portables (P) is based on 02/03 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factors (UF) are calculated using that year's Planning Capacity.
• The estimated Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for 2002/03 is based on September 30, 2002 actual enrolment figures.
•
7JJI
OTUWA- GRLE -M
DISTRICT SCHOOL BO�RO
SECTION 3
Financial Impact
Facilities and Physical Planning
28 October 2002
The Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
Recommended School Closures for 2003/04
Financial Impact
.3avin s I Decreased Revenue
Custodial Operations (1) Average Costs for Average Costs for Small Schools Reduced
PrincioaINP (2) 1 Office Staff and Technicians (31 1 grant I 11Tnn_1TW1 Pn Ad !d\
rsa eV1 errn
Elementary Schools
J.H. Putman
$145,000
$97,000
$31,844
0
71,344
$202,500
Lakeview
$79,000
$0
$55,727
77,672
$57,055
Riverview Cumberland
$102,000
$0
$71,649
110,000
64,000
-$351
Total Annualized Savings
$326,000
$97,000
$159,220
($110,000) ($213,016)
$259,204
less one -time costs for 2003104:
ongoing utilities, mothballing costs etc ($30,000)
moving costs, misc, renovations etc ($20,000)
Total Fiscal Savings, 2003/04: 1 $209,204
Notes:
1. Includes utilities, custodial, and grounds expenses, but not maintenance.
2. Based on average salary and benefits per Budget.
3. Represents savings net of increases at receiving schools.
4. Represents the net reduction in top -up funds as a result of closures and redirections.
(W_ (W tw
(WI
•
M-j
OTTAWA- CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
SECTION 4
Community Use of Schools
Facilities and Physical Planning
5
28 October 2002
ti�
OTTAWA-CARLETON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
COMMUNITY USE OF SCHOOLS
SELECTED SCHOOLS - BREAKDOWN OF COMMUNITY USE BY SCHOOL / PERMIT HOLDER
1 September 2001- 31 August 2002
SECTION 4
.......................
...
.j:: ........................
...............................
.......
......... ......................................
...........
..................................................................................
.......................
.........................................
....................................................
........
.........
.. ....... •................ .......
...................
............... ............
........ ...................................................
-.:::::::::T
....
......
..................................................
..................
TA ................................
....................
...............
.......
......... ............
........ ............
. ................. ..........
1
J.H. Putman
School Activities
x
179.00
School
Music Day
x
30.00
School
Meetings
x
28.00
School Council
Meetings
x
2.50
School Council
Meetings
x
58.00
Youth
Meetings
x
126.00
Youth
School Activities
x
3.50
School
School Activities
x
2.00
School
School Activities
x
9.00
School
Sub-Total
438.00
2
Lakeview
School Activities
x
21.50
School
School Activities
x
13.00
School
School Activities
x
7.00
School
School Activities
x
38.00
School
Music Lessons
x
35.00
Private
Adult Tai Chi
x
15.00
Municipal
Open House
X
5.00
Municipal
Gymnastics
x
232.00
Community
School Activities
x
4.50
School
School Activities
x
3.25
School
School Activities
x
3.00
School
lMeeting
x
2.50
Private
ISub -Total
379.75
3
Riverview Cumberland
Meetings
x
22.00
School Council
School Activities
x
6.00
School
Before and After School
x
128.00
Municipal
Open House
x
5.50
Municipal
Exercise Classes
x
61.00
Community
Meetings
x
5.50
Municipal
ISoccer
- Field Only
I
X
344.00
Community
iSub
-Total
572.00
TOTAL
1,389.75
6 Wn
28 October 2002
0
� � C
L�
OTUWA-CARLEfON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
SECTION 5
Current and Proposed
Attendance Boundary Maps For
Closed/Receiving Schools
Facilities and Physical Planning
28 October 2002
SECTION 5
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board NEW 2002/03*
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
Agincourt Road P.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 5 ENG
* Reflects Board motion of May 14, 2002 to redirect Agincourt Grade 6 ENG and EFI to J.H. Putman for 2002103.
Edulog #770
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation
May 2002
SECTION
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board NEW 2002/03*
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
Agincourt Road P.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 5 EFI
* Reflects Board motion of May 14, 2002 to redirect Agincourt Grade 6 ENG and EFI to JH. Putman for 2002103.
Edulog #771
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation May 2002
') Ciiil J' vV
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board NEW *
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries 200203
J.H. Putman P.S.
Grade 6 ENG
%// J
i
°s
w o
V'
* Reflects Board motion of May 14, 2002 to redirect Agincourt Grade 6 ENG and EFI to J.H. Putman for 2002103.
Edulog #
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation May 2002
NEW SECTION * / r,1
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board NE ry 2002/03 (�__lI
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries Map 1 of 2
J.H. Putman P.S.
Grade 6 to 8 EFI
* Reflects Board motion of May 14, 2002 to redirect Agincourt Grade 6 ENG and EFI to J.H. Putman for 2002103.
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation May 2002
i
SECTION ,
NEW 2002/03
JH Putman PS Closure Recommendation
Revised Agincourt PS JK -6 ENG Boundary
F]
crr, nmTlll�r c
NEW 20021036
JH Putman PS Closure Recommendation,
Revised Agincourt PS K -6 EFI Boundary
M
OTTAWA- CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Recommended School Closures for 2002/2003
Arising from Budget 2002/2003
RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the original 26 March 2002 report.
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
OTTAWA- CARLETON
I)hTAICT 41 I' II it Ni-11
Table of Contents
Recommended School Closures for 2002/2003 Arising from Budget 2002/2003
Page(s)
FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS
SECTION I. J. H. Putman Public School .................................................. ............................... 1
SECTION II. Lakeview Public School .................................... ............................... 9
SECTION III. Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School ............... ............................... 17
SECTION IV. Riverview Public School ............................................................ ............................... 28
SECTION V. J. S. Woodsworth Secondary School ..................... ............................... 35
APPENDICES
A. City of Ottawa Sub -Area Utilizations - Elementary ....................................... ............................... 45
B. Review Area Utilizations - Secondary ............................................................. ............................... 66
C. Financial Impact ............................................................................................... ............................... 69
D. Population Information .................................................................... ............................... 71
E. Community Use of Schools ................................................................ ............................... 73
F. Current Attendance Boundary Maps for Closed/ Receiving Schools .............................. 76
G. Timelines ........................................................................... ............................... 103
L
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
(6-1
70=j-
OT-IAWA-CARLETON
1)11 -CT 1CH1,01 P0 1111
SECTION I
J. H. Putman Public School
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
0
LT-"-
OTTAWA- CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
rl0
Recommended School Closures for 2002,/2003 Arising from Budget 2002/2003
School Name: J.H. PUTMAN PS
A. RECOMMENDATION
i) Close J.H. Putman PS, effective September 2002.
ii) Redirect J.H. Putman PS 7 -8 Early French Immersion to Fisher Park PS.
iii) Redirect J.H. Putman PS 7 -8 English to Pinecrest PS.
iv) Remove J.H. Putman PS /Pinecrest PS 7 -8 English 'option area' and direct all 7 -8 English
students to Pinecrest PS.
V) Relocate General Learning Program (GLP) and Special Support Unit (SSU) system classes
currently at Pinecrest PS to Fisher Park PS.
vi) Relocate Primary Assessment Centre (PAC) system class currently at Pinecrest PS to
Century PS.
B. SCHOOL DESCRIPTION
J.H. Putman PS is located on the north side of Bel Air Drive, just south of Highway 417 between
Woodroffe Avenue and Maitland Avenue. The school's local area includes the communities of
Bel Air Park, Bel Air Heights and Copeland Park,
J.H. Putman PS has a Ministry Capacity of 361. The school was built in 1960 and currently
operates as a dedicated intermediate facility serving Grade 7 and 8 English and Early French
Immersion students.
C. RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
J.H. Putman PS is located in the Merivale Sub -area. This area contains approximately 900 pupil
spaces surplus to its current needs and is operating at 80.3% utilization. Please see Appendix A
for details.
J.H. Putman PS is currently operating at 49% of its full utilization and contains 182 surplus pupil
spaces. These figures are as per October 2001 enrolment.
26 March 2002
r/ /
The City of Ottawa's population projections, which will form the basis for the new Official Plan,
forecast a decline of 2.5% in the 0 -14 school -age population for the Merivale Sub -area between
2001 and 2011.
Over the past 10 years, J.H. Putman PS has been consistently underutilized. Enrolment at J.H.
Putman within this 10 year period has averaged 213 students or a 59% utilization.
J.H. Putman's current enrolment of 179 students in October 2001 represents its lowest enrolment
in 10 years. Over this same period of time, enrolment at the school peaked at only 231 students in
October 1994 (64% utilization).
Projected enrolments for J.H. Putman PS continue to forecast a very low utilization for the school.
It is anticipated that enrolment at J.H. Putman will increase gradually over the next five years
and decline thereafter.
The Merivale Sub -area and adjacent areas contain a number of potential relocation options for the
Early French Immersion and English program students currently at J.H. Putman PS. In all cases,
the programs could be moved in a block fashion, without splitting current attendance
boundaries.
D. Actual and Projected Enrolments and Utilizations of affected schools
i) Status Quo projections and utilizations
School
Cap.
Port.
01/02
Grade/
Program
ADE
01/02
OF
(' %,)
ADE
02,/03
OF
( "/1)
ADE
06/07
OF
NO
J.H. Putman PS
361
0
7 -8 ENG /EFl
179
49.6%
188
52.1%
?221
61?%
Fisher Park PS
844.5
0
7 -8 ENG /EFI /ALT
514
60.9%
470
55.7%
516
61.1 %
Pinecrest PS
549.5
2
JK -8 ENG
480 1
87.4% 1
471
85.7%
410
74.6%
Century PS
473.5
1
JK -6 ENG
425
89.8%
416.5
88.0%
402.5
85%
Impact of the Recommendations on "receiving" schools' projections and utilizations
E. STUDENT REDIRECTIONS
Revised attendance boundary maps as per this recommendation are attached to the end of this
section (see Maps I -1 and I -2).
The recommended closure of J.H. Putman PS, effective September 2002, would result in the
relocation of approximately 188 Grade 7 and 8 students. It is projected that 91 Early French
Immersion students would be redirected to Fisher Park PS and 97 English students would be
redirected to Pinecrest PS for the 2002/03 school year.
26 March 2002
Grade/
Pro a
ADE
02/03
OF
' %,
ADE
60School 7
OF
Fisher Park PS
7 -8 ENG /EFI /ALT
582
68.9%
656
77.7%
Pinecrest PS
JK -8 ENG
537
97.7%
481
87.5%
Century PS
JK -6 ENG
426.5
90.1%
412.5
87.1%
E. STUDENT REDIRECTIONS
Revised attendance boundary maps as per this recommendation are attached to the end of this
section (see Maps I -1 and I -2).
The recommended closure of J.H. Putman PS, effective September 2002, would result in the
relocation of approximately 188 Grade 7 and 8 students. It is projected that 91 Early French
Immersion students would be redirected to Fisher Park PS and 97 English students would be
redirected to Pinecrest PS for the 2002/03 school year.
26 March 2002
/a _
It should be noted that the students currently attending J.H. Putman PS on student transfers
would move en masse with the J.H. Putman enrolment.
In addition, three congregated special education system classes currently located at Pinecrest PS
would be relocated to other schools. In consultation with Special Education/ Student Services, it
is recommended that the GLP and SSU system classes be relocated to Fisher Park PS and the PAC
system class be relocated to Century PS. The relocation of these system classes would allow
students from J.H. Putman to be accommodated at Pinecrest without additional portables.
Currently, students residing in the area between Cobden Road, Woodroffe Avenue, Baseline
Road and Highway 417 have the option of attending either Pinecrest or J.H. Putman for Grade 7
English. As a result of the closure, these students would now be directed to Pinecrest PS only.
Note that approximately 60% of current 7 -8 ENG students resident in this area have chosen to
attend Pinecrest PS.
F. IMPACT ON PROGRAMS
No changes to current regular program offerings at receiving schools are proposed as part of the
closure of J.H. Putman PS.
Should the recommendations be approved, the Early French Immersion population at Fisher Park
would be significantly strengthened. Currently, the EFI program at Fisher Park is projected to
have 45 Grade 7 and 35 Grade 8 students for September 2002. With the addition of the J.H.
Putman students, Fisher Park's projected EFI numbers increase to 86 Grade 7 and 85 Grade 8
students.
(W As part of the recommendation, three congregated special education system classes (PAC, GLP,
and SSU) will be relocated from Pinecrest PS for September 2002. These system classes will be
relocated to schools which can provide the appropriate learning environment and resources for
students in these programs. The GLP and SSU system classes will be relocated to Fisher Park PS
and the PAC system class will be relocated to Century PS.
G. IMPACT ON CHILD CARE CENTRES
There is no impact on the provision of Child Care as a result of the closure of JH Putman PS.
H. IMPACT ON COMMUNITY
As of September 2002, the community will no longer have access to J.H. Putman PS under this
recommendation. Please see Appendix E for details respecting community use of the school.
Staff will consider the organizational needs and interests of these community groups in
determining whether they can be accommodated in other schools located in relatively close
proximity to J.H. Putman PS.
I. IMPACT ON FACILITIES
In order to meet the approved timelines, staff did not recommend any closures which would
require major renovations at the receiving school(s).
26 March 2002
1�-
Pinecrest PS currently has two portables on site. Should the recommendations be approved, it is
anticipated that additional portables will not be required at Pinecrest PS for the 2002/03 school
year.
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
The Board is not providing busing to Grade 7 and 8 students resident within the Urban Transit
Area (UTA) for the 2002/03 school year. As such, there would be no impact to transportation
costs as a result of the approval of the closure of J.H. Putman PS.
The closure of J.H. Putman will impact a number of students within its local area who are
currently able to walk to school. These students will now be required to travel a further distance
to either Pinecrest PS or Fisher Park PS.
A majority of J.H. Putman's EFI program students currently receive transportation. As per the
change in policy, these students will now have to make their own way to school. For some, the
closure of J.H. Putman and redirection to Fisher Park PS will serve to increase travel distances
and times. In some areas of the boundary, however, access via public transportation routes will
be more convenient and will result in shorter travel times.
It is not anticipated that additional costs will be incurred in the transportation of students in the
congregated special education system classes due to the specialized vehicles required for some of
these students.
K. FINANCIAL IMPACT
Please see Appendix C for details respecting the estimated financial savings should J.H. Putman
PS be closed effective September 2002.
L. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Alternative accommodation scenarios considered included the following:
i) Redirecting all of J.H. Putman (English and Early French Immersion) to Fisher Park
PS.
Fisher Park PS currently offers a 7 -8 ENG, EFI and Alternative program and contains
sufficient surplus pupil space to accommodate all of J.H. Putman's projected. ENG and
EFI students.
Staff did not pursue this option as it was felt that, where possible, regular English
program students should be accommodated at schools within their Iocal area.
ii) Redirecting J.H. Putman English program students to D. Roy Kennedy PS.
D. Roy Kennedy PS currently offers a JK -8 ENG and a 4 -8 Middle French Immersion
program and is operating at 104% utilization with one portable on site.
In order to accommodate J.H. Putman's English program students for 2002, the MFI
program at D. Roy Kennedy would have to be relocated, in part or in whole.
26 March 2002
7�1
Staff did not pursue this option as it would have served to increase student disruption
significantly beyond those students directly affected by the recommended closure, split
or relocate in whole a successful MFI program at D. Roy Kennedy, reduce accessibility to
the MFI program for those students newly redirected to D. Roy Kennedy for September
2002, and direct students to cross Highway 417.
iii) Redirecting J.H. Putman English program students to Carleton Heights PS.
Carleton Heights PS currently offers a JK -8 ENG program and is operating at 65%
utilization.
Staff did not pursue this option as it was felt that, where possible, regular English
program students should be accommodated at schools within their local area.
iv) Splitting J.H. Putman's current ENG and EFI attendance areas following a
Woodroffe /Carling/Maitland, north -south boundary (mirrors current Secondary
boundaries north of Highway 417).
Under this scenario, students residing west of the above -noted boundary would be
redirected to D. Roy Kennedy for 7 -8 ENG and EFI. Students residing east of the
boundary would be redirected to Fisher Park for 7 -8 ENG and EFI, and 7 -8 ENG students
residing in the'option area' would be redirected to Pinecrest.
In order to pursue this option staff would have had to consider increasing student
disruption significantly, splitting a successful MFI program at D. Roy Kennedy between
two schools, and splitting J.H. Putman's current program attendance boundaries and
student populations between three schools.
This option also results in a small 7 -8 EFI program population at D. Roy Kennedy
(approximately 60 students split between Grades 7 and 8):
26 March 2002
1�t�
OTTAWA CARTE TUN
SECTION II
Lakeview Public School
Facilities and Phvsical Planning 26 March 2002
7C457.
7
OTTAWA - CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Recommended School Closures for 2002,/2003 Arising from Budget 2002,/2003
School Name: LAKEVIEW PUBLIC SCHOOL
A. RECOMMENDATION
i) Close Lakeview Public School, effective September 2002;
ii) Redirect JK ENG, SK -5 EFI program students from Lakeview Public SchooI's attendance area
to Bell's Corners Public School; and,
iii) Relocate the Language Learning Disabilities system program (LLD) currently at Bell's
Corners Public School to Bayshore Public School.
B. SCHOOL DESCRIPTION
Lakeview Public School is located in the Bayshore sub -area (as defined by the Urban Sub -Areas of
Ottawa - Carleton). This sub -area encompasses the communities of Crystal Bay, Rocky Point, Crystal
Beach and Lakeview. This sub -area is bounded by major roadways: Carling Avenue (for the most
part) on the north, Acres Road on the east, Highway #417 on the south and Moodie Drive on the
west.
More specifically, Lakeview Public School is located on Corkstown Road.
Lakeview Public School serves the community by offering JK English and SK - Grade 5 Early French
Immersion programs.
C. RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
As noted in section B above, Lakeview Public School is located in the Bayshore sub -area which
contains five elementary schools and one secondary school. Currently, the sub -area is operating at
approximately 77% utilization (elementary schools only). Refer to Appendix A for details.
26 March 2002
�7
Lakeview Public School is currently operating at approximately 71% utilization. In accordance with
October 2001 enrolment statistics, Lakeview Public School has approximately 65 surplus pupil places.
This surplus is anticipated to increase to approximately 100 pupil places by 2006/2007.
Lakeview Public School has seen a steady decline in enrolment since its high in 1989 of 305 pupils. It
should be noted, however, that the school has experienced minor fluctuations, both positive and
negative, in enrolment from year to year.
The anticipated decline in enrolment at Lakeview Public School is consistent with the City of
Ottawa's population projections for this sub -area. Based on the City's predictions, it is anticipated
that the 0 -14 school -age population for this area will decline by 8.9% between 2001 and 2011.
English program students from the Lakeview attendance area are directed to Bell's Corners Public
School (which is located in the Cedarview sub - area). Bell's Corners Public School is also operating
below 80% capacity.
Staff's recommendation assumes a full block of move of ENG /EFI program students to Bell's Corners
Public School, which will minimize disruption to students. In addition, the current attendance
boundaries for Bell's Corners Public School and Lakeview Public School are congruent and students
residing in this boundary will have the option of choosing either the English program or the Early
French Immersion program in their home school. In all cases, English program students and Early
French Immersion program students from these school's attendance boundaries would attend D.A.
Moodie I.S.
It should be highlighted that there are three other elementary schools in the Bayshore sub -area that
are operating at less than 75% utilization. The attendance boundaries for other schools in the
Bayshore sub -area are more complex than the attendance boundary between Lakeview Public School
and Bell's Corners Public School. As a result, students may need to be redirected to more than one
elementary school and intermediate school, depending on the student's program choice. As such,
staff would anticipate that further consolidation of space in this sub -area would need to be done in
conjunction with schools in other sub - areas.
D. Actual and Projected Enrolments and Utilizations of affected schools
i) Status Quo projections and utilizations
26 March 2002
Port.
Grade/
ADE
OF
ADE
OF
ADE
OF
School
Cap.
01/02
Program
01/02
(1 %)
02,/03
(' %,)
06/07
NO
Bayshore P.S.
632.5
0
JK -5 ENG /SK -5 ER
457.5
72.3
460.5
72.5
411.5
65.1
Bell's Corners P.S.
519
0
JK -5 ENG
354.5
74.1
354.5
74.1
350.5
67.5
Lakeview P.S.
220
0
JK ENG, SK -5 EFI
156.5
71.1
149.5
67.9
120.5
54.5
26 March 2002
0
ii) Impact on "receiving" schools' projections and utilizations
School
Grade/
Program
ADE
02/03
OF
(Yo)
ADE
06/07
OF
CY11)
Bayshore P.S.
JK -5 ENG /SK -5 EFI
471.5
74.5
422.5
66.5
Bell's Corners P.S.
JK -5 ENG /SK -5 EFI
523
100.5
460
58.6
E. STUDENT REDIRECTIONS
Students currently residing in the Lakeview attendance area would be redirected to Bell's Corners
Public School. It should be noted that the students currently attending Lakeview Public School on
student transfers would move en masse with the Lakeview enrolment. Refer to the attached revised
attendance boundary map for Bell's Corners for details.
The recommended closure of Lakeview Public School, for September 2002, will result in the
redirection of approximately 150 (ADE) ENG /EFI students to Bell's Corners Public School.
In consultation with Special Education/ Student Services, the Language Learning Disabilities system
program (LLD) currently accommodated at Bell's Corners Public School would be relocated to
Bayshore Public School. There are approximately 11 students accommodated in this system class at
Bell's Corners Public School.
F. IMPACT ON PROGRAMS
Bell's Corners Public School would become a dual -track facility offering both ENG and EFI programs.
Under the recommended redirection of students, all ENG /EFI students currently attending Lakeview
will move as a "full block ". Staff feels that, in order to maintain the viability of the EFI program
currently operating at Lakeview Public School, it is necessary to redirect these students as a unit.
The relocation of the Language Learning Disabilities system program (LLD) to Bayshore Public
School will provide greater flexibility in accommodating the students from Lakeview Public School.
It is recommended that these students be relocated to a school which will provide the appropriate
learning environment and resources for the students in that program.
G. IMPACT ON CHILD CARE CENTRES
There is no impact on Child Care Centres as a result of the closure of Lakeview Public School.
26 March 2002
�9
H. IMPACT ON COMMUNITY
As of September 2002, the community will no longer have access to Lakeview Public School under
this recommendation. Staff will consider the organizational needs and interests of these groups in vi
determining whether they can be accommodated in other schools located in relative close proximity
to Lakeview Public School.
Lakeview Public School is used to a great extent by community groups/ organizations within the
Bayshore sub -area. The major user groups are the Board and the community. Staff realizes that the
closure of Lakeview Public School will have an impact on the community in terms of available
"school" space for community activities. It should be noted that there are two OCDSB schools
located in dose proximity to Lakeview Public School, which may be available to the community for
their use. In addition, it may be possible to accommodate the community uses at a school operated
by another board, or at another community facility in the area.
I. IMPACT ON FACILITIES
In order to meet the approved timelines, staff did not recommend any closures that would require
major renovations at the receiving school(s).
Based on the recommended redirection of students from Lakeview Public School for September 2002,
staff would anticipate that some portables might be required at Bell's Corners Public School. It
should be noted, however, that staff does not anticipate the need for portables at Bell's Corners Public
School in accordance with the projected enrolments for 2006 /2007.
In addition, the potential relocation of the Language Learning Disabilities system program (LLD)
from Bell's Corners Public School to Bayshore Public School would provide greater flexibility within
the school organization to accommodate the redirection of the Lakeview Public School enrolment.
J. IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
The closure of Lakeview Public School may result in a slight increase in transportation costs when the
EFI program is relocated to Bell's Corners Public School. Currently, the majority of Lakeview Public
School's students are within walking distance of the school. In accordance with the Board's
transportation policy and procedures, all of the students residing in the Lakeview /Crystal
Beach /Crystal Bay communities would qualify for transportation to Bell's Corners Public School. It
is anticipated that these students may see a bus ride in duration of approximately 10 -20 minutes.
Conversely, some students residing in the Bell's Corners community, who are currently bused to
Lakeview Public School, may now be within walking distance of their newly designated EFI school.
It should be noted that additional costs might or may not be incurred in the transportation of
students in congregated special education programs due to the specialized vehicles required for some
of these students.
26 March 2002
K. FINANCIAL IMPACT
i/
Please refer to Appendix C for details with respect to the estimated financial savings should
Lakeview Public School be closed effective September 2002.
L. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
Alternative accommodation scenarios considered in the redirection of students from Lakeview Public
School included the following:
i) Redirect all of Lakeview Public School's attendance area to Bayshore Public School.
The redirection of Lakeview Public School's enrolment to Bayshore Public School would
result in a utilization factor of approximately 96% at Bayshore Public School. The
accommodation of the students from Lakeview Public School may result in the need for
portables at Bayshore Public School. Currently the school accommodates ancillary uses such
as the Continuing Education Adult ESL programs and the City DayCare program. With the
redirection of Lakeview Public School's enrolment, staff would have to reassess the space
requirements for elementary day school students and consider the relocation of some or all of
the Board and external programs currently operating out of Bayshore Public School.
As such, staff did not pursue this option.
ii) Redirect the Lakeview community portion of Lakeview Public School's attendance area to
Bayshore Public School and redirect the Crystal Beach/Crystal Bay portion of Lakeview
Public School's attendance area to Bell's Corners Public School.
Dividing Lakeview Public School's attendance area in this manner results in a slightly
stronger EFI program at Bayshore Public School. However, the EFI program at Bell's Corners
would be small; approximately 120 SK to Grade 5 students. Based on preliminary projected
enrolments, staff would anticipate that, for September 2002, three grades in the EFI program
at Bell's Corners Public School would be less than 20 students per grade. Staff feels that the
EFI enrolment at Lakeview Public School cannot be separated to create two viable programs.
26 March 2002
M MA
OM
iii) Redirect the students residing North of Highway #417 from Lakeview Public School's
attendance area to Bayshore Public School and redirect the students residing South of
Highway #417 from Lakeview Public School's attendance area to Bell's Corners Public
School.
Dividing Lakeview Public School's attendance area in this manner results in a strong EFI
program at Bayshore Public School. However, the EFI program at Bell's Corners would be
very small; approximately 60 SK to Grade 5 students. Based on preliminary projected
enrolments, staff would anticipate that, for September 2002, all grades in the EFI program at
Bell's Corners Public School would be less than 15 students per grade. Staff feels that the EFI
enrolment at Lakeview Public School cannot be separated to create two viable programs.
26 March 2002
Vim-' —
2TIAW -Cn�;tHON
UI� Alai ill �i�(Il pU�liU
SECTION III
Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
LT-1-
OTTAWA- CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Reconirnended School Closures for 2002112003 Arising from Budget 2002/2003
School Name: LAMIRA DOW BILLINGS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
A. RECOMMENDATION
i) Close Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School, effective September 2002;
ii) Redirect Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School JK ENG and SK -5 EFI students residing in
the Pineview /Cyrville area and a portion of the Beacon Hill South /Cardinal Heights area
(between Montreal Road and Ogilvie Road) to Le Phare Elementary School, effective
September 2002;
iii) Redirect Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School JK ENG and SK -5 EFI students residing in a
(W portion of the Beacon Hill South /Cardinal Heights area (between Hwy 17 and Ogilvie Road)
and the southerly portion of the Beacon Hill North area to Robert Hopkins Public School,
effective September 2002; and
iv) Redirect Le Phare Elementary School JK ENG and SK -5 EFI students residing in the northerly
portion of the Beacon Hill North area to Robert Hopkins Public School, effective
September 2002.
B. SCHOOL DESCRIPTION
Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School is located North of Montreal Road and East of Ogilvie Road
in the Beacon Hill North area of the former City of Gloucester. More specifically, the school is located
at 2147 Loyola Avenue, between Eastvale Drive and De Salaberry Street.
Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School was built in 1971 and has a Ministry rated capacity of 228.5.
The school currently offers a JK Regular English program and a SK -5 Early French Immersion
program with a total enrolment of 218 (186 ADE) and a utilization of 81% as of 31 October 2001.
26 March 2002
r:
Several major roadways bounding Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School's attendance area have
been given a "hazard designation ". In cases where a street has been designated "hazardous ",
students are provided with transportation.
C. RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School is located in the Beacon Hill sub -area as defined by the City
of Ottawa in the Long Term Accommodation Plan. Based on 2001/2002 enrolments, this sub -area
has surplus pupil places of approximately 560 and is operating at 75% utilization. Of the five schools
in this review area, only Carson Grove Elementary School has a utilization over 100 %. Refer to
Appendix A - Summary of Elementary Panel Utilization by City of Ottawa sub- areas.
As of October 2001, Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School is operating at 81 % utilization and has 43
surplus pupil places. The surplus pupil places is projected to increase to approximately 70 surplus
pupil places by 2006/2007.
The anticipated decline in enrolment at Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School and other schools in
this sub -area are not consistent with the City of Ottawa's population projections for this sub -area.
According to the City of Ottawa's calculations, this sub -area is expected to see an increase in the 0 -14
school age population by approximately 13% between 2001 and 2011.
The projected increase in the school -age population for this sub -area is due mainly to anticipated new
housing development in the area, namely Rockcliffe Mews area and the Rockcliffe Airbase lands. It
should be noted that development in the Rockcliffe Mews area has been ongoing for the last few
years. However, commencement on the redevelopment of the Rockcliffe Airbase lands has not yet
begun. The City of Ottawa is assuming that these lands will be developed over the next ten years. In
accordance with current attendance boundaries, students generated from these housing
developments are directed to schools located west of the Aviation Parkway (Ottawa West sub - area).
The recommendation to close Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School will reduce the number of
surplus pupil places in the Beacon Hill sub -area to approximately 330 and 'increase the area's
utilization from the current 75% to 81% in 2002/2003. Should enrolment at schools in this sub -area
continue to decline over the next five years, however, staff may need to consider further space
consolidation and attendance boundary/ program rationalization.
In addition, there is space available at the receiving schools, which are in close proximity to Lamira
Dow Billings Elementary School. The current utilizations, as of 31 October 2001, at Le Phare
Elementary School and Robert Hopkins Public School are below 55 %. Based on status quo projected
enrolments for September 2002, the utilizations at Le Phare Elementary School and Robert Hopkins
Public School are expected to remain below 60 %. The redirection of students from the Lamira Dow
Billings Elementary School attendance area to these schools will help to bolster utilizations at these
schools.
26 March 2002
F:
Le Phare Elementary School and Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School are Early French Immersion
Centres serving the Beacon Hill sub -area. Many of the students attending these two schools are
(bW bused due to "hazard designations ". As such, staff considered the impact if either facility was closed.
However, due to continued uncertainty around the potential redevelopment of the Rockcliffe Airbase
lands and other proposed developments, staff felt it would be prudent, at this time, to retain the
larger capacity facility.
A
D. Actual and Projected Enrolments and Utilizations of Affected Schools
i) Status quo projections and utilizations
School
Cap.
Port.
01/02
Grade/
Program
ADE
01/02
OF
(' %)
ADE
02/03
OF
NO
ADE
06/07
OF
CV0
Lamira Dow Billies
228.5
0
JK ENG /SK -5 EFI
186
81.40
170
74.40
158
69.15
Le Phare
338.5
0
JK ENG /SK -5 EFI
181
53.47
197.5
58.35
196
57.90
Robert Hopkins
460.5
0
JK -5 ENG
228 1
49.51
211
45.82
203
44.08
ii) Impact of the recommendation on "receiving" school's projections and utilizations
School
Grade/
Program
ADE
02/03
OF
11/11)
ADE
06/07
OF
%)
Le Phare
JK ENG /SK -5 EFI
211
62.33
220
64.99
Robert Hopkins
JK -5 ENG /EFl
367.5
79.80
336.5
73.07
E. STUDENT REDIRECTIONS
Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School JK ENG and SK -5 EFI students residing in the
Pineview /Cyrville area and a portion of the Beacon Hill South /Cardinal Heights area (between
Montreal Road and Ogilvie Road) would be redirected to Le Phare Elementary School, effective
September 2002. Refer to Map lII -1 - New Le Phare ES K -5 EFI Boundary. This redirection would
result in the relocation of approximately 90 (ADE) JK ENG and SK -5 EFI students for the 2002/2003
school year.
Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School JK ENG and SK -5 EFI students residing in a portion of the
Beacon Hill South /Cardinal Heights area (between Hwy 17 and Ogilvie Road) and the southerly
portion of the Beacon Hill North area would be redirected to Robert Hopkins Public School, effective
September 2002. Refer to Map III -2 - New Robert Hopkins PS K -5 EFI Boundary. This redirection
would result in the relocation of approximately 80 (ADE) JK ENG and SK -5 EFI students for the
2002/2003 school year.
26 March 2002
1•
Le Phare Elementary School JK ENG and SK -5 EFI students residing in the northerly portion of the
Beacon Hill North area would be redirected to Robert Hopkins Public School, effective 2002. Refer to
Map III -2 - New Robert Hopkins PS K -5 EFI Boundary. This redirection would result in the
relocation of approximately 75 (ADE) JK ENG and SK -5 EFI students for the 2002/2003 school year.
It should be noted that the students currently attending Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School on
student transfers would move en masse to their newly designated school.
For Current Attendance Boundary Maps of the closed and receiving schools, refer to Appendix F.
IMPACT ON PROGRAMS
The recommended closure of Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School would result in a program
delivery change to Robert Hopkins Public School. Robert Hopkins Public School would become a
dual track school adding the Early French Immersion program in September 2002.
There would be no change to the current English program attendance boundary for Robert Hopkins
Public School.
It should be noted, that Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School does not have a special education
system program that would be impacted by the closure of the school.
G. IMPACT ON CHILD CARE CENTRES
There is no impact on Child Care Centres as a result of the closure of Lamira Dow Billings
Elementary School.
H. IMPACT ON COMMUNITY
As of September 2002, the community will no longer have access to Lamira Dow Billings Elementary
School under this recommendation. Staff will consider the organizational needs and 'interests of these
groups in determining whether they can be accommodated in other schools located in relative close
proximity to Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School.
There is a total of 844 community use hours shown for Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School. The
school itself and the Board account for approximately 28.5 hours of use, with the remaining uses
consisting of various municipal, youth and private programs. Refer to Appendix E - Community Use
of Schools.
26 March 2002
W
Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School offers a variety of community groups and organizations its
facility for use. Staff realizes that the closure of Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School will have an
(6w impact on the community ui terms of available "school" space for community activities. However, it
should be noted that there are three OCDSB schools located in close proximity to Lamira Dow
Billings Elementary School, which may be available to the community for their use. In addition, there
are other community buildings such as the Earl Armstrong arena, the Splash Pool, the Beacon Hill
North Community Centre and the Potvin arena for community use.
Iq
I. IMPACT ON FACILITIES
In order to meet the approved timelines, staff did not recommend any closures, which would require
major renovations at the receiving schools. It should be noted, however, that Robert Hopkins Public
School is an open concept facility design incorporating three "pods ". One of the "pods" is closed and
could be used to accommodate the Early French Immersion program otherwise, minor renovations
may be required at the school.
Le Phare Elementary School currently has no portables on site. Based on the proposed redirection, it
is anticipated that no additional temporary accommodations would be required at Le Phare
Elementary School for the 2002/2003 school year.
Robert Hopkins Public School currently has no portables on site. Based on the proposed redirection,
it is anticipated that no additional temporary accommodations would be required at Robert Hopkins
Public School for the 2002/2003 school year.
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
The students residing in the Pineview /Cyrville area and the Beacon Hill South /Cardinal Heights
(between Montreal Road and Ogilvie Road) area, who are currently bused to Lamira Dow Billings
Elementary School, would be bused to Le Phare Elementary School. It is anticipated that no
additional transportation costs will be incurred as a result of the redirection of these students.
The students residing in the Beacon Hill North area, who currently walk to Lamira Dow Billings
Elementary School would be bused to Robert Hopkins Public School under this proposed
recommendation. Transportation costs for these students would be negligible since students from
this area are currently being bused to Robert Hopkins Public School for the English program.
The students residing in the Beacon Hill South /Cardinal Heights (between Highway 17 and Ogilvie
Road) area, who are currently bused to Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School, would be bused to
Robert Hopkins Public School for Early French Immersion. Transportation costs for these students
would be negligible since students from this area are currently being bused to Robert Hopkins Public
School for the English program.
26 March 2002
The students residing in the northerly portion of Beacon Hill North (east of Ogilvie Road) are
currently bused to Le Phare Elementary School for Early French Immersion. These students would
be bused to Robert Hopkins Public School under the recommended student redirection.
Transportation costs for these students would be negligible since these students are currently being
bused to Robert Hopkins Public School for the English program.
The students residing in the Beacon Hill North (west of Ogilvie Road) area currently attend Robert
Hopkins Public School for the English program and Le Phare Elementary School for the Early French
Immersion program. In accordance with the Board's guidelines for transportation of students, some
students, who currently walk to their designated school, may now qualify for transportation to their
newly designated school. Conversely, some students, who are currently bused to their designated
school may now be within walking distance of their newly designated. school. As such, staff does not
anticipate any increase in transportation costs for this area.
K. FINANCIAL IMPACT
Refer to Appendix C for a summary of the estimated financial savings should Lamira Dow Billings
Elementary School be approved for closure.
L. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
In the past, reviews for the Beacon Hill area have been undertaken twice. During those reviews, staff
has provided a great deal of data, analysis and information regarding closures options and resulting
student redirection options for schools in this area. For details refer to the following reports: a)
Report No. 99 -226 - Area Review /School Closure Study - Quadrant C Elementary School Closures;
b) Report No. 99 -269 - Final Staff Recommendations for Quadrant C of Phase III of the Elementary
School Area Review /School Closure Study; c) Report No. 00 -187 - Area Review /School Closure
Study - Recommendations for Elementary School Closures (Inside Greenbelt); d) Report No. 00 -261 -
Recommendations for Program and Student Relocations Arising out of the Closure of L.D. Billings
ES, Devonshire PS, Merivale PS and Mutchmor PS.
PART A - Other School Closure Alternative Considered
i) Closure of Le Phare Elementary School.
Staff believes that the rationale provided in the previous documents noted above is still valid for
this study.
In addition, the closure of Le Phare, the larger of the two facilities (L.D. Billings and Le Phare),
would not provide staff with as much flexibility to accommodate students generated from new
housing developments, such as the Rockcliffe Airbase, should the Board direct these students to
schools in the Beacon Hill sub -area.
26 March 2002
OWN
PART B - Other Boundary Alternatives Considered
Listed below are some of the options for student redirections staff examined as a result of the closure
(W
of Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School. Additional options, for this sub -area were examined in
previous reviews and the rationale noted is still valid.
i) Dual track Robert Hopkins Public School and redirect all Lamira Dow Billings
Elementary School enrolment to Robert Hopkins.
This proposal would increase the utilization at Robert Hopkins Public School to
approximately 83% for September 2002, however, it does not address the low utilization at Le
Phare Elementary School.
In addition, the Pineview /Cyrville area, which now attends Carson Grove for the English
program would be directed to Robert Hopkins for Early French Immersion. Any English
program students from this area would have to apply under the student transfer process to
attend Robert Hopkins Public School.
Staff did not pursue this proposal.
ii) Dual track Robert Hopkins Public School and Le Phare Elementary School and redirect
part of Lamira Dow Billing Elementary School enrolment to Robert Hopkins Public
School and part to Le Phare Elementary School.
The current English enrolment at Robert Hopkins is not large enough to create two viable
English program schools within the Beacon Hill sub -area. As a result, staff would have to
redirect a portion of the Carson Grove English program attendance area to Le Phare. To
ensure that there is a consistency between English program and Early French Immersion
program boundaries, staff considered redirecting the Pineview /Cyrville area, which now
attends Carson Grove to Le Phare for English and Early French Immersion.
There are approximately 200 English /Early French Immersion students residing in this area.
Based on projected enrolments for Le Phare Elementary School for September 2002, the
school's utilization would be approximately 118 %. Portable classrooms would be required
on site to accommodate the enrolment.
As a result, staff did not pursue this option.
iii) Redirect all of Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School enrolment to Le Phare EIementary
School.
The Early French Immersion enrolment at Lamira Dow Billings Elementary School is
projected to be approximately 170 (ADE) for September 2002. The projected enrolment at Le
Phare Elementary School, for September 2002, is expected to be approximately 200 (ADE).
This would result in a utilization of approximately 110% at Le Phare Elementary School.
Portable classrooms would be required on site to accommodate the enrolment.
In addition, this proposal does not address the low utilization at Robert Hopkins Public
School.
As such, staff did not pursue this proposal.
26 March 2002
A
0 1AWA-CAR ETON
ni vwicr cc uaa nI —
SECTION IV
Riverview Public School
Facilities and Physical PIanning
26 March 2002
90
•
OTTAWA-CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
q/
Recommended School Closures for 2002/2003 Arising From Budget 2002,/2003
School Name: I Riverview P.S. (Cumberland)
A. RECOMMENDATIONS
i) Close Riverview (Cumberland) Public School, effective September 2002;
ii) Redirect Riverview JK -8 ENG program to Trillium E.S; and
iii) Redirect Growth Area, East of Trim Road, to Fallingbrook C.E.S. for JK -8 ENG /EFI. Pupils
currently attending Riverview P.S. residing within this area be permitted to attend Trillium
and be provided transportation in accordance with applicable Board policies.
B. SCHOOL DESCRIPTION
Riverview P.S., built in 1959, is Iocated in Cumberland Village in the former City of Cumberland. Tile
school, which has a Ministry rated capacity of 229.5 pupil places, currently offers a JK -8 ENG
program and has an enrolment of 98 pupils as detailed below.
JK
SK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
TOTAL
12
6
8
13
8
15
11
9
4
12
98
(Uet.31/ -(X11 Enrolnieut)
C. RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
i) Based on October 31st, 2001 enrolment, Riverview P.S. has a utilization of approximately
38.8 %. Of the 98 pupils attending the school, 10 are out of boundary, including 6 attending
from "Out of the Board ". There are currently no Special Education system classes at Riverview
P.S.
ii) In September 1999, Riverview Public School increased its program offering to include grade 7
with grade 8 English phased in for the following year. Total enrolment in October 2000 with a
JK -8 English program offering was 118 pupils; despite the expanded program offering,
enrolment has continued to decline.
iii) The City of Ottawa's population projections, which will form the basis for the new City of
Ottawa Official Plan, forecast an overall decline of 9% in the 0 - 14 school -age population for
the Rural - Northeast Sub Area between 2001 and 2011 and a decline of 17.6% for the 5 -14 age
cohort. Please refer to Appendix D.
26 March 2002
A,
iv) The current attendance boundary for Riverview P.S. includes part of a new growth area of
Orleans that is associated with the urban area boundary. In 1988, the former BMOC Official
Plan was amended to include expanded Urban Area Land Designations, thereby designating
land within Riverview's attendance boundary as part of the "Urban Area ". Map IV - 1 reflects
the current urban area land designations for the former "City of Cumberland ", with a portion of
the Riverview P.S. attendance boundary superimposed.
v) In 2001, the Planning department was circulated draft subdivision plans for a new growth area,
located immediately East of Trim Road, North of Innes Road and West of Cardinal Creek. The
growth area forms part of the larger Orleans urban area boundary. Although the area has a
build out of approximately 1600 units, draft plans for nearly 1300 units are currently
proposed.
vi) Based on discussions with the developer and City Planning staff, it is believed that 50 units
may be built and occupied by September 2002. By September 2003, the area could contain 300
units. The 300 units represent the maximum number that can be built based on servicing
limitations. In subsequent years, it is assumed that 200 units /year would be built in the growth
area.
vii) Accordingly, based on these assumptions, the status quo projections incorporate an additional
8 pupils from 50 units by September, 2002 and 48 pupils from 300 units by September 2003.
With the assumption that 200 units /yr. would be built thereafter, this would generate
approximately 50 pupils per year. By 2006, it is assumed that 203 pupils would be generated
from a total of 900 dwelling units. Given that Fallingbrook is projected to experience declining
enrolment over the next few years, it is deemed appropriate to direct the growth area East of
Trim Road to it.
viii) While Maple Ridge is expected to undergo significant growth in the next few years, a number VJ
of future elementary school sites located South of Innes Road have been designated to serve
future growth. With the closure of Riverview, additional Grants for New Pupil Places would
be generated which could be used to fund future facility requirements in the area.
ix) In order to ensure that Maple Ridge does not become excessively overcrowded in the near
future, a review of attendance boundaries serving the Orleans growth area will be undertaken
to redirect future growth to schools in the Orleans urban area which currently have space, such
as Queenswood and Henry Larsen. (Current status quo projections for Maple Ridge indicate
that the school would be in the 147% range by 2006.)
x) Previous Approaches to Bolster Enrolment at Riverview
In 1999, the Board considered the potential closure of Riverview. A number of suggestions
were made by the community for bolstering enrolment including the addition of Grade 7 and 8
at Riverview, which, has had a limited effect. Other suggestions included expanding the
English program boundary of the school within the rural area. It was found that an expansion
southerly into the current Meadowview boundary would only serve to increase enrolment by
approximately a dozen pupils. The location of a future MFI program at Riverview was also
suggested; however, a more central location of the program within Orleans would have been
the preference. The community had also indicated at the time that, should a Riverview closure
be considered, all pupils within the Riverview English program boundary including Early
French Immersion pupils should be moved /relocated as a whole group. It was indicated at the
time that this would serve to threaten the Immersion program at Meadowview.
xi) In conclusion, the recommendation to close Riverview P.S. is consistent with the approach that 44
urban area growth is more appropriately directed to urban area schools. With this approach,
26 March 2002
qC3.
Riverview would continue to be significantly underutilized and, as such, is recommended for
closure.
xii) Appendix A reflects the impact of the Recommended Riverview P.S. closure on the Utilization's
for both the Rural Northeast and East Urban Community - Cumberland sub areas. With the
closure of Riverview, the Rural Northeast sub area increases in Utilization from 67.9'0 to 96.8%
for September 2002.
D. Actual and Projected Enrolments and Utilizations of Affected Schools
i) Status Quo Projections and Utilizations: (Appendix F details existing attendance boundaries)
Based on existing attendance boundaries, the East of Trim Road growth area would be directed as
follows:
JK -8 ENG Riverview SK -6 EFI Meadowview
7 -8 EFI Maple Ridge LFI Trillium
School
Cap.
Port.
01/02
Grade/
Program
ADE
01/02
OF
NO
ADE
02/03
OF
('%l)
ADE
06/07
OF
(' %,)
Riverview
229.5
239.5
JK -8 ENG
89
38.78
79
34.42
176.5
76.91
Meadowview
252.5
2 .
JK -6 ENG /EFI
262
103.76
248.5
98.42
322.5
127.72
Fallin brook
521.5
1 1
1 JK -8 ENG /EFI
1 534 1
102.4 1
512
98.18
437
83.80
Maple Ride
644.5
JK -8 ENG /EFI /5 /6Gift
561.5
87.12
625
96.97
946
146.78
Trillium
644.5
JK -8 ENG /EFI /LFI
524.5
81.38
505.5
78.43
515
79.91
Should the East of Trim Road growth area not be directed to Riverview for JK -8 ENG and
Meadowview for SK -6 EFI, these schools are projected to have the following enrolments:
School
Cap.
Port.
01/02
Grade/
Program
ADE
01/02
OF
NO
ADE
02/03
OF
NO
ADE
06/07
OF
(" /„)
Riverview
229.5
239.5
JK -8 ENG
89
38.78
75
32.68
76.5
33.33
Meadowview
252.5
2
JK -6 ENG /EFI
262
103.76
244.5
96.83
239.5
94.85
ii) Impact of the Recommendations on "Receiving" Schools' Projections and Utilizations:
School
Grade/
Program
ADE
02/03
OF
(' %)
ADE
06/07
OF
%)
Riverview
CLOSED
Meadowview
JK -6 ENG /EFI
244.5
196.83
239.5
94.85
Fallin brook
JK -8 ENG /EFI
520
99.71
637
122.15
Maple Ride
1K -8 ENG /EFI /5 /6Gift
625
96.97
929
144.14
Trillium
JK -8 ENG /EFI /LFI
580.5
90.07
591.5
91.78
E. STUDENT REDIRECTIONS ( PLEASE REFER TO MAP IV - 2)
It is recommended that Riverview's JK -8 student population be moved as a block to Trillium E.S.
It should be noted that the students currently attending Riverview P.S. on student transfers
would move en masse with the Riverview enrolment.
It is recommended that the growth area immediately East of Trim Road be directed to
Fallingbrook for JK -8 ENG /EFI. The recommended attendance boundary limits for the growth
area include 9 pupils that currently attend Riverview. It is recommended that these pupils have
the option to attend Trillium along with the main Riverview population.
26 March 2002
a4
o The recommendation to relocate Riverview's population as a whole would serve to minimize
student disruption. Based on current enrolment at Riverview, 86 JK -7 pupils would be relocated
to Trillium for September 2002. (Current Grade 7 pupils are not included as they graduate.) low)
F. IMPACT ON PROGRAMS
There are no program implications as Trillium already supports a JK -8 English program.
G. IMPACT ON CHILD CARE CENTRES
There is no impact on Child Care Centres as a result of the closure of Riverview Public School.
H. IMPACT ON COMMUNITY
hlformation contained within Appendix E, Community Use of Schools, reflects that Riverview P.S.
had a total of 220 hours of Community Use in the last school year. Over half of the hours are
attributable to "Municipal Use" which accounts for 133.5 hours. The "Community" is the next greatest
user having a total of 61 hours.
Under the recommended closure of Riverview Public School, the community will no longer have
access to this facility. It may be possible to accommodate the Riverview Community uses at another
OCDSB school, at a school operated by another Board, or at another facility in the area.
I. IMPACT ON FACILITIES
In order to meet the approved timelines, staff did not recommend any closures which would require
major renovations at the receiving school(s).
The recommendation to relocate the Riverview pupil population to Trillium will serve to increase the
utilization at Trillium to approximately 90 %. Based on this level of utilization and subject to
refinements in the staffing projection, it is anticipated that no portables would be required.
J. IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
While it is anticipated that there will be no increase in transportation costs associated with the
recommendation, Riverview P.S. pupils that are currently within walking distance to Riverview will
now require approximately a half hour bus ride to Trillium E.S.
K. FINANCIAL IMPACT
Please refer to Appendix C which details the financial savings associated with the Recommended
closure of Riverview P.S.
L. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
The relocation of the Riverview P.S. pupil population to Trillium is recommended given available
space at Trillium E.S. and, accordingly, no other options were considered.
26 March 2002
1E
7u-�-
Onnwn CAR[E10N
ni.nac* Ic I",n --,
SECTION V
J. S. Woodsworth Secondary School
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
96.
OTTAWA- CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Recommended School Closures for 2002/03 Arising From 2002103 Budget
School Name: J.S. Woodsworth Secondary School
A. RECOMMENDATIONS
i) Close J.S. Woodsworth Secondary School, effective September 2002.
ii) Redirect J.S. Woodsworth grades 9 -OAC students residing north of Colonnade Road (north)
to Laurentian High School.
iii) Redirect J.S. Woodsworth grades 9 -OAC students residing south of Colonnade Road (north)
to Merivale High School.
iv) Relocate the Special Education Developmental Disability system program to Laurentian High
School.
V) Repatriate J.S. Woodsworth 'but of boundary" grades 9 -OAC students to their home schools.
vi) Redirect the (former) Gloucester portion of the Merivale attendance boundary to Ridgemont
High School on a phased basis, beginning with grade 9 in 2002/03.
vii) Redesignate the Merivale /South Carleton optional area to a Merivale /South Carleton/
Ridgemont optional area, effective September 2002.
B. SCHOOL DESCRIPTION
J.S. Woodsworth Secondary School is located at 159 Chesterton Drive, at the corner of Viewmont
Drive, in the former city of Nepean. The school was built in 1973 and has a capacity of 747. In the
2001/02 school year, J.S. Woodsworth offered a grades 9 -OAC English /Immersion /Extended French
program, in addition to a Special Education (Developmental Disability) system program.
C. RATIONALE FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
i) Staff has developed preliminary secondary school review areas for the purposes of the Long
Term Accommodation Plan (see Appendix B). J.S. Woodsworth is included in the "Ottawa
West & Merivale" review area. Based on 2001/02 enrolments, this review area has a
relatively low overall utilization of 91.94%. There are two other review areas that currently
have overall utilizations of less than 95 %, however, there are no viable alternatives for
redirecting students in those areas, under a 2002/03 secondary school closure scenario.
26 March 2002
q ).
ii) There is space available at adjacent schools in close proximity to J.S. Woodsworth to
accommodate J.S. Woodsworth students, based on the recommended student redirections
(see section "E" for details).
iii) During the recent OCDSB budget discussions, The Ottawa Carleton Secondary School
Administrators Network ( OCSSAN) made a presentation to the Board supporting the need
for secondary school closures /consolidations in order to allow for larger school populations,
which OCSSAN believes will result in more viable programs under Secondary School Reform
(SSR). The OCSSAN presentation included the following statement:
"It is the consensus of principals that under SSR schools will need between 1100 -1200 pupils
to provide a viable versatile program. The larger populous:
• Enhances the ability of schools to deliver a more diversified curriculum which will meet
the needs of all students.
• Permits a multi- streamed and multi- optional opportunity for all students."
iv) J.S. Woodsworth is a secondary school that would not be able to meet the OCSSAN guideline
of 1100 -1200 pupils. It is projected to have 654 students (ADE= 620.65) in 2003/04, following
the graduation of the double cohort. This enrolment is projected to grow slightly to 663
students (ADE = 629.19) by 2006/07. Perhaps more importantly, J.S. Woodsworth has a
capacity of only 747 and would therefore be unable to accommodate an enrolment level at or
near the 1100 -1200 student range.
V) The recommended changes would have a positive impact on the utilization and programs at
Laurentian High School. The utilization at Laurentian would increase from 53.47% to 95.90%
in 2002/03. The Laurentian Immersion /Extended French program would be extended from
grades 9 -10 to grades 9 -OAC in 2002/03 and the viability of the program would be
strengthened (see section "F" for details).
vi) The redirection of the (former) Gloucester portion of the Merivale attendance boundary to
Ridgemont High School, on a phased basis, would have the following positive impacts:
a) It would create additional space at Merivale to accommodate J.S. Woodsworth
students.
b) It would help to reduce accommodation pressure at Merivale as a result of enrolment
growth from the Longfields /Davidson Heights area, which has been directed to
Merivale pending the construction of a secondary school in this area.
C) Ridgemont is more accessible to the majority of students residing in this area.
d) It would have a positive impact on the utilization and programs at Ridgemont. The
utilization at Ridgemont would 'increase from 78.70% to 88.82% in 2002/03. The
Ridgemont Immersion/ Extended French program (to be introduced at grade 9 in
2002/03) and Gifted system program would both be strengthened (see section "F" for
details).
vii) The redesignation of the Merivale /South Carleton optional area to a Merivale /South
Carleton /Ridgemont optional area is being recommended in response to a Board decision on
January 17, 2002 in connection with the Osgoode / Rideau/ South Gloucester elementary
boundary study. One of the Board decisions in that study was to redirect students residing MJ
26 March 2002
in a portion of the Riverside South Community from Rideau Valley MS to Elizabeth Park PS
for grades 6 -8. Under recommendation vi) in this report, the Elizabeth Park Community
would be redirected from Merivale High School to Ridgemont High School. Because the area
that was redirected to Elizabeth Park PS in the January 17th Board decision is also part of the
current Merivale /South Carleton optional area, redesignating this optional area to a
Merivale /South Carleton /Ridgemont optional area would allow the opportunity for
students from the Riverside Park Comunity to attend Ridgemont with their classmates,
following the completion of grade 8 at Elizabeth Park.
D. Actual and Projected Enrolments and Utilizations of affected schools
i) Status Quo projections and utilizations
ii) Impact on "receiving" schools' projections and utilizations
School
Projected
Port's
Current
ADE
OF
ADE
OF
ADE
OF
ADE
OF
School
Cap.
01/02
Grade/
01/02
('%,)
02,/03
NO
03/04
(' %)
06/07
9 -OAC ENG;
Program
Laurentian
9 -OAC IMM /EF;
1096.10
95.90°%
J.S.
86.30%
933.26
9 -OAC
SPEC ED
Woodsworth
747
0
ENG /IMM /EF;
727.88
97.44'.
71227
95.35°
620.65
83.09"%
629.19
84.23%
1256.67
9227%
1130.25
SPEC ED
GIFTED
9 -OAC ENG;
9 -OAC ENG;
Ridgemont
9ININI /EF
860.63
88.82%
Laurentian
1143
0
9IMM /EF;
630.71
55.18%
611.12
53.47°%
562.60
49.22°%
504.75
44.169.
SPEC ED
SPEC ED
9 -CAC
Merivale
1362
0
ENG /IMM /EF;
1288.96
94.64%
1351.40
9922%
1297.34
95.25%
1362.58
100 -114%
GIFTED
9 -OAC ENG;
Ridgemont
969
0
GIFTED;
707.73
73.04%
762.60
78.70%
733.77
75.72°%
705.87
72.85%
SPEC ED
ii) Impact on "receiving" schools' projections and utilizations
School
Projected
ADE
OF
ADE
OF
ADE
OF
Grade/
02/03
N1.)
03/04
(' %.)
06/07
NO
Program
9 -OAC ENG;
Laurentian
9 -OAC IMM /EF;
1096.10
95.90°%
986.36
86.30%
933.26
81.65%
SPEC ED
9 -OAC
Merivale
ENG /IMM /EF;
1407.11
103.31%
1256.67
9227%
1130.25
82.98°%
GIFTED
9 -OAC ENG;
Ridgemont
9ININI /EF
860.63
88.82%
910.11
93.92,).
1075.42
110.98
GIFTED;
SPEC ED
E. STUDENT REDIRECTIONS
i) A projected 470 J.S. Woodsworth grades 9 -OAC students residing north of Colonnade Road
(north) would be redirected to Laurentian High School, effective September 2002 (see map V-
1).
ii) A projected 58 J.S. Woodsworth grades 9 -OAC students residing south of Colonnade Road
(north) would be redirected to Merivale High School, effective September 2002 (see map V -1).
26 March 2002
qq
It can be seen on map V -1 that this redirection area actually includes Colonnade Road (north)
itself. However, there are no students residing on this road, since it is part of an industrial
park. Therefore, the wording in the recommendation does not refer to the redirection of
students on Colonnade Road (north) itself.
iii) The Special Education (DD) system program at J.S. Woodsworth would be relocated to
Laurentian High School, effective September 2002. This decision was made following
consultation with the Special Education /Student Services Department.
iv) A projected 212 'but of boundary" grades 9 -OAC J.S. Woodsworth students would be
repatriated to their home schools, effective September 2002.
V) The (former) Gloucester portion of the Merivale attendance boundary would be redirected to
Ridgemont High School on a phased basis, beginning with grade 9 in 2002/03 (see map V -2).
vi) The Merivale /South Carleton optional area would be redesignated the Merivale /South
Carleton /Ridgemont optional area, effective September 2002 (see map V -3).
The recommended closure of J.S. Woodsworth would result in the disruption of an estimated 600
students. This figure includes 590 projected grades 10 -OAC students and 10 Special Education (DD)
system program students.
F. IMPACT ON PROGRAMS
i) The recommended changes would extend the Laurentian Immersion/ Extended French
program from grades 9 -10 to grades 9 -OAC in 2002/03. This program would have a 2002/03
enrolment of approximately 120 students, with some additional program growth expected
over the next two years as the phase -in of the former Nepean Immersion/ Extended French
area to Laurentian is completed.
ii) The Developmental Disabilities (DD) system program at J.S. Woodsworth would be relocated
to Laurentian. This decision was made following consultation with the Special
Education/ Student Services Department. These students are being relocated to a school
which will provide for the appropriate learning environment and resources for the students
in that program.
iii) The phase -in of the (former) Gloucester portion of the Merivale attendance boundary to
Ridgemont would help to strengthen both the Immersion/ Extended French program (to be
introduced at grade 9 in 2002/03) and the Gifted system program at Ridgemont. There are
currently 36 Immersion/ Extended French and 13 Gifted system program students who reside
in this area and attend Merivale.
G. IMPACT ON CHILD CARE CENTRES
There is no impact on Child Care Centres as a result of the closure of J.S. Woodsworth Secondary
School.
H. IMPACT ON COMMUNITY
Appendix E includes a summary of "community use" hours at J.S. Woodsworth Secondary School for
the last school year.
26 March 2002
/oo
There is a total of 1457.50 community use hours shown for J.S. Woodsworth. The school itself and the
Board account for approximately 770 hours of use, with the remaining uses consisting of various
(W youth and community programs.
Under the recommended closure of J.S. Woodsworth, the community would no longer have access to
this facility. It may be possible to accommodate the J.S. Woodsworth community uses at another
OCDSB school, at a school operated by another Board or at another community facility in the area.
I. IMPACT ON FACILITIES
In order to meet the approved timelines, staff did not recommend any closures that would require
major renovations at the receiving school(s).
The recommended changes would increase the utilization at Merivale, from 99.22% to 103.31% and
at Sir Robert Borden (repatriation impact) from 103.52% to 106.10 %, in 2002/03. These slightly higher
utilizations would increase the probability that these schools may require a portable(s). However,
any portable requirements for 2002/03 would be eliminated in 2003/04, following the graduation of
the double cohort.
Under the recommended changes, the utilization at Ridgemont would gradually increase to 110.98%
by 2006/07. Ridgemont could, therefore, potentially require portables over the longer term,
assuming there are no additional boundary adjustments in the interim.
It should be noted that the utilizations shown for Laurentian under the recommended changes are
based on Laurentian's total capacity of 1143. These utilizations would be higher if an adjustment
were made to exclude the six rated rooms currently used by Mchugh School. Laurentian's projected
utilization level for 2002/03 with the Mchugh rooms excluded from the calculation is 107.78 %.
Laurentian may therefore require portables for 2002/03, however these portable requirements would
be eliminated in 2003/04, following the graduation of the double cohort.
J. IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
Within the urban transit area, the Board only provides bus passes to secondary students who are
deemed to be financially disadvantaged. Any impact on transportation costs /savings would
therefore be minimal.
In general, J.S. Woodsworth students redirected to Merivale would have a slightly improved level of
accessibility. For the J.S. Woodsworth students redirected to Laurentian, those residing within the
immediate vicinity of J.S. Woodsworth would have a slightly longer walk, whereas those residing
closer to Baseline Road would have a slightly shorter walk. The majority of students residing within
the (former) Gloucester portion of the current Merivale attendance boundary would benefit from the
improved accessibility to Ridgemont.
K. FINANCIAL IMPACT
Please refer to Appendix C.
26 March 2002
la'
L. OTHER ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
It should be noted that staff considered the option of redirecting the (former) Gloucester portion of
the Merivale attendance boundary to Ridgemont High School for grades 9 -OAC, effective September
2002 (no phase -in). This option has not been recommended for the following reasons:
a) There are currently 329 students from this area attending Merivale High School, including
240 grades 9 -11 students. Without phasing, all returning students would be required to
move to Ridgemont, effective September 2002. This was considered to be an unacceptable
level of disruption.
b) Without phasing, the utilization level at Ridgemont would be 115.50 %, effective September
2002. With a phased approach, the utilization at Ridgemont would increase only gradually
and reach 110.98% by 2006/07. This would allow more time for staff to monitor the
enrolment growth at Ridgemont and to respond to any overcrowding concerns, as required.
C) The current plan at Ridgemont is to introduce an Immersion/ Extended French program on a
phased basis, beginning with grade 9 in 2002/03. If the (former) Gloucester portion of the
Merivale attendance boundary is not redirected to Ridgemont on a phased basis, Ridgemont
would be required to provide a grades 10 -OAC Immersion/ Extended French program for
only 20 projected Immersion/ Extended French students from this area.
26 March 2002
ItF.,
2 AV cA0.(F fU�
APPENDIX A
City of Ottawa Sub -Area Utilization
Elementary
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
The Ottawa- Carleton District School Board
Summary of Elementary Panel Utilization by City of Ottawa Sub -Areas
1725 54.896 97 183.5 58.396 197 62.5% 1 63.5 � 62.5
'Total 207 51985 46415.5 47158.75 90.7'%, 47057.1 90.5'iS� 46831.5 90.1'%, 46831.5
Notes:
(1) the Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
(2) 'I he MOG Capacity is used to determine eligibility for Grants for New Pupil Places (GNPP) .
(3) "I he urilizatirnl factor (UF) is calculated as 11011o,ss: ADE/ Planning Capacity.
(4) 1 he utilization factor (CIF) is calculated as rollo,cs: ADE/ Ministry Capacity
the runnier ol'portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
-1 he estimated average daily enrolment (Est ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
lope„cll PS capacity 01,800 is tempoary for 2002/03 school year.
Adrienne Clarkson GS planning capacity is 742 based on current use of school
Sn,necrest I'S canacily does not include 269 nund nlaces ,yhich will he added in Sentemher 2002.
0
Historical,
Actual and
Status Quo
Projections
impact of
Recommendations
Sub -Areas
1'
Planning
Capacit)•
(1)
MOE
Capacit*
(2)
2000/2001
200112001
2002/2003
2002/2003
ADE
OF ( %)
(3)
Est. ADE
OF (' %.)
(3)
Est. ADE
IT
(3) °)
Est. ADE
liF ( " / „)
(3)
OF (' % „)
W)
Alta Vista
16
5630.5
5630.5
5320.25
92.7 °,6
5153
91.5 °,6
5035
89.4%
51135
c
8).4 "b
59436
liayshorc
n
1755.5
1755.5
1412.25
SO. 4 °6
13585
77.446
1325
75.696
1189.5
77.53b
77.5"i,
Beacon ltill
3
2208
2208
1724.75
78.1 °6
1649
74.7%
1608.5
72.89L
1608.5
81.3 "6
81.V %.
Cedarvie,y
14
3932
3932
3644.00
92.740
3513.5
89.496
3451
87.8%
3655.5
r )3.01 ,
93.(13„
Ce ----- and Inner
I
3S9i.5
1007
3204.25
52.296
3307.6
84.9%
3363
56.3 "�
3363
86.3 ".,
83.9 "6
hint Club
8
4215.5
3751
3552.50
91.446
3747.5
SS.9 °�
3755.5
89.19.;
3755.5
89.13E
100113
KIcrivalc
18
4692
4692
4177.50
89.046
3769
80.3%
3933.5
83.8 °�
3755.5
86.7" ;,
86.7 "a
OlGnya Gast
1
2261.5
2261.5
1821.75
80.6°6
1948
86.196
1892
53.7%
1892
83.7 °;,
83.7 ".6
Ottawa Nest
8
4602
4602
3722.25
80.9%
3768.5
81.996
3777
82.1%
3889
84.5 "1,
84.5 ".,
Inside Greenbelt Sub Total
71
33194.5
32842.5
28779.5
28214.6
85.0 %i
28143.5
28143.5
86.9"%,
87.9' %i
FMC Gast (Cumberland)
7
2545.5
1301.5
2280.50
2298.5
90.390
2279
595%
3,�
'- (_
�. °
)_ 8 "
131.1 36
GUC West (Gloucester)
4
2395.5
856.5
2022 25
84.446
1883.5
78.646
1811.5
75.6%
15115
75.636
2114.3'56
Leitrim
0
0
0
0
0.0%
0
0.096
0
0.096
0
(1.11%
0.0' ±.
Rural Northeast
2
453
452
371.75
77.146
351
72.5%
32 7.5
67.946
2}4.5
96.8'%
96.8%
RuralNorthwcst
19
1255
1255
14975
116.5%
1501
116.5;6
1429
111.2 °.
1429
1112%
11129
Rural Southeast
11
1383
1383
1512
109.3%
1508.5
109.1%
1469
106.2%
1469
1062%
106.2
Rural Southwest
12
21195
2119.5
203725
96.1%
2133.5
100.796
2159
101.9"6
2159
101.9 16
101.9 " /.,
SUC East
0
0
0
0
0.0%
0
O.11%
0
0.0%
0
(L (19f,
0.0 ",6
SUC West
18
3013.5
150(1
2378.00
78.996
2785.5
92. 446
2755
o
91.5,0
2758
91.51.1;,
153.91,
Stittsvillc
12
1043.5
1043.5
1248
119.6%
12115
116.1%
1200
115.0
1200
115.0 ",6
115.096
IVcst Urban Community North
27
1309.5
1255
1864.5
142.4%
1897
144.9%
19595
149.646
1959.5
149.6 ",6
1525
West Urban Community South
24
2598.5
1472
2995
103.346
3089
106.6%
3098.5
106.9 "6
3098.5
1069 ',1.
2t0.5%
Outside Greenbelt Sub Tatal
136
18475.5
13258
18206.75
98.5'%.
18659
101.0' %,
90.790
18491
46634.5
100.1' %
90.3%
18491
101.3'%
141.9'%
I:Icnrcntar)' Sub Tot t1
Clifford Rn,. ., 7_17
2117
51670
46100.5
46986.25
90.996
46373.6 1
F 46634.5
92.1 ",6
103.596
1725 54.896 97 183.5 58.396 197 62.5% 1 63.5 � 62.5
'Total 207 51985 46415.5 47158.75 90.7'%, 47057.1 90.5'iS� 46831.5 90.1'%, 46831.5
Notes:
(1) the Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
(2) 'I he MOG Capacity is used to determine eligibility for Grants for New Pupil Places (GNPP) .
(3) "I he urilizatirnl factor (UF) is calculated as 11011o,ss: ADE/ Planning Capacity.
(4) 1 he utilization factor (CIF) is calculated as rollo,cs: ADE/ Ministry Capacity
the runnier ol'portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
-1 he estimated average daily enrolment (Est ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
lope„cll PS capacity 01,800 is tempoary for 2002/03 school year.
Adrienne Clarkson GS planning capacity is 742 based on current use of school
Sn,necrest I'S canacily does not include 269 nund nlaces ,yhich will he added in Sentemher 2002.
0
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board /6-)//,
ALTA VISTA
w
2002 /2003
Est. ADE
Historical. Actual and Status Quo Projections
552.5
Year
267
Plannin«Ca
Current
2000 /2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
OCDSB Schools
107.2%
P
111.1%
Grade S
75.5'X,
465
75.1'5.
535.5
100.3%
305
100.8 ",0
Built
88.01%
parity
87.4%
5035 1
39.4
Program
AIDE
OF (' %.)
Est. ADE
OF (' %,)
Est. ADE
OF (1 %)
.IK -8 ENG
Alta Vista
SK-8 ER
1947
0
730
567.5
7 7. 7
57
76.3%
552.5
75.7%
7 -S LFI
Arch St.
1959
0
336
JK -6 ENG
269.25
S0.11S111
282
83.91X.
267
79.5%.
JK ENG
Bayview
1951
0
302.5
SK -4 EFI
213.75
70.7%
211
69.8%
215
71.1%
Charles llulse
195.1
2
549.5
JK -6 ENG
543.75
99.01A
550
100.1'%
555.5
101.1%
6 -8 ENG
Emily Carr
1972
3
437.5
6 -8 ER
458.5
104.8%
474
108.3%
469
107.2%
JK -8 ENG
Featherston
1964
5
445.5
4 -S M Fl
549.5
123.3%
521.5
117.1%
495
111.1%
General Vanier
1963
0
229
1K -3 ENG
173.5
75.811X.
175.5
76.61;4.
173
75.5%.
1K -5 ENG
Glen Ogilvie
1968
0
619.5
SK -5 ER
524.5
84.7'X,
488
78.8%
465
75.1%
JK -8 ENG
Hawthorne
1960
5
534
5 -8 G. ENG
591.25
110.71X,
569.5
106.6%
535.5
100.3%
1K ENG
Pleasant Pk
1960
1
302.5
SK -6 ER
313
103.5'X.
307
101.5/„
305
100.8%
venliew Ott
1953
0
399.5
JK -6 ALT
380.25
95.2 /
362
90.6151f.
351.5
88.0%,
1K -8 ENG
Vincent Massey
1958
0
745
SK -S EFI
635.5
55.3%
655.5
88.(1'%
651
87.4%
5 -8 G. ER
Sub -Total
16
5630.5
5220.25 1
92.7
5153 1
91.5
5035 1
39.4%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01 /02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002 /2003
Est. ADE
OF ('Y,,)
552.5
75.71.
267
79.5116
215
71.1'io
555.5
101.1%
469
107.2%
495
111.1%
173
75.5'X,
465
75.1'5.
535.5
100.3%
305
100.8 ",0
351.5
88.01%
651
87.4%
5035 1
39.4
166- Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
B
AYSHORE
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes rclocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and ]cased facilities.
Tlm number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilisation factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
OCDSB Schools
Year
Built
P
Plannim,Ca
pacity
Current
Grade &
Program
200012001
200112002
2002/2003
ADE
LIF (I %)
Est. ADE
OF (' %,)
Est. ADE
OF ( " /„)
Bayshore
1965
0
632.5
.IK -5 ENG
S.I -5 EFI
463.75
73.3%
457.5
72.3%
460.5
72.34%
Grant
1920
1 2
253
JK -6 ALT
274
103.34
1 271.5
107.3%
277.5
109.7%
Lakeview
1964
0
220
.IK ENG
SK -5 ER
167?5
76.0%
156.5
71.1%
149.5
65.0°.1,
Retina
196i
0
311
.IK -6 ENG
230
74.Mi,
225.5
72.5y„
224
72.0'56
Severn
1960
0
339
.1K -6 ENG
277.25
R1.S'S6
247.5
73.01,"
216.5
619 %,
Sub -Tot21
2
17-55,5
1412.25
80.4%
1358.5
77.4% 1
1328
75.6'%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes rclocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and ]cased facilities.
Tlm number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilisation factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
OF (%)
471.5
74.59/a
=6.56
1189.5 1
77.5/
R1
C
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board A)V
BEACON HILL
r
2002/2003
Est. ADE
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
423
Ycar
607
PlanningCa
Current
2000 /2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
OCDSB Schools
79.815.,
1'
81.3
Grade &
ADE
U ( " /,)
Est. ADE
OF (' %,)
Est. ADE
OF
Built
pacity
Program
Carson Grove
1972
388
JK -5 ENG
452.25
116.6';6
440
113A"
423
109.0 " /„
6 -8 ENG
6 -8 EFI
Henry Munro
1966
0
792.5
7 -8 LFI
629
79.4%
614
77.5%
607
76.6%
7 -8 G. ENG
JK ENG
L.D. Billings
1971
it
228.5
SK -5 EFI
215.5
94.3%
186
81.4%
170
74.4%
JK ENG
Le Phare
1975
0
338.5
SK -5 EFI
184.75
54.6%
181
53.5%
197.5
58.3%
Robcrt Ho kins
1971 1
0
-160.5
JK -5 ENG
243.25
52.8 1!4.
228
49.5%
211
45.8';.,
Sub -Total
1
3
2208
1724.75
78.1%
1619
74.7 %, 1
1608.5
728%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FfE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
OF ('%,)
423
109.0156
607
76.6%
n/a
n/a
211
62.33.,
367.5 1
79.815.,
1608.5 1
81.3
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board
QCEDARVIEW
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and ]cased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as 101lows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Est. ADE
Year
5'3
Plannin,,Ca
Current
2000 /2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
OCDSB Schools
104.3';0
1'
84.4%
Grade &
ADE
OF (' %)
Est. ADE
OF (' %))
Est.
OF (' %,)
97.7%
Built
93.0%
pacit}
Proeram
ADE
Bell's Corners
1953
0
519
JK -i ENG
428
82 "6
384.5
74.1 "0
384.5
74.1 °,4I
Briarg-reen
1970
2
400
JK -6 FNG
453.2i
1 13.3 "L
414.5
103.6",
39i.5
98.9'/0
Christie
1970
0
249.5
JK -6 ENG
166.5
66.T5.,
162
64.9%
162
64.9%
6 -8 ENG
D.A. Mood1e
1970
6
532
6 -8 EFI
569.5
107.0%
584
109.8%
555
104.3`%
7 -8 LFl
7 -8 ENG
Greenbank
7 -8 EFI
1967
0
584
7 -8 LFI
517.5
85.6%
500
85.6%
493
54.490
7 -8 G. EFI
JK ENG
SK -6 EFI
Knosdale
1967
0
412
4 -6 MFl
368
89.3%
394
95.6'%,
400.5
97.2%
5 -6 G. EFI
Leslie Pk
1966
0 1
302.5
.IK -6 17NG
170.5
56.4%
183.5 1
60.74, 1
183.5
60.7%
JK -6 ENG
Manordalc
1960
4
383.5
SK -6 EFI
445.5
116.2%
411
107.2%
406
105.9%
Pinecrest
1962
2
549,5
,IK -8 ENG
525?5
95.0%
380
57.41%
471
35.746,
Sub -Total
1
lot T
3932
3644.00
92.7%
3513.5
89.4%
3151 1
87.8%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and ]cased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as 101lows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
5'3
100.3 111.
395.5
98.945,
162
555
104.3';0
493
84.4%
400.5
97.250
183.5
60.7"x6
406
105.9%
537
97.7%
3655.5
93.0%
R1
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
CENTRAL AND INNER
(tes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (LIF) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Hopewell PS capacity of 800 is temporary for 2002/03 school year.
AJ69.
Impact of
Recommendation
2002/2003
Est. ADE
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
298.5
Year
280
PlanningCa
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
OCDSB Schools
97.5%
P
102.1%
Grade S
65.4%
305.5
73?%
182
101.4'%,
320.5
52.6%
Built
86.3
pacitc
Program
ADE
OF ('%,)
Est. ADE
(IF (' %)
Est. ADE
OF ('%,)
Cambridge
1974
0
335.5
JK -6 ENG
3112.25
90.1"11,
303.5
90.il!
298.5
820%
Centennial
1966
1 0
337
1 JK -6 ENG
265.25
78.7';6
1 260
77.21"d,
280
83.1'X.
JK -6 ENG
Elain St.
1953
0
262
SK -6 EFI
186
71.0%
220
84.015;,
232.5
88.7%
JK ENG
First Avenue
SK -6 EFI
1952
0
424.5
302.5
71.3 " /
303
71.4%
310.5
73.1%
5 -6 G. EFI
7 -8 ENG
Glashan
1979
0
385.5
7-8 LFI
330.5
85.7%
334
86.6"/
376
97.5%
7 -8 G. ENG
JK -8 ENG
Hopewell
SK -8 EFI
1996
0
800
4 -5 MFI
728.75
91.1'%,
807.5
100.9%
817
102.1%
7 -8 G. EFI
Lady Evelyn
1991
0
368
JK -6 ALT
274.5
74.61%.
260
70.71%
240.5
65.4"6,
1K -6 ENG
Mutchmor
1911
0
417.5
1 -6 G. ENG
321.25
76.9%
3.33
82?%
305.5
73.2%
V. Alexander
1950
1
179.5
JK -6 ENG
188
104.711N,
172.1
95.9`.4.
182
101.4%
York
1921
0
388
1K -8 ENG
305.25
78.7%,
304.5
78.5'%.
320.5
82.6"/
-Total
1
3897.5 1
3104.15
82.2%
3307.6
84.91Y
3363
86.3'%
(tes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (LIF) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Hopewell PS capacity of 800 is temporary for 2002/03 school year.
AJ69.
Impact of
Recommendation
2002/2003
Est. ADE
l F ('%,
298.5
89.0'%
280
53.1"
2315
SS.7%
310.5
73.1`50
376
97.5%
S17
102.1%
240.5
65.4%
305.5
73?%
182
101.4'%,
320.5
52.6%
3363 1
86.3
/09
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
HUNT CLUB
Notes:
The Plannning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as lbllows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Es1.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendation
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
CDSB Schools
Year
P
I'Iannin -Ca
e
Current
2000/2001
2001/3002
2002/2003
[Dunl:op
Buill
288
pacity
Grade S
84.4 1/u
516
107.4%
650
102.8%
3755.5
89.1
Program
ADE
OF ('%,)
Est. ADE
OF (' %,)
Est. ADE
OF
lossom 1'k
1956
0
449
JK -S ENG
30(;.2_5
6S.' "-6
274.5
6 1. 1 `5..
288.5
64.3'x,
19 70
0
351
.1K -6 ENG
397.5
54.81s;,
308
87.7';6
300
85.5130
JK -8 ENG
Elizabeth Pk.
1962
0
412.5
SK -3 EFI
277?5
67.21'/o
301.5
73.1 rb
335
81.9%
4 -8 ENG
Fielding Dr.
1968
0
651.5
5 -8 EFI
593
91.01;/0
543
83?%
535
82.1%
R.B. Cunt/
1976
0
330
JK -6 ENG
318.5
99.5' ;S.
393
91.6 °.b
285
90.0 %,
JK -6 ENG
Robert Bateman
1990
0
639.5
SK -6 EFI
571.75
89.4%
55(1.5
57.0%
540
84.4'%
.IK -S ENG
Roberta Bondar
1995
5
760
SK -8 EFI
817.25
107.5%
810.5
106.6%
:8:1 6
107.4%
.1K -8 ENG
Sawmill Creek
1996
3
�i32
SK -8 EFI
7 -8 LFI
671
�0
106._ /0
661.5
0
104.7 /0
650
102.8%
Sub -Total
8
4215.5
3852.50
91.4%
3747.5
88.9%
3755.5
89.1
Notes:
The Plannning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as lbllows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Es1.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendation
2002/2003
Est. ADE
1IF
288.5
64.3" o
300
S5.5 °u
338
81.9%
535
83.1°,o
288
90.0%
540
84.4 1/u
516
107.4%
650
102.8%
3755.5
89.1
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board Ile
M ERIVALE
Notes:
is Planning capacity includes rclocatablc classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
ie number ol'portahles (P) is based on 01/03 Final Portable Allocations.
he utilization factor (UF) is calculated aS Follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
557.;
111.9%
275.5
65.9%
Current
2000/2001
3001/2002
2002 /2003
202
Year
458
PlanningCa
320
712X.
343.5
75.8%
OCDSB Schools
95.1%
1'
76.6'%,
Grade S
ADE
l�F (' %�)
Est. ADE
OF (' % )
Est. ADE
„
OF O
( /
Built
pact}
Program
JK -6 ENO
Acincourt
19;8
4
498
SK -6 ER
567'5
113.9'-
556.5
111.7 °,L
557.5
111.9'.0
Carleton Heiehts
1947
(1
41 S
JK -8 ENO
263.15
63.0':•„
170
64.6' ;;
275.5
65.9" •„
CenlLlry
1967
1
473.5
JK -6 ENO
427'5
425
SU8' '
416.5
88.0%
7 -8 ENO
J.H. Putman
1960
0
361
7 -S EFI
199.5
55.3`50
179
49.6'5;,
188
52.1%
McGreeor Easson
1964
2
229
.1K -6 ENO
231
100.9150
204.5
89.3',,
202
88.2 %,
Meadowlands
1958
4
460.5
JK -6 ENO
502.75
109 2%.
492
106.5", ,
458
99.5%
JK ENO
Merivale
1953
7
449.5
SK -6 EFI
535
119.0%
180.5
40.2 /,
320
71.2%
JK ENO
Parkwood I lills
1963
0
436
SK -6 EFI
350.5
50.41;5,
344
78.9%
343.5
78.8%
7 -8 ENO
S.W. Churchill
1965
0
679.5
7-8 EFI
640.5
94.3%
631
92.9'%,
646
95.1%
7 -8 LFI
W.E. Gowling
1947
0
687
JK -6 ENO 1
460.5
67.0%.
486.5
70.5% 1
526.5
76.6'%,
Sub -Total
18
4692
1
5177.50
89.0%
3769
80.3
3933.5
83.9%
Notes:
is Planning capacity includes rclocatablc classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
ie number ol'portahles (P) is based on 01/03 Final Portable Allocations.
he utilization factor (UF) is calculated aS Follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
CJF ('%,)
557.;
111.9%
275.5
65.9%
416.5
90.1'%.
n/a
n/a
202
8S?%
458
925'50
320
712X.
343.5
75.8%
646
95.1%
526.5
76.6'%,
3755.5
86.7%
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
OTTAWA EAST
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01A)' Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Est. ADE
Year
465.5
PlanningCa
Current
2000 /2001
2001 /2002
2002/2003
OCDSB Schools
86.051(1
1'
111.2
Grade S
ADE
L'F (' %,)
Est.
OF (' %,)
Est. ADE
OF (' %,)
Built
pacih'
Program
AIDE
JK -6 ENG
Manor Pk
1950
0
653,5
SK -6 EFI
491.5
75.2%
465.5
71?S6 '
465.5
71.20/'o
JK -6 ALT
IK -8 ENG
Queen Elizabeth
7-8 EFI
1954
0
638.5
464.25
72.7"/„
532.5
83.4%
512
80.2%
4 -7 MR
Queen Mary
1956
1
345
JK -6 ENG
2S6
74. 21'.6
32.3
93.9'SS.
292
84.6'Xf
Robert E. Wilson 1
1955
0
256.5
JK -6 ENG
245.5
56.7 %,
24S
86.6'.,6
2=46.5
56,017,
JK -6 ENG
Rockclille Pk
1946
0
338
SK -6 EFI
361.5
107.0"/
378
111.8%
376
111.2 %,
Sub -Total
1
2261.5
1821.75
80.6%
1918
96.1%
1892
83.7%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01A)' Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
liF (Ix.)
465.5
71.2
512
80.2%
293
84.6%
246.5
86.051(1
376
111.2
1892
83.7 " /„
R1
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board G /C� ,
OTTAWA WEST
L4.
( I rtes:
ie Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (11) is based on 01/0? Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization lactor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
725
98.1'50
351
88.01%
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
172.5
Ycar
490.5
PlanningCa
582
68.9%
183
42.3%
OCDSB Schools
93.7°%
1,
84.5%
Grade &
ADE
OF ('N,)
Est. ADE
GF ( %)
Est.
OF ('N,)
Built
pacity
Program
ADE
JK -8 ENG
Broadview
1930
1
739
7 -8 LFI
653.75
85.51;0
716
96.9'16
725
95.1 °/u
5 -S G. ENG
Churchill
1991
0
399
JK -6 ALT
364.25
91.3%,
349.5
S7.6 "0
351
58.04;,
Connaught
1993
0
420.5
.1K -6 ENG
335.25
S0.4o ,
338.5
50.5':6
340.5
81.0%
JK -S ENG
D. Roy Kennedy
1954
1
558.5
4 -8 MFI
559.75
105.6 %,
5795
103.5%
589.5
105.6$'0
.IK ENG
Devonshire
1910
0
302
SK -6 EFl
169
56.01A
169.5
56.1%
172.5
57.1%
JK -6 ENG
Elmdalc
1928
6
420.5
SK -6 EF1
493.5
117.4 1N.
508
120.8%
490.5
116.6%
7 -8 ENG
Fisher Park /Summit
1949
0
844.5
7 -8 EFI
542
64.2%
514
60.9"x0
470
55.7%
7 -8 A LT
Hilson
1999
0
432.5
JK -6 ENG
179.75
41.60/,
178.5
41.39.
183
42.3%
JK ENG
Woodroffe
1949
0
455.5
SK -6 EFI
392
80.7%
415
85.5%
455
93.7%
Sub -Total
8
4602
3722.25
80.9%
3768.5
81.9% 1
3777
811'%
( I rtes:
ie Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (11) is based on 01/0? Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization lactor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
l F NO
725
98.1'50
351
88.01%
340.5
81.01%
589.5
105.6%
172.5
i7.1%
490.5
116.6%
582
68.9%
183
42.3%
455
93.7°%
3889
84.5%
lip
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
EAST URBAN COMMUNITY - CUMMBERLAND
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes rclocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number ofportables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (L)F) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
OCDSB Schools
Year
448
PlanningCa
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
188.5
Built
1'
pacity
Grade &
92.8%
Est.
Program
ADE
OF (' %,)
Est. ADE
LIF (' %,)
OF
ADE
.IK ENG
D. Foubert
1981
6
375.5
SK -6 EI I
487.5
129.8%
470
12)5.2%
448
119.3%
.IK -8 ENG
Fallingbrook
1985
1 1
521.5
SK -S EFI
550 25
105.5%
534
102.4%
512
98?' " "io
X -8 ENG
Maple Ridge
1998
0
644.5
SK -8 EFI
4S,
74.8'%,
561.5
87.1'So
625
97.094,
5 -6 G. ENG
1K -6 ENG
Queenswood
1969
0
359.5
SK -6 EFI
214
59.5%
208.5
58.0%
188.5
52.4°/,
.IK -S ENG
Trillium
1994
0
644.5
SK -8 EFI
546.75
84.8%
524.5
81.4"/
505.5
78.4 ru
7 -8 LFI
Sub -Total
7 1
2545.5
1
2280.50 1
89.6% 1
2198.5 1
90.3% 1
2279 1
89.57 .
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes rclocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number ofportables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (L)F) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
L F
448
119.3%
520
99.7%
625
97.0'%
188.5
52.4%
580.5
90.1 `50
2362 1
92.8%
9
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board
EAST URBAN COMMUNITY - GLOUCESTER
W
2002/2003
Est. ADE
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Year
409
Plannin-Ca
Current
2000 /2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
OCDSB Schools
87.8%
P
75.6
Grade S
Built
pacih
Program
ADE
OF ( %,)
Est. ADE
OF (' %,)
Est. ADE
OF
Convent Glen
1975
1
253
JK -5 ENG
237.25
93.8 ".„
233
92.1(1/.
234.5
92.70;6
JK -5 ENG
Forest Valley
1989
0
595
SK -5 EFI
458?5
77.0%
420.5
70.7%
409
68.7%
JK ENG
Henry Larsen
SK -8 EFI
1986
0
624.5
499.25
79.9%
484
77.5%
457.5
73.3%
7 -8 LFl
JK -6 ENG
Orleans Wood
1983
0
412.5
SK -6 EFI
289
70.1%
268
65.0%
262.5
63.6%
JK -8 ENG
Terry Fox
1981
3
510.5
SK -8 EFI
538.5
105.5%
478
93.6%
448
87.8%
7 -8 LFI
Sub -Total
4
2395.5
2022.25
84.4'%
1883.5
78.6%
1811.5
75.6%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatablc classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number ot'portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as lollows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendation
2002/2003
Est. ADE
L'F ( %.
0.0 °i6
409
68.Tx.
457.5
73.3%
262.5
63.6%
448
87.8%
1811.5
75.6
116-
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
RURAL NORTHEAST
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
Est. ADE
Year
244.5
96.8%
Current
2000 /2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
OCDSB Schools
I ,
Grade S
ADE
%
OF (' )
OF (' %,)
Est. ADE
OF CV.0
Built
pacify
Program
ADE
JK -6 ENG
Meadowview
1966
2
252.5
SK -6 EFI
260
103.0%
262
103.8%
248.5
98.4%
Riverview Cumb
1't53
0
229.1
IK -8 ENG
1 1 1.75
48.7 ° /
89
38.8 ",0
79
34.4`%.
Sub -Total
2
-152
371.71
77.1
351
72.3'%
327.5
b79%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
OF (' %.)
244.5
96.8%
Ili)
nil
244.5 1
96.3%
M
14-
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board
RURAL NORTHWEST
r
2002/2003
Est. ADE
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
257.5
War
68.5
Pla nil in-Ca
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
.2002/2003
OCDSB Schools
76.6'X)
1'
111.2%
Grade &
Built
pacity
Program
ADE
IT (' %)
Est. ADE
OF ('%,)
Est. ADE
IT ('%,)
JK -8 ENG
Fitzroy Centennial
1967
1
289.5
7 -8 LFI
320.5
110.7%
288.5
99.7%
257.5
88.9%
Fitzroy Harbour
1919
1
73.5
JK -6 ENG
72
98.0';0
73
99.3%
68.5
93.2%
JK -8 ENG
H. Centennial
1967
5
387.5
SK -8 EFI
456.5
117.8%
423
109.2%
412
106.3%
JK -8 ENG
1998
11
363.5
SK -8 EFI
484.75
133.4%
561
154.30/,
560
154.10/
Stonecrest
4 -6 MFI
Torbolton I
1963
1
171
JK -6 ENG I
163.75
95.80,/,,
155.5 1
90.91X6
131
76.6'6,
Sub -Total 1
19
1285
1
1497.5
116.5%
1501 1
116.8%
1429 1
111.21Y.
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatabic classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) IS based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (ESt.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Stonccrest ES capacity does not include 269 pupil places which will be added in September 2002.
//V/.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
OF
257.5
88.9%
68.5
93.2 "'6
412
106.3 ° /u
560
154.1%
131
76.6'X)
1429 1
111.2%
1/1.
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board
RURAL SOUTHEAST
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE-.
Impact of
Recommendations
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
1OCDSB
Year
513
PlanningCa
Current
2000 /2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
Schools
101.8'%
P
106?%
Grade &
Built
pacify
Program
ADE
OF (' %,)
Est. ADE
[IF (' %,)
Est. ADE
OF ( %)
JK ENG
Castor Valley
1986
1
486.5
SK- 8 EFI
501.75
103.1%
517
106.3%
512
105.2%
7 -8 LFI
Greelv
1972
5
171
JK -6 FN(-, I
286.25
167.4 " / 1
263.5
154.1% 1
327.5 1
133.0'%.
Metcalfe
1957
3
473
.1K -8 FNG
443.75
93.8 " /"
454.5
96.1"/0
473.5
99.9'%,
Os2oode
1953
2
253.5
JK -6 ENG
280.25
111.0%
273.5
108.3"/0
257
101.8 " /0
Sub -Total
II
1383
1511
109.3%
1508.5
109.1%
1469
106.1'%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE-.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
OF (' %.)
513
105.2%
133.(1':
g227.5
5
99.9',11,
101.8'%
106?%
9
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board // El -
RURAL SOUTHWEST
W
2002/2003
Est. ADE
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
504
Year
132.5
Plannin;Ca
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002 /2003
OCDSB Schools
127.9%
P
99.3%
Grade &
94.2%
1159
101.9%
Built
pacit ,
Program
AIDE
OF ( %)
Est. ADE
OF ( %)
Est. ADE
OF ( /o)
6 -8 ENG
Goulboum
1966
4
425.5
6 -8 EFI
452.5
106.3%
479
112.6%
504
118.4"/
7 -8 LFI
JK ENG
Kars
1945
0
228.5
SK -5 EFI
123.5
54.0%
126
55.1%
132.5
58.0%
JK -5 ENG
Manotick
1947
3
302
SK -5 EFI
328.25
108.7%
336.5
111.4%
353.5
117.1%
Munster
1977
0
229
JK -5 ENG
205.75
89.8%
199
86.9%
184.5
80.6%
North Gower
1969
4
277.5
1K -5 ENG
320
115.3' %,
349.5
125.911K,
355
127.9"/
Richmond
1924
1
207
JK -5 ENG
204.75
98.9%
216.5
104.6%
205.5
99.3%
6 -8 ENG
1975
0
450
6 -8 EFI
402.5
89.4%
427
94.9%
424
94.2%
Rideau Valley
7 -8 LFl
Sub -Total
11 1
1119.5 1
20372.5
96.1'% 1
2133.5
100.7% 1
1159 1
101.9%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01 /02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilisation factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
(W
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
CIF ('%
504
118.4%
132.5
58.0%
353.5
117.1%
184.5
80.650
355
127.9%
205.5
99.3%
424
94.2%
1159
101.9%
iff
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board
SOUTH URBAN COMMUNITY WEST - NEPEAN
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (EsLADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Adrienne Clarkson ES capacity is included as 742 based on current use of facility.
Impact of
Recommendations
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
OCDSB Schools
Year
P
PlanningCa
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002 /2003
650.5
Built
542.5
pacity
Grade &
91.5'%
Program
ADE
OF ('%)
Est. ADE
OF ( %,)
Est. ADE
OF (IX,)
JK -5 ENG
Barrhaven
1968
11
424
SK -5 EFI
541.75
127.8%
418
98.6%
381.5
90.0%
6 -8 ENG
Cedarview
6 -8 EFI
1994
5
756
7 -8 LFI
793.5
105.0%
789
104.4%
814
107.7%
7 -8 G. ENG
JK -5 ENG
Jockvale
1985
0
498
SK -5 EFI
411.75
82.7%
377
75.7%
369.5
74.2"4,
JK -6 ENG
Adrienne Clarkson
2002
0
742
SK -6 EFI
n/a
n/a
612.5
82.5%
650.5
87.71,%
JK -5 ENG
Mary Honeywell
1989
2
593.5
SK -5 EFI
631
106.3%
589
99.2%
542.5
91.4%
Sub -Total
18
3013.5
1
2378.00 1
78.9%
2785.5
92.4%
2758
91.591,
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (EsLADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Adrienne Clarkson ES capacity is included as 742 based on current use of facility.
Impact of
Recommendations
3002/2003
Est. ADE
OF (' %,)
381.5
90.01/1.
814
107.7%
369.5
74.2"
650.5
87.7';0
542.5
91.4 °u
2758
91.5'%
F
P]
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board /�o
STITTSVILLE
IV
2002/2003
Est. ADE
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
741
fear
459
PlanningCa
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
OCDSB Schools
P
Grade S
ADE
OF (' %.)
Est. ADE
tIF (' %.)
Est. ADE
OF
Built
pacify
Program
SK -8 ENG
A.L. Cassidy
1991
8
644
SK -8 EFI
791.5
122.9%
770.5
119.6%
741
115.1%
JK -5 ENG
Stittsville
1953
4
399.5
SK -5 EF1
456.5
114.3%
441
110.4%
459
114.9%
Sub -Total
12
1053.5
1248 1
119.6% 1
1211.5 1
116.1% 1
1200
115.0%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes rclocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01 /02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
t'F
741
1 15.1' %u
459
114.9%
1200
115.0%
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board
1 WEST URBAN COMMUNITY - KANATA NORTH
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendation
Historical. Actual and Status Quo Projections
Est. ADE
Year
493
PlanningCa
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/3003
OCDSB Schools
T49.6%
1'
Grade &
Built
pacify
Program
ADE
OF (%,)
Est. ADE
IIF (' %o)
Est. ADE
L F (' %,)
Roland Michener
1970
8
313.5
JK -6 ENG
1 521.5
166.306,
500
159.5%
393
157."'%
JK ENG
S. Leacock
1965
8
522.5
SK -8 EFI
� -
_>
6 5
119.7 n /
694.5
1329%
726
138.9%
7 -8 LFI
W.E. Johnston
1969 1
11 1
-173.5 1
JK -8 L-NG
717.5
151.5% 1
702.5 1
148.4'%
740.5
156.40%
Sub -Total
1
27 1
1309.5_1
1864.5
142.4% 1
1897
144.9%
1959.5
149.6'%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01/02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows ADE/Capacity.
The estimated average daily enrolment (Est.ADE) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendation
2002/2003
Est. ADE
OF ('G,
493
157.3" S,
726
135.9%
740.5
156A%
1959.5
T49.6%
r,
F1
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board /a4
WEST URBAN COMMUNITY - KANATA SOUTH
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01 /02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UP) is calculated as follows: ADC/Capacity.
ie estimated averatgc daily enrolment (Est.ADE-) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
Historical. Actual and Status Quo Projections
696.5
Ycar
465
PlanningCa
Current
2000/2001
2001/2002
2002/2003
OCDSB Schools
83.9%
Y
146.9%
Grade S
ADE
L'F (' %,)
Est. ADE
OF (°/,)
Est. ADE
11F (' %,)
Built
pacify
Program
JK -8 ENG
Bridlewood
1987
11
474
7 -8 G. ENG
609.25
128.5 °,S,
671.5
141.7%
696.5
146.9%
JK -6 ENG
Castlefrank
1988
3
483
SK -6 EFI
504.5
104.5%
485.5
100.5%
465
96.3%
Glen Cairn
1967
0
411.5
JK -6 ENG
353.75
86.0 °o
316.5
76.9%
280.5
68.2°/,
JK -6 ENG
John Young
1977
0
571
SK -6 EFI
5 -6 G. ENG
506.5
88.7 %,
506.5
88.7%
500
°
87.6/°
JK ENG
Katimavik
SK -8 EFI
1981
0
400
4 MFI
326.5
81.6%
342
85.5%
335.5
83.9%
7 -8 LFI
JK -8 ENG
W.O. Mitchell
1998
10
559
SK -8 EFl
694.5
124.2%
767
137.2%
821
146.9%
Sub -Total
1
24
2898.5
1
2995
103.3% 1
3089 1
106.6% 1
3098.5 1
106.9%
Notes:
The Planning capacity includes relocatable classroom modules (RCM's) and leased facilities.
The number of portables (P) is based on 01 /02 Final Portable Allocations.
The utilization factor (UP) is calculated as follows: ADC/Capacity.
ie estimated averatgc daily enrolment (Est.ADE-) assumes that March FTE is equal to October FTE.
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/2003
Est. ADE
U ('% )
696.5
146.940
465
500
87.6%
335.5
83.9%
821
146.9%
3098.5
(W"
Ic 0 --
OTTAWA CAM F'FON
APPENDIX B
Review Area Utilizations
Secondary
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
r r r
Ottawa Carleton District School Board
Secondary School Review Areas
Review Aran 1 MR hn R r�.,.f�...:.....r
Impact of
Recommendations
2002103
Est ADE I UF( %)
Bell
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
School/Site
Year
Built
Port's
Capacity
Current Grade &Program
2000/01
2001/02
2002103
ADE
1262.36
Est ADE
OF (%)
Est ADE
OF (% )
Review Aran 1 MR hn R r�.,.f�...:.....r
Impact of
Recommendations
2002103
Est ADE I UF( %)
Bell
1961
9
1092
9 -OAC ENG /IMM /EF; GIF; SP
1239.32
113.49%
1268.98
118.23%
.46
115.43%
1262.36
115.60%
Sir Robert Borden
1968
1
1104
9.OACENG /IMWEF;SP
1100.26
99.66%
1115.77
117.13%
.91
103.52%
1171.38
106.10%
WoodroNe
1960
0
912
9OAC ENG; 9IMMIEF; SP
664.70
72.88%
866.38
A73.07%681.29
246.40
74.70%
667.9)
75.47%
Sub -total
1987
10
3108
9.OAC ENGIIMM/EF
3004.28
96.66%
3050.73
92.21%
.66
99.25%
7121.67
100.44
Raviaw dran 7 /Wow• 11.1.-... n n
A.Y. Jackson
1976
11
759
V' 9.OAC ENG /IMMIEF
892.28
117.56%
897.38
118.23%
899.31
118.49 %
900.26
118.61
Earl of March
1970
10
969
9.OAC ENG /IMM /EF; SP
1081.44
111.60%
1135.00
117.13%
1127.41
116.35%
11282 6
116.45%
Frederick Bantin
1996
0
Na
ALTERNATE
220.00
Na
246.40
n/a
246.40
n/a
246.40
nla
West Carleton
1987
0
861
9.OAC ENGIIMM/EF
752000
87.34%
793.97
92.21%
785.40
91.22%
785.40
91.22%
Sub -total
21
2589
2945.72
113.78%
3072.75
118.68%
3058.52
118.14%
3060.42
118.21%
Review
Review Area 5 Leitrim South Urban Centre East & Rural South East
Os oode 1954 5 651 9.OACENGIIMMIEF 1 700.69 107.63% 1 697.08 107.08% 706.50 108.53%
Sub -total 5 651 700.69 1 107.63 % 1 697.08 1 107.08% 706.50 1 108.53
Review Area G /Fact llrhan ca.,t. ,v C.._1 111....1. �__•.
1200.19 1 89.30%
1200.19 1 89.30%
1078.03 133.58
1078.03 133.5811
707.45 108.67
707.45 108.67
CairineWilson
1975
0
831
^v 9.OACENGIIMMIEF;SP
653.62
78.65%
721.15
86.78%
1 752.14
90.51 %
752.14
90.51%
Sir Wilfrid Laurier
1991
3
1188
9.OAC ENG /IMM /EF
1238.09
104.22%
1211.90
102.01%
1194.76
100.57 %
1194.76
100.57%
Sub -total
1957
3
2019
9.OAC ENG; 9.10 IMMIEF; SP
1891.71
97.70%
1933.05
95.74%
1946.90
96.43%
1946.90
96.43%
Raviaw Aran 7 M-- u:u D n•. _..._ c
Colonel By
1971
4
930
9- OACENG /IMMIEF /IB
1070.06
115.06 %
1 1056.83
113.64 %
1 1010.16
1 108.62%
1010.16
108.62%
Gloucester
1963
0
1608
9.0AC ENG /IMMIEF; GIF; SP
1430.75
1 88.98%
1 1416.01
88.06%
1447.94
I 90.05%
1447.94
90.05%
Rideau
1957
0
966
9.OAC ENG; 9.10 IMMIEF; SP
660.47
68.37 %
654.00
67.70%
656.92
68.00%
656.92
68.00
Sub -total
4
3504
3161.28
1 90.22%
1 3126.84
89.24 %
1 3115.02
88-90%
3115.02
88.90
Ottawa Carleton District School Board
Secondary School Review Areas
Historical, Actual and Status Quo Projections
]Year 2000/01 2001/02 2002103
Port's LJ Current Grade 8 Program ADE OF �ADE ) I Est ADEOF
Review Aron o in......._ u.__. o
Impact of
Recommendations
2002/03
Est ADE I UF( %)
92.09%
1951
94.30%
1370.94
ALTERNATE
1370.94
96.82%
131.40%
A2573.65
126.93%
974.40
gO4
974.40
120.74%
61.73%
0
66.07%
214.07
623.41
214.07
66.07%
100-68%
1362
101.05%
2559.41
Ne can
2559.41
100.49
Elizabeth W nwood
1951
` o•o,c
366
ALTERNATE
76.54%
270.00
J.S. Woodsworth
1973
0
747
9 -0AC ENG /IMMIEF; SP
708.81
Laurentian
1958
0
1143
9 -0AC ENG; 91MMIEF; SP
623.41
Merivale
1963
0
1362
9 -OAC ENGIIMMIEF; GIF
1223.93
Ne can
1922
2
849
9.OAC ENGIIMM/EF
1194.32
Sub -total
1148.62
2
4467
1
4020.47
rcevlew Area 10 Alta Vista 6 Hunt Club
Brookfield 1962 1 1107 f
Canterbu 1969 4 1134 9.OAC
Hillcresl 1961 0 1164
n
1958
AL
SP 1159.01
1157.9,
174.00
648.13
104.63%
73.77%
280.14
76.54%
280.14
76.54%
280.14
76.54
94.89%
727.88
97.44%
712.27
95.35%
0.00
0.00%
54.54 %
630.71
55.18%
611.12
53.47%
1096.10
95.90%
89.86%
1288.96
94.64%
1351.40
99.22%
1407.11
103.31%
140.67%
1179.14
138.89%
1148.62
135.29%
1148.62
135.29%
90.00 /
4106.83
91.94 %
4103.55
91.86% 1
1 3931.97
105.70%
104.63%
1205.90
108.93%
1178.40
106.45%
1195.00
107.95%
102.21%
1191.65
105.08%
1245.51
109.83%
1247.41
110.00%
99.48%
1144.75
98.35%
1155.20
99.24%
1157.10
99.41%
92.06%
207.34
109.70%
207.34
109.70%
207.34
109.70%
66.89%
707.73
73.04%
762.60
78.70%
860.63
88.62%
102.29%
94.18%
4457.37
97.69 %
4549.05
99.69 %
4667.48
r,,...,. - n acn001
Ottawa Technical L.C.
1967
0
1176
10 -OAC ENG /ADULT
1070.72
91.05%
1013.65
86.19%
1013.65
86.19%
1013.65
86.19%
Sir Guy Carleton
1971
0
1056
9.12 ADAPTIVE; SP
316.31
29.95%
443.61
42.01%
418.50
418.50
39.63%
Sub -total
1981
0
783
9.12 ADAPTIVE; SP
457.20
58.39%
424.43
54.21%
399.08
E39.631%
50.97%
399.08
50.97%
0
3015
1844.23
61.17 %
1881.69
62.41 %
1831.23
60.74 %
1831.23
60.74
secondary Total 65 28614
26730.16
93.42% 1 27212.30 95.10% 27219.77 95.13%
27219.77 97.68%
Notes:
1. The estimated ADE's are calculated based on ADE /headcount factors for the 2000/01 school year.
2. There is no capacity shown for Frederick Banting, since this is a leased site.
3. The number of portables is based on 2001/02 final portable allocations.
4. The utilization factor (UF) is calculated as follows: ADE /Capacity.
5. The 2002/03 status quo ADE projections are based on staffing projections as of March 7, 2002.
6. The secondary school review areas represent preliminary review areas for the
purposes of the Long
aggregating City of Ottawa sub - areas.
Term Accommodation Plan (LTAP). These review
areas were developed by
kool 44W L
[1--j-
21-iAWA-CARLFTL)N
tiIIIIT 1i IIi I[I( M1i lAIl11
APPENDIX C
Financial Impact
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
M
Elementary Schools
J.H. Putman
L.D. Billings
Lakeview
Riverview (Cumberland)
Secondal,v Schools
J.S. woodsworth
Annualized S
t
The Ottaiva- Carleton District School Board
L1
Recommended School Closures for 2002/2003
Financial Impact
Savings
Custodial Operations (1)
Average Costs for
Principal/All? (2)
$154,000
S89,000
$130,000
S89,000
$75,000
S89,000
$1 1 1,000
$59,000
S3S7
000 1 S619
Notes:
I. Includes utilities, custodial, and grounds expenses, but not maintenance.
2. Based on average salaries per Budget.
3. Represents savings net of increases at receiving schools.
4. Represents the net reduction in top -up funds as a result of closures and redirections.
Decreased Revenue
Average Costs for Small Schools Reduced
Office Staff and Technicians (3) Grant Top-Up" Funds (4) Net Balance
532,575 ( 77,463) 2
1 5115,11_
SG7,1_5 (25,480) S260,645
S51,550 (S7,30S) $131,242
S70,525 (54,0()0) (86,890) $129,635
I86,482 I 1 (152945) 1 $683,537
($54,000) 1 (S430,086) I 51,403,171
less One -lime costs for 2002103•
ongoing utilities, mothballing costs etc ($215,000)
moving costs, misc, renovations etc ($175,000)
Total Fiscal Savings, 2002/03: $1,013,171
(W- (w, (W
C,
[1z]
OTTAWA-CAFIFTON
T "CT lIZHCKA NOARD
APPENDIX D
Population Information
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
14Q P.
The Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
// EIementary Utilization and School -age Population by Sub -area
Alta Vista
Elementary Status (Oct 31, 2001 j
Sub -areas
Planning
Capacity **
I Est'd
ADE*
PP (+ / -)
FUF ' %
Alta Vista
5,630.5
5,153.0
477.5
91.5%
Bayshore
1,755.5
1,358.5
397.0
77.4%
Beacon Hill
2,208.0
1,649.0
559.0
74.7%
Cedarview
3,932.0
3,5135
418.5
89.4%
Central and Inner
3,897.5
3,307.6
589.9
84.9%
Hunt Club
4,215.5
3,747.5
468.0
88.9%
Ivlerivale
4,692.0
3,769.0
923.0
80.3%
Ottawa East
2,261.5
1,948.0
313.5
86.1%
Ottawa West
4,602.0
3,768.5
833.5
81.9%
Inside the Greenbelt:
33,194.5
28,214.6
4,979.9
85.0'%,
EUC East (Cumberland)
2,545.5
2,298.5
247.0
90.3%
EUC West (Gloucester)
2,395.5
1,883.5
512.0
78.6%
Leitrim
0
0
0
0.0%
Rural Northeast
482.0
351.0
131.0
72.8%
Rural Northwest
1,285.0
1,501.0
-216.0
116.8%
Rural Southeast
1,383.0
1,508.5
-125.5
109.1%
Rural Southwest
2,119.5
2,133.5
-14.0
100.7%
SUC East
0
0
0
0.0%
SUC West
3,013.5
2,785.5
228.0
92.4%
Stittsville
1,043.5
1,211.5
-168.0
116.1%
West Urban Community North
11309.5
1,897.0
-587.5
144.9%
West Urban Community South
2,898.5
3,089.0
-190.5
706.6%
Outside the Greenbelt:
18,475.5
18,659.0
-183.5
101.0'%,
Clifford Bowey and Crystal Bay
315.0
183.5
131.5
55.3 °6
Elementary System Totals:
51,985.0
47,057.1
4,927.9
J
School -age Population 2001 to 2011 ( °o Chrrrlgc)
0-4 5 -9 10-14 15 -19 (5 -14)
-4.9%
-8.9%
- 2.3`.' /0
17.5%
-5.7%
0.0%
-13.0%
-4.5%
14.3%
-8.9 016
31.3%
11.1%
11.8%
10.5%
11.40"D
0.0%
-12.9%
-18.2%
3.3%
-15.6%
-1.5%
3.3%
17.9`,6
%
-2.6%
-24.5%
-17.3%
8%
-5.1%
-4.8%
2.6%
n'o-1.8%
°'0
-7.4%
-10.0%
7.7%
0.0%
-70.0%
-5.0%
%
- 1.01%,
-94%
-2.9 %,
16.9'%,
-62%
34.7%
1.6%
-9.6%
3.9%
-4.4%
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
20.0%
-7.1%
- 25.0%
0.0%
-] 7.6%
16.7%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
16.7%
-6.3%
0.0%
26.7%
-3.0%
23.1%
0.0%
0.0%
17.6%
0.0%
385.7%
528.6%
557.1%
600.0%
542.9%
103.4%
72.2%
80.0%
112.99X71
76.1%
80.0%
30.8%
28.6%
66.7%
29.6%
95.0 °6
63.3%
70.8%
91.1%
67.0%
69.2'%,
39.0'%,
34.8'%,
53.9%,
36.8'%,
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
26.8'%,
11.8'%, 1
14.5'%,
33.8'%,
13.2%
1. School -age Population Projection figures (' %, change) are derived from numbers provided by the City of Ottawa
in October 2001. City council has approved the projection as the basis for the city's new Official PIan.
2. For a summary of Secondary school utilizations by sub -area, please see Appendix B.
3. Leitrim sub -area contains no population for 2001- projections are for 550 0-4, 650 5 -9, 60010 -14, and 50015 -19 by 2011
*Enrohrrcnt Figures are based on October 31, 2001 ern•olrrlents and are taken %iron: Report #02 -016 (January 28, 2002).
** Planning Grpacity at the elcnccntan/ parcel includes capacity associated roitlr Rclouttable Classroom Modules (RCMs) and
leased fircilities (EliZabetlt Park).
9
7J,j-
0 fIAWA-cA RIJ TL)N
I')II -CT 101-1 MI I�NI�
APPENDIX E
Community Use of Schools
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
/130
161. OTTAWA - CARLETON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
COMMUNITY USE OF SCHOOLS
SELECTED SCHOOLS - BREAKDOWN OF COMMUNITY USE BY SCHOOL / PERMIT HOLDER
IE
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
Z.,
Z
SCHOOL
ACTIVITY
p
f=
TOTAL
CATEGORY
HOURS
z :
0:
.z
0
1
J.H. Putman
School Activities
X
179.00
School
Meetings
X
126.00
Youth
Meetings
X
28.00
School Council
Meetings
X
2.50
School Council
Music Day
X
30.00
School
Meetin s
X
58.00
Youth
Sub -Total
423.50
2
J.S. Woodsworth
Floor Hockey
Youth
Basketball
X
8.00
Youth
Basketball
X
104.50
Youth
Soccer
X
56.00
Youth
Soccer
X
18.00
Youth
Volleyball
X
44.00
Youth
Exercises
X
25.00
Youth
Meetings g
X
48.00
School Council
Grade 9 Orientation
X
13.00
School
School Activities
X
81.00
School
School Activities
X
204.00
School
School Activities
X
6.00
School
School Activities
X
5.00
School
School Activities
X
2.00
School
School Activities
X
4.00
School
School Activities
X
24.00
School
School Activities
X
42.00
School-
Volleyball
. _
X
62.00
Private
Volleyball
X
60.00
Private
Basketball
X
34.00
Private
Meetings
X
16.00
Private
Driving Lessons
X
49.00
Private
Woodcarving
X
27.00
Community
adminton
X
90.00
Community
Music Practices
X
20.00
Community
Music Practices
X
24.00 Community
Music Practices
X
24.00 Community
Meetings
X
6.00 Board
- Staff Dev
Classes
X
3.24.00 Board
• Cont Ed
Meetin
s
X
9.00 Board
• Cont Ed
Sub
Total
1457.50
IE
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
Lq
3
Lamira Dow Billings
Basketball
X
141.50
Youth
Noon Hour Program
X
13.60
Youth
Meetings
X
25.00
School Council
School Activities
X
26.00
School
School Activities
X
2.50
School
Exercise Classes
X
124.00
Private
After School
X
511.501
Municipal
Sub Total
844.10
4
Lakeview
School Activities
X
7.00
School
School Activities
X
24.50
School
School Activities
X
7.00
School
School Activities
X
27.00
School
Music Lessons
X
38.00
Private
Open House
X
5.00
Municipal
Adult Tai Chi
X
42.00
Municipal
Private
I
X
114.00
Community
Sub -Total 1
264.50
5
Riverview Cumberland
Meetings
X
20.00
School Council
School Activities
X
6.00
School
Before and After School
X
128.00
Municipal
Open House
X
5.50
Municipal
Exercise Classes
X
61.00
Communit
Sub-Total
220.50
TOTAL
3,831.60
Facilities and Physical Planning
26 March 2002
/ -0� a
ctj-
r1AWA- F1 ON
in<n:ic* s<�uvn x<�.xo
APPENDIX F
Current Attendance Boundary Maps
For Closed/Receiving Schools
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
13
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
Eiementary Schooi Attendance Boundaries
Bell's Corners P.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 5 ENG
Edulog # 127
Prepared by Physical Panninc and Transportation vj
77 May 2001
Qft?wa_('artafnn flicfrirt qr -hnnI Rnarri
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries 195 ,
Fallingbrook Community E.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 8 ENG
Kindergarten to Grade 8 EFI
,, Edulog #1600
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transporiaiion 78 May 2001
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
OO''W Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
Fisher Park P.S.
Grade 7 to 8 EFI
Edulog # 929
Prepared by Physical Planning and TransportaJon May 2001
fl4t�w�_(_ ?rinfnn (lictrir4 Crhnnl Rnarrl /� �f
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries /
J.H. Putman P.S.
Grade 7 to 8 ENG
Option Area - Option to attend either J.H. Putman PS or Pinecrest PS for Grades 7 -8 =VG
Edu(og 4 998, 1001
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation May 2001
80
Ottawa- Carleton District Sr:hnnl Rnarri
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
J.H. Putman P.S.
Grade 7 to 8 EFI
d
E
0
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation Edulog # 999
81 May 2001
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board /
ic.i icii�tat y' 6c ool rkiie,nciance ouundaries
Lakeview P.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 5 EFI
by Physical Planning ana i ransporaiion
EFA
Edulog # 142
May 2001
Ottawa - Carieton District School Board
t-ie mentary 501"1001 AL!endance Boundaries
Lamira Dow Billings E.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 5 EFI
i
Henry M
Robert Hopkins Ps 0
,�Colonel�
\ByS��
Le Phare ES •,,,
Montreal Roa d�
1.91:'x°' \ LW
Lamira Dow Billings ES
„ - -
Gloucester HS
n.�
\�1r 0
11" oc
Q-°aa B.
Q- df `cam
cyrvme R ao
9
9
Prepared by Physical Planning and Trarsporafion Edulog # 50 ,,
83 May 2001
Ottawa - Carleton District School Board
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
Le Phare E.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 5 EFI
by Physical Planning and Transportation
84
Henry Munro MS
i 0
Lamira Dow Billings ES
Edulog # 52
May 2001
Ottawa- Carieton District School Board
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
)q�-
Le Phare E.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 5 EFI
Edulog # 53
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation May 2001
T lv)
85
• i— iff.2S,!t2-r-nrintnn
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
Maple Ridge E.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 8 ENG /EFI
7
N
G
cc
O
N
�R
`z
Maple Ridge ES q\
`�n�oad
�f
s
<.
m
O
d
O-
a
0]
0
d
0
r-
0
IL
0
ad
-�V,
d
ego
o�
1 0-
�w Edulog #1604
Prepared by Pnysicai Planning and Transportation 86 Mlay 2001
1�4Elementary School Aiiendance Boundaries
Maple Ridge E.S.
Grade 7 to 8 ENG
Pr=-P2.--=t by Physical Planning and Transporation 87 Edulog # 1605
May 2001
' r.•.+.."=- .u.,�. -L .i m:: A l.i JLlIUUI Daara
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
Mapl
Maple Ridge E.S.
Grade 7 to 8 EF1
Ottawa River
ril
L Edulog # 1606
Prepared by Physical Piannina and Transportation 88 tvJay 2001
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board
L Ie111C111C11 y burioU1 Hllendance Boundaries '
H6. Meadomiew P.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 6 ENG
CC7UI0g # 1008 Ij
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation May 2001
89
Mapi
A
viia`vrc- %diIVLO +t ulsirlci School board
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
Meadomiew P.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 6 EFI
Ottawa River
Edulog u 1609
Prepared by Physical Piannino and i ranspora,,ion 90 l\/lay 2001
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
Pinecrest P.S.
Grade 7 to 8 ENG
? �e
Qo
0 0
tk
�? Pinecrest PS
o
.o O
�c`o o� FL °aa
e
a
ay
Option Area - Option to attend either J.N. Putman PS or Pinecrest PS for Grades 7 -8 ENG
Prepared Edufog # 1001, 1060 vi
ep ed by Physical Panning and Transportation
9 May 2001
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board
ciementary School Attendance Boundaries /
Trillium E.S.
Kinderciarten to Grade 8 ENG /EFI
Cdulog 11602
Prepared by Physic--al Planning and Transportation
May 2601
92
16
X
Ottawa- Carieton District School Board
Eieiilentary School Attendance Boundaries
Trillium E.S.
Grade 7 to 8 LFI
Of'awa River
Edulog
7-ieP3ret D) P I)Slcal P;aflininc and I Ens ,poiiailon
93 102)' 2001
Ljrrawa- uarleton u►strnct School board
+, � �ir�mrVniary ji•ilrr�ii uli�rlr��l,i,u �,�+;,-+rs+�.�c
Riverview P.S. (Cumberland)
Kindergarten to Grade 8 ENG
Ottawa River
2pai °C P)' fl j'-s!'--ai P.ammrz and I "c ^SAO: �2IlOf1
94
;::dulog r 10 +7
vuawa- t,arIL -Lun w str!m zScho i Board ,
Elementary School Attendance Boundaries
�6a
Robert Hopkins P.S.
Kindergarten to Grade 5 ENG
Edulog X60 `
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation 95 May #6
<< Gtiawa- %arieion uistrici Scnnni nn ?rri
Secondary School Attendance Boundaries �✓
J.S. Woodsworth S.S.
Grade 9 to OAC English /Immersion /Extended French
W.
l
14.. 1 -1
1,
Edufog #1628
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transporaiion 96 May 2001
i C �Y
CD
t
Ottawa- Carleton District School Board
Secondary School Hifendance Boundaries
Laurentian H.S.
Grade 9 to OAC English
Grade 9 Immersion /Extended French (200112002)*
1
d �
A e
A
Laurentian HS
0
a
0
t9
:Aye
w `r
f0
n
L
A
1G
,,ec`i
goad
e
/
i'�r G
L �
9
�r
OPTIONAL AREA
\\Laurentian K.S.
or
Brookfield H.S.
LaUrentian H.S. immersion /Extended French Program phase -in beginning with grade 9 students
in September 2001.
Edulog #rl 010, 1043
Prepared by Physical Pianninc and I ranscor ailon pv;ay 200 i — vj
97
vuawa- vaI MwI I vioui.,L v.wv ..,.,.....
Secondary School Attendance Boundaries
Merivate H.S.
Grade 9 to OAC English /immersion /Extended French
Iff Merivale HS
Edulog #1626
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation May 2001
98
156
J
�IiL�W �i -1 .Atlt}'I [l11 District, il..a vl...vv. Board
Secondary School Attendance Boundaries
Merivale H.S.
Grade 9 to OAC English /Immersion /Extended French
0 a
Edulog #160
Prepared by Physical Pianrnng and Transportation May 2001
99
vudVVd- :di It: ivii viii ILA 01-i IUUI uvai u
Secondary School Attendance Boundaries /
Merivale N.S.
Grade 9 to OAC English /Immersion /Extended French
Edulog ;159
w
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transpo,, iation May 2001
100
I�^ l I lM��l.lf l "A��Ar/1.t �lir•�iivi vvii�vvi vv�: :rl �
Secondary School Attendance Boundaries
Merivale H.S. /South Carleton H.S. Optional Area
Grade 9 to OAC English /Immersion /Extended French
Edulog #162
Prepared by Physical Planning and Transportation May 2001
101
� (� '� =-=- ••- �= - 7•. -:.%t V1 DUd1U !!!
Secondary School Attendance Boundaries
Ridgemont H.S.
(W Grade 9 to OAC English
Grade 9 Immersion /Extended French (2002/03)*
ae
9
m
cr I
m
I Pleasant Park Road
���--�� r-
71� __
Kilbom Avenue-
=m r�7H Featherston Urive
m
—O
�m ad �Ld
dgemont HS
30 r�S�oa
R °aa
_c
=c r
'f 0 Cosa
� � a
N�
m�
dgemont H.S. Immersion /Extended French Program phase -in beginning with grade 9 students in
- ptember 2002
Eduiog #1106
'n;;iCal P ;anrinc and - ran;�c,-,at;on
Jaruanv 2002
MON,
[1-�-
OnAWA-CARI FTON
I�ItTNiii
APPENDIX G
Timelines
Cw
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002
/60.
l
iri2nAH'A-CARLETON
111;ic* 1111,0ni c�uri�
Timelines for
School Closure Process
(effective September 2002)
Activity
Date
Ide7Committeeof of Need for Study
oval of Timelines
25 February 2002
Thaking
% of the Whole Meeting - Presentation of staff's
26 March 2002
tions
of the Whole Meeting - Delegations from the schools
11 , 16 and 18 April 2002
recommended for closure and the schools impacted by the closed
schools
Committee of the Whole Meeting - Staff to receive questions from
7 and 9 May 2002
Trustees
Special Board Meeting - Final School Closure Decisions
14 May 2002
The Communication and Implementation
Communication of the Recommendation
May - September 2002
Implementation of Recommendation
September 2002
Facilities and Physical Planning 26 March 2002