The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About14 Report 00-261 Recommendations for Program and Student Relocations Arising out of the Closure of LD Billings ES, Devonshire PS, Merivale PS, and Mutchmor PSSupplementary Board Agenda 28 November 2000 (Tuesday) 8:00 p.m. (Public) FOLIO Program & Student Relocations: East Family, Near West /Central Families & South West Family (Reference Item 14 on Board Agenda) OTTAWA- CARLETON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 28 November 2000 Report No. 00 -261 to Board Re: Recommendations for Program and Student Relocations Arising out of the Closure of LD Billings ES, Devonshire PS, Merivale PS and Mutchmor PS ORIGINATORS: Rose -Marie Batley, Superintendent of Facilities and Physical Planning Michael Carson, Manager, Facilities, Planning and Transportation Planning Staff PURPOSE: To provide Trustees with program and student relocations for Lamira Dow Billings ES, Devonshire PS, Merivale PS, and Mutchmor PS as per Board approved motions of 25 October 2000. BACKGROUND: 2. The following motions were approved by the Board on 25 October 2000: "Close Lamira Dow Billings ES, effective September 2001 and direct staff to bring back recommendations for program and student relocations to the next Board meeting." "Close Devonshire School, effective September 2001 and direct staff to bring recommendations for program and student relocations to the next Board meeting." "Close Merivale PS, effective upon the opening of the new elementary school in Longfields /Davidson Heights, and direct staff to bring recommendations for program and student relocations to the Board meeting on 28 November 2000." "That Mutchmor Public School be closed, effective September 2001 and staff be directed to bring recommendations for program and student relocations to the 28 November 2000 Board meeting." STATUS: 3. In accordance with the above Board approved motions, staff prepared program and student relocation options to be presented to communities affected by the closures of Lamira Dow Billings ES, Devonshire PS, Merivale PS, and Mutchmor PS. 4. These program and student relocation options were presented to Principals and School Council representatives from the families of schools affected by the closures at meetings held on November 15 and 16. Copies of these options were provided to Trustees as part of the 17 November Memorandum backup. 0— 5. On November 15, a meeting was held at Merivale HS to present four relocation options for students affected by the closure of Merivale PS. Sixteen people attended the meeting, with the following schools represented: Agincourt; Carleton Heights; Century; McGregor Easson; Meadowlands; Merivale; Parkwood Hills; Sir Winston Churchill; and Manordale. 6. On November 15, a meeting was held at Colonel By SS to present three relocation options for students affected by the closure of Lamira Dow Billings ES. Eighteen people attended the meeting, with the following schools represented: Carson Grove; Henry Munro; Lamira Dow Billings; LePhare; and Robert Hopkins. 7. On November 16, a meeting was held at the Adult HS to present three relocation options for students affected by the closure of Devonshire PS and three relocation options for students affected by the closure of Mutchmor PS. Forty -seven people attended the meeting, with the following schools represented: Agincourt; Centennial; Connaught; Devonshire; Elgin; Elmdale; First Avenue; Fisher Park; Glashan; Hilson; Hopewell; Lady Evelyn; Mutchmor; Overbrook; and W.E. Gowling. In addition, a representative from the Special Education Advisory Committee (SEAC) attended the meeting. 8. Over the course of the past month, and in conjunction with the meetings held on November 15 and 16, staff has received feedback from a variety of individuals and school councils respecting program and student relocation options for the affected families of schools. Attached is a separate package which contains correspondence and feedback received through November 22, 2000. (for Trustees' distribution only) 9. In providing recommendations for program and student relocation, staff has reviewed the recommendations contained in the August 28, 2000 report, provided additional options for community consideration, consulted with and received input from the principals and school council representatives from the families of schools affected by the closures, and examined any viable options which have been brought forward by the aforementioned groups. 10. The attached package contains support information for each recommendation including enrolment impacts and utilizations and an attendance boundary map detailing the recommended relocation. The package also includes a listing of other options presented and considered for each school relocation and an overview of the correspondence and feedback received by staff. 11. Trustees approved student relocation recommendations with regard to the closure of Overbrook PS. Staff has received a significant amount of correspondence with respect to the relocation of the MFI program students. To address concerns raised by the community, staff held a meeting on 22 November at the Board office to receive input on the relocation of MFI program students affected by the closure of Overbrook. Approximately sixteen people attended the meeting, with the following schools represented: Elgin; First Avenue; Hopewell; Lady Evelyn; Overbrook; Queen Elizabeth; and Queen Mary. Correspondence received related to the location of the MFI program is included in the feedback package. RECOMMENDATIONS: A. That the following program and student relocations associated with the closure of Lamira Dow Billings ES be effective September 2001: i) Redirect JK ENG, SK -5 EFI program students from L.D. Billings' attendance area to Robert Hopkins. ii) Redirect Pineview SK -5 EFI program students from L.D. Billings' attendance area to LePhare. B. That the following program and student relocations associated with the closure of Devonshire PS be effective September 2001: i) Redirect Devonshire K -6 EFI program students residing west of the CPR tracks to W. E. Gowling. ii) Redirect Devonshire K -6 EFI program students residing east of the CPR tracks to First Avenue, within the Central family of schools. iii) Redirect Devonshire JK ENG program students to the JK -6 ENG program school for their area, based on the JK -6 ENG program boundaries. iv) Repatriate "out of boundary" Devonshire students to their home schools/ families. V) Redirect K -6 EFI program students from that portion of the Agincourt K -6 EFI area located within the Near West family to W. E. Gowling on a phased basis, beginning with SK students and students new to this area in September 2001. C. That the following program and student relocations associated with the closure of Merivale PS be effective September 2001: i) Redirect Merivale's student body residing north of Fallowfield Road to Meadowlands for JK -6 ENG and to Parkwood Hills for SK -6 EFI. ii) Redirect the Centrepointe East community to Manordale for SK -6 EFI. iii) That a one -time option to Parkwood Hills PS be provided to grades 4, 5 and 6 EFI program pupils residing in the Centrepointe East community. iv) Redirect JK program at Parkwood Hills to Century. D. That the following program and student relocations associated with the closure of Mutchmor PS be effective September 2001: i) Redirect Mutchmor JK -6 ENG students (less area west of Bronson and less area bounded by the Queensway to the north, the Rideau Canal to the east and Bank St. to the west) to Hopewell. ii) Redirect Mutchmor JK -6 ENG students residing in area bounded by the Queensway to the north, the Rideau Canal to the east and Bank St. to the west) to Elgin. iii) Redirect Mutchmor JK -6 ENG students west of Bronson to Cambridge. iv) Redirect Mutchmor Congregated Gifted ENG to Elgin. V) Redirect Elgin Street SK -6 EFI program students to First Avenue. vi) Redirect Hopewell Congregated Gifted EFI to Glashan. vii) Redirect First Avenue Congregated Gifted EFI students to Hopewell. &&Z James P. Grieve Rose - Marie Batley Director of Education /Secretary of the Board Superintendent of Facilities and Physical Planning gpcommendations td 17 F. OTITI * % 01 a re r1wo :ra rr.p..l ire I LTL,-1 OTTAWA-CARLETON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Area Review /School Closure Study — Recommendations for Program and Student Relocations (Inside Greenbelt) Summary of Program and Student Relocation Recommendations A. Lamira Dow Billings School Closure Program and Student Relocation Recommendations: Recommendation effective for September 2001 a) Redirect JK ENG, SK -5 EFI program students from L.D. Billings' attendance area to Robert Hopkins. b) Redirect Pineview SK -5 EFI program students from L.D. Billings' attendance area to LePhare. B. Devonshire School Closure Program and Student Relocation Recommendations: Redirection of Devonshire Students (effective September 2001) a) Redirect Devonshire K -6 EFI program students residing west of the CPR tracks to W. E. Gowling School. b) Redirect Devonshire K -6 EFI program students residing east of the CPR tracks to First Avenue School, within the Central family of schools. C) Redirect Devonshire JK ENG program students to the JK -6 ENG program school for their area, based on the JK -6 ENG program boundaries. d) Repatriate "out of boundary" Devonshire students to their home schools /families. Related Boundary Adjustment e) Redirect K -6 EFI program students from that portion of the Agincourt K -6 EFI area located within the Near West family to W. E. Gowling School on a phased basis, beginning with SK students and students new to this area in September 2001. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 (W C. Merivale School Closure Program and Student Relocation Recommendations: Recommendation effective for September 2001 a) Redirect Merivale's student body residing north of Fallowfield road to Meadowlands for JK -6 ENG and to Parkwood Hills for SK -6 EFI b) Redirect the Centrepointe East community to Manordale for SK -6 EFI. C) That a one time option to Parkwood Hills P.S. be provided to grades 4,5 and 6 EFI program pupils in the Centrepointe East Community. d) Redirect JK program at Parkwood Hills to Century P.S. D. Mutchmor School Closure Program and Student Relocation Recommendations: Recommendation effective for September 2001 a) Redirect Mutchmor JK -6 ENG students (less area west of Bronson and less area bounded by the Queensway to the north, the Rideau Canal to the east and Bank St. to the west) to Hopewell. b) Redirect Mutchmor JK -6 ENG students residing in area bounded by the Queensway to the north, the Rideau Canal to the east and Bank St. to the west) to Elgin. C) Redirect Mutchmor JK -6 ENG students west of Bronson to Cambridge. (or d) Redirect Mutchmor Congregated Gifted ENG to Elgin. e) Redirect Elgin Street SK -6 EFI program students to First Avenue. f) Redirect Hopewell Congregated Gifted EFI to Glashan. g) Redirect First Avenue Congregated Gifted EFI students to Hopewell. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 II LLT",-j OTTAWA-CARLETON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Area Review /School Closure Study — Recommendations for Program and Student Relocations (Inside Greenbelt) A. East Family Lamira Dow Billings School Closure Program and Student Relocation Recommendations 1. Recommendations: a) Redirect JK ENG, SK -5 EFI program students from L.D. Billings' attendance area to Robert Hopkins. b) Redirect Pineview SK -5 EFI program students from L.D. Billings' attendance area to LePhare. 2. Rationale for Recommendations The East family of schools currently has a surplus of approximately 950 pupil places. Although from a family perspective there is a large amount of space, the amount of space available at each school varies. In some cases, the amount of space is small and limits the potential for the redirection of students in "full block" moves. The amount of surplus space at the four schools in the Beacon Hill area is approximately 550 pupil places. However, almost 200 of the 550 surplus pupil places are located at Henry Munro which serves as the middle school for 3 elementary schools in the Beacon Hill area and one elementary school in the Carson Grove area. With the closure of Lamira Dow Billings, approximately 270 ADE students will need to be accommodated at schools in the Beacon Hill area. Staff anticipate that approximately 130 pupil places will be available at Le Phare and approximately 220 pupil places will be available at Robert Hopkins for the 2001/02 school year. The redirection of students from L.D. Billings, as a "block move ", to Le Phare would result in a utilization factor of approximately 140 %. The redirection of students from L.D. Billings, as a "block move ", to Robert Hopkins would result in a utilization factor of approximately 110 %. In both cases, portables would be required in order to accommodate the student population under a "block move ". Input received from the community indicated that placing portables on site at a school as a result of the closure of another school was not acceptable. Although staff recognizes that it is more desirable to redirect students in a "block move" in order to minimize disruption, this would not be possible when considering the redirection of students from L.D. Billings. Given this constraint, staff examined potential areas within the L.D. Billings' attendance area that could be redirected to Le Phare and to Robert Hopkins. Both the Pineview and the Cardinal Heights/Beacon Hill South areas are currently bused to L.D. Billings for the EFI program. The number of students residing in the Pineview area is slightly larger than the number of students residing in the Cardinal Heights/Beacon Hill South area. At a consultation meeting held on 15 November 2000, the community expressed concern over splitting the current L.D. Billings' student population, particularly when some students would be redirected to a current EFI centre and others would be redirected to a current ENG program school. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 Staff does not feel that the students being redirected to Robert Hopkins would be disadvantaged. Instead, the EFI (W students directed to Robert Hopkins would now have access to an ENG program in the same school. Under the current program configuration, an EFI student attending Le Phare would have to change schools to access the ENG program. Input received from the community suggested that, if the student population had to be split, it would be more logical to redirect the Pineview community to Le Phare for two reasons: a historical student association to Le Phare and the community is closer in proximity to Le Phare than Robert Hopkins. The redirection of the Pineview area to Le Phare would result in a consistent pattern of student direction based on program choice (Le Phare for EFI and Carson Grove for ENG). The redirection of the Pineview community for SK -5 EFI to Le Phare will result in an increase in the utilization factor at Le Phare from approximately 60% to approximately 90% in 2001/02. The redirection of the JK ENG, SK -5 EFI program students (less Pineview community) to Robert Hopkins would increase the utilization factor at the school from approximately 50% to approximately 85% in 2001/02. Under the current school times and bus routes, staff would anticipate a moderate increase in busing due to the complexity involved in scheduling multiple bus runs. However, if school times were reconfigured, staff would not anticipate any additional costs in busing. 3. Impact on Projected Enrolments/Utilizations See Appendix #A1 - Projected Enrolments See Appendix #A2 - Status Quo Enrolments (W 4. Attendance Boundary Recommendations See Appendix #A3 - Relocation Maps 5. Other Options Considered In addition to the options provided in report no. 00 -137 and indicated in report no. 00 -187, staff provided two additional options for community input at the consultation meeting held on 15 November 2000 as follows: Redirect L.D. Billings JK ENG, SK -5 EFI to Robert Hopkins Under this proposal, the entire L.D. Billings student population would be directed to one school. Part of the students from the L.D. Billings area in the EFI program would now have access to the ENG program in the same school. However, the Pineview EFI students would be required to change schools if transferring into the ENG program. The utilization factor at Robert Hopkins would be approximately 110 % for 2001/02. Portables would be required at the school to accommodate the increase in enrolment. The option does not address the low utilization factor at Le Phare. Redirect L.D. Billings JK ENG, SK -4 EFI to Robert Hopkins; Grade 5 EFI to Henry Munro; Redirect Le Phare Gr. 5 EFI to Henry Munro; Redirect Carson Grove Gr. 5 ENG to Henry Munro; Redirect Robert Hopkins Gr. 5 ENG to Henry Munro Under this proposal, the entire L.D. Billings student population would be directed to one school. Part of the students from the L.D. Billings area in the EFI program would now have access to the ENG program in the same school. However, the Pineview EFI students would be required to change schools if transferring into the ENG program. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 The utilization factor at Henry Munro would be approximately 105% for 2001/02. Portables would be required at the school to accommodate the increase in enrolment. The option further exacerbates the low utilization factor at Le Phare. In addition to the options provided at the consultation meeting, staff examined the following: Robert Hopkins JK -3 ENG, SK -3 EFI school serving the Beacon Hill area and Pineview for EFI only; Le Phare 4 -5 ENG/EFI school serving the Beacon Hill area and Pineview area for EFI only Under this proposal Robert Hopkins would be at approximately 100% utilization. The utilization factor at Le Phare would be approximately 74 %. This option would result in major disruption to students. The Pineview EFI students would be required to change schools if transferring into the ENG program. Portables would be required at Robert Hopkins. Proposal submitted by the L.D. Billings school council at the meeting of 15 November 2000• See Appendix A4 for details. Redirect L.D. Billings SK -5 EFI to Robert Hopkins Redirect Le Phare SK -5 EFI to Robert Hopkins Redirect Robert Hopkins JK -5 ENG to Le Phare Redirect L.D. Billings JK ENG to Le Phare Under this proposal, the utilization factor at Robert Hopkins would be approximately 100% for 2001/02. Portables would be required at Robert Hopkins to accommodate the enrolment. The utilization factor at Le Phare would increase to approximately 80 %. There would be a significant amount of student disruption. Students would be able to move as a total cohort. There would be one EFI centre to serve the eastern portion of the East family. The absence of a JK ENG program at Robert Hopkins would result in SK students having to change schools for the EFI program. EFI program students, under this option, would not have access to the ENG program in the same school. 6. Community Feedback Copies of all community feedback received has been provided to all Trustees in a separate distribution package dated 24 November 2000. Staff has carefully considered the input received from the community regarding the proposed options for the redirection of students under the closure of Lamira Dow Billings E.S. The following represents some common issues raised in the feedback received from the community. a) There is a concern that there has not been sufficient time to properly examine the proposals or explore other options and therefore request that the relocation decisions be deferred until there is more time to do so. b) The community is divided on the issue of single track versus dual track schools; some parents expressed a preference for a single track EFI centre and others have expressed a preference for dual track schools. c) A concern was expressed about having a dual track ENG/EFI in an unmodified open concept school and the increased noise level. At the consultation meeting held on 15 November 2000, the Principal indicated that Robert Hopkins is not a "fully open concept" school. The school contains "three houses or pods" which have been altered to meet the needs of the students. For example, there are doors on the kindergarten areas. d) Some feel the redirection meeting and process are premature. Outgoing trustees should not be deciding such an important issue. Redirections should only be discussed when all apeals to the closure process have been heard and settled. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 / lJ e) Some expressed concerns that playgrounds at some schools would be impacted by the addition of portables. f) There was concern expressed that the closure of L.D. Billings is ill- timed, illogical and a false economy to the Board. g) Participants wish to keep the students together as much as possible to minimize disruption. h) If staff could move with the students, parents felt this would help to minimize disruption. Under the current collective agreements, staff are not able to move with the students. i) The redirection of the Pineview area to Robert Hopkins would still not provide students with access to an ENG program in the same school since their ENG program school, under the current attendance boundaries would be Carson Grove. This is correct, if the Pineview area were redirected to Robert Hopkins, students transferring from the EFI program to the ENG program, under the current attendance boundaries, would be required to change schools even though an ENG program would exist in the school unless they were able to attend on a student transfer. j) Staff received a significant amount of input regarding the relocation of the MFI program from Overbrook and the desire to have an MFI program remain in the family that would be accessible to all students (including Beacon Hill/Pineview area) in the family. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 APPENDIX Al \I Ottawa-Carleton District School Board East Family 2001/2002 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations RECOMMENDATIONS: Program and Student Relocations Under Lamira Dow Billings School Closure Redirect L.D. Billings JK ENG, SK -5 EFI to Robert Hopkins (less Pineview Community) Redirect Pineview Community SK -5 EFI to Le Phare School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 01/02 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor Jlc/Slc 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Carson Grove 388 4 REG 118 365 483 483 424 -36 109.28% Henry Munro 792.5 0 REG 139 220 19 378 623 623 169.5 78.61% EFI 70 131 201 LFI 19 19 C.GIF 25 25 L.D. Billings , CLOSED Le Phare 338.5 0 REG 32 32 357 316.5 22 93.50% EFI 49 276 325 Manor Park 653.5 0 REG 56 109 165 525 444 209.5 67.94% EFI 60 162 222 ALT 46 92 138 Overbrook ; CLOSED Queen Elizabeth 638.5 0 REG 46 180 198 28 452 641 618 20.5 96.79% EFI 84 84 MFI 105 105 Queen Mary 345 0 REG 81 284 19 384 384 343.5 1.5 99.57% R.E. Wilson 286.5 0 REG 60 239 299 1 299 269 17.5 93.89% Robert Hopkins 460.5 0 REG 46 213 259 452 395 65.5 85.78% EFI 68 125 193 Rockcliffe Park 338 3 REG 46 139 185 415 368.5 -30.5 109.02% EFI 47 183 230 Total 4,241 7 755 2,681 677 66 4,179 4,179 3,802 440 89.64% NUIE: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The above projections assume Board approved closure /redirection of students for Overbrook. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending schools in the East family (Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not take into account ENG /Ul program students, currently attending schools in the Central family (York and Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 01/02 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 3,866 1 375 1 91.16' Ottawa - Carleton District School Board East Family 2004/2005 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations WCOMMENDATIONS: Program and Student Relocations Under Lamira Dow Billings School Closure Redirect L.D. Billings JK ENG, SK -5 EFI to Robert Hopkins (less Pineview Community) Redirect Pineview Community SK -5 EFI to Le Phare School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 04/05 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Carson Grove 388 4 REG 102 325 427 427 376 1 12 96.91% Henry Munro 792.5 0 REG 131 238 19 388 645 645 147.5 81.39% EFI 71 139 210 LFI 22 22 C.GIF 25 25 L.D. Billings CLOSED Le Phare 338.5 0 REG 32 32 373 332.5 6 98.23% EFI 49 292 341 Manor Park 653.5 0 REG 56 84 140 521 440 213.5 67.33% EFI 60 171 231 ALT 46 104 150 rook CLOSED Queen Elizabeth 638.5 0 REG 46 166 190 28 430 642 619 19.5 96.95% EFI 84 84 MFI 128 128 Queen Mary 345 0 REG 83 248 19 350 350 308.5 36.5 89.42% R.E. Wilson 286.5 0 REG 59 211 270 270 240.5 46 83.94% Robert Hopkins 460.5 0 REG 45 188 233 434 378.5 82 82.19% EFI 66 135 201 Rockcliffe Park 338 3 REG 44 120 164 383 337.5 0.5 99.85% EFI 47 172 219 Total 4,241 7 735 2,546 698 66 4,045 4,045 3,678 564 86.71% NOTE: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The above projections assume Board approved closure /redirection of students for Overbrook. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending pools in the East family ( Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not take iccount ENG /LFI program students, currently attending schools in the Central family (York and Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 04/05 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 3,742 499 1 88.23% 1 Ottawa- Carleton District School Board APPENDIX A2 East Family 2000/2001 Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS QUO - Based on September 2000 Enrolment School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 00 /01 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Carson Grove 388 4 REG 127 375 0 502 502 438.5 -50.5 113.02% Henry Munro 792.5 0 REG 134 228 15 377 623 623 169.5 78.61% EFI 70 104 174 LFI 47 47 C.GIF 25 25 L.D. Billings 228.5 0 REG 42 42 266 229 -0.5 100.22% EFI 32 192 224 Le Phare 338.5 0 REG 43 43 233 191.5 147 56.57% EFI 40 150 190 Manor Park 653.5 0 REG 69 137 0 206 575 495 158.5 75.75% EFI 65 167 232 ALT 26 111 137 Overbrook 204.5 2 REG 24 85 0 109 189 177 27.5 86.55% MFI 80 80 Queen Elizabeth 638.5 0 REG 45 187 182 20 434 498 475.5 163 74.47% EFI 64 64 Queen Mary 345 0 REG 54 210 15 279 1 279 252 93 73.04% R.E. Wilson 286.5 0 REG 71 193 9 273 1 273 237.5 49 82.90% Robert Hopkins 460.5 0 REG 46 209 0 255 255 232 228.5 50.38% Rockcliffe Park 338 3 REG 39 132 12 183 409 364 -26 107.69% EFI 51 175 226 Total 4,674 9 774 2,607 1 650 71 1 4,102 1 4,102 3,715 959 79.48% Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board I T - East Family 2001/2002 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS QUO- Revised MOE Capacities for June 2000 School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 01102 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Carson Grove 388 4 REG 118 365 483 483 424 -36 109.28% Henry Munro 792.5 0 REG 139 220 19 378 623 623 169.5 o 78.61% EFI 70 131 201 LFI 19 19 C.GIF 25 25 L.D. Billings 228.5 0 REG 36 36 305 264.5 -36 115.75% EFI 45 224 269 Le Phare 338.5 0 REG 32 32 245 211 127.5 62.33% EFI 36 177 213 Manor Park 653.5 0 REG 56 109 165 525 444 209.5 67.94% EFI 60 162 222 ALT 46 92 138 Overbrook 204.5 2 REG 24 79 3 106 211 199 5.5 97.31% MFI 105 105 Queen Elizabeth 638.5 0 REG 46 180 198 28 452 536 513 125.5 80.34% EFI 84 84 Queen Mary 345 0 REG 57 205 16 278 278 249.5 95.5 72.32% R.E. Wilson 286.5 0 REG 60 239 299 299 269 17.5 93.89% Robert Hopkins 460.5 0 REG 46 213 259 259 236 224.5 51.25% Rockcliffe Park 338 3 REG 46 139 185 415 368.5 -30.5 109.02% EFI 47 183 230 Total 4,674 9 755 2,681 677 66 4,179 4,179 3,802 873 81.33% NOTE: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending schools in the East family (Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not take account ENG /LFI program students, currently attending schools in the Central family C y k and Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 01/02 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 3,866 808 82.71% Ottawa - Carleton District School Board East Family 2004/2005 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS QUO- Revised MOE Capacities for June 2000 School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 04/05 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Carson Grove 388 4 REG 102 325 427 427 376 12 96.91% Henry Munro 792.5 0 REG 131 238 19 388 645 645 147.5 81.399/0 EFI 71 139 210 LFI 22 22 C.GIF 25 25 L.D. Billings 228.5 0 REG 34 34 316 276.5 -48 121.01% EFI 45 237 282 Le Phare 338.5 0 REG 32 32 258 224 114.5 66.17% EFI 36 190 226 Manor Park 653.5 0 REG 56 84 140 521 440 213.5 67.33% EFI 60 171 231 ALT 46 104 150 Overbrook 204.5 2 REG 24 68 3 95 223 211 -6.5 103.18% MFI 128 128 Queen Elizabeth 638.5 0 REG 46 166 190 28 430 514 491 147.5 76.90% EFI 84 84 Queen Mary 345 0 REG 59 180 16 255 1 255 225.5 119.5 65.36% R.E. Wilson 286.5 0 REG 59 211 270 270 240.5 46 83.94% Robert Hopkins 460.5 0 REG 45 188 233 1 233 210.5 250 45.71% Rockcliffe Park 338 3 REG 44 120 164 383 337.5 0.5 99.85% EFI 47 172 219 ITotal 4,674 9 735 2,546 698 66 4,045 4,045 3,678 997 78.68% IN 16: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending schools in the East family ( Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not take into account ENG /LFI program students, currently attending schools in the Central family (York and Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 04/05 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 3,742 1 932 0 vi i i =�iL 1 U d 1 1 O ` 1 I W 12 rr^^ I O LLJ co -1 co Ui O 0) "a ,c \ � S O � •� 1 D OO C4 m •_ OL uj O �! c) LL RON .� L Q' 1 LLI ct It Ifto.RMLJWO 000-- - - - - -- W m W W 0, a G) [m J -�9 m� �Wo a\ Y CL' �>J 0 c r m Mu c d d 3 6 N W d` 0 c 0 N a d m y APPENDIX A3 O w i L i 0. I z W a SC k W i OL m J 0 APPENDIX A4 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board East Family 2001/2002 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations Relocation of students currently attending L.D. Billings (as ner Community Consultation meeting of 15 November) Redirect L.D. Billings SK -5 ER to Robert Hopkins Redirect Le Phare SK -5 EFI to Robert Hopkins Redirect Robert Hopkins JK -5 ENG to Le Phare Redirect L.D. Billings JK ENG to Le Phare School MOE Capacity 00 /01 'Port. Program Grades Estimated OV02 AIDE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK1SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Carson Grove 388 4 REG 118 365 483 483 424 -36 109.28% Henry Munro 792.5 0 REG 139 220 19 378 623 623 169.5 78.61% EFI 70 131 201 LFI 19 19 C.GIF 25 25 L.D. Billings CLOSED Le Phare 338.5 0 REG 114 213 327 327 270 68.5 79.76% Manor Park 653.5 0 REG 56 109 165 525 444 209.5 67.94% EFI 60 162 222 ALT 46 92 138 Overbrook CLOSED Queen Elizabeth 638.5 0 REG 46 180 198 28 452 641 618 20.5 96.79% EFI 84 84 MFI 105 105 Queen Mary 345 0 REG 81 284 19 384 384 343.5 1.5 99.571/ R.E. Wilson 286.5 0 REG 60 239 299 299 269 17.5 93.89% Robert Hopkins 460.5 0 EFI 81 401 482 482 441.5 19 95.87°/ Rockcliffe Park 338 3 REG 46 139 185 415 368.5 -30.5 109.02% EFI 47 183 230 ITotal 4,241 7 755 2,681 677 66 4,179 4,179 3,802 440 89.640/6 NOTE: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending schools in the East family (Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not take into account ENG /LFI program students, currently attending schools in the Central family (York and Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ U61iz. 01/02 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 3,866 375 91.16% Ottawa - Carleton District School Board I East Family 2004/2005 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations Relocation of students currently attending L-13. Billings per Community Consultation meeting of 15 November) Redirect L.D. Billings SK -5 EFI to Robert Hopkins Redirect Le Phare SK -5 EFI to Robert Hopkins Redirect Robert Hopkins JK -5 ENG to Le Phare Redirect L.D. Billings JK ENG to Le Phare School MOE Capacity 99100 Port. Program Grades Estimated 04105 AIDE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Carson Grove 388 4 REG 102 325 427 427 376 12 96.91% Henry Munro 792.5 0 REG 131 238 19 388 645 645 147.5 81.39% EFI 71 139 210 LFI 22 22 C.GIF 25 25 L D. Billings CLOSED Le Phare 338.5 0 REG 111 188 299 299 243.5 95 71.94% Manor Park 653.5 0 REG 56 84 140 521 440 213.5 67.33% EFI 60 171 231 ALT 46 104 150 Overbrook CLOSED Queen Elizabeth 638.5 0 REG 46 166 190 28 430 642 619 19.5 96.95% EFI 84 84 MFI 128 128 Queen Mary 345 0 REG 83 248 19 350 350 308.5 36.5 89.42% R.E. Wilson 286.5 0 REG 59 211 270 270 240.5 46 83.94% Robert Hopkins 460.5 0 EFI 81 427 508 508 467.5 -7 101.52% Rockcliffe Park 338 3 REG 44 120 164 383 337.5 0.5 99.85% EFI 47 172 219 Total 4,241 1 7 735 2,546 698 1 66 1 4,045 4,045 3,678 564 86.71% NOTE: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending schools in the East family (Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not take into account ENG /LFI program students, currently attending schools in the Central family (York and Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 04/05 Shortage of Factor AIDE Pupil Places 3,742 499 88.23 - I LL, T-I OTMWA-CAUETON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Area Review /School Closure Study — Recommendations for Program and Student Relocations (Inside Greenbelt) B. Near West Family I Devonshire School Closure Program and Student Relocation Recommendations 1. Recommendations: Redirection of Devonshire Students (effective September 2001) a) Redirect Devonshire K -6 EFI program students residing west of the CPR tracks to W. E. Gowling School. b) Redirect Devonshire K -6 EFI program students residing east of the CPR tracks to First Avenue School, within the Central family of schools. C) Redirect Devonshire JK ENG program students to the JK -6 ENG program school for their area, based on the JK -6 ENG program boundaries. d) Repatriate "out of boundary" Devonshire students to their home schools /families. Related Boundary Adjustment e) Redirect K -6 EFI program students from that portion of the Agincourt K -6 EFI area located within the Near West family to W. E. Gowling School on a phased basis, beginning with SK students and students new to this area in September 2001. 2. Rationale for Recommendations The redirection of Devonshire EFI program students residing west of the CPR tracks to W. E. Gowling School would utilize existing surplus space at W. E. Gowling. The redirection of K -6 EFI program students from that portion of the Agincourt EFI area located within the Near West family to W. E. Gowling School would: a) utilize existing surplus space at W. E. Gowling; b) be consistent with the family of schools model; c) reduce overcrowding at Agincourt School; d) increase accessibility to an EFI program for students from this area; e) result in transportation savings over the longer term (following the phase -in period) of approximately $30,000; and f) result in no student disruption impact (due to the phase -in period). The redirection of the K -6 EFI program students residing east of the CPR tracks to First Avenue School would: a) utilize existing surplus space at First Avenue; and b) be consistent with the family of schools model. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 Agincourt School would still have a viable EFI program under the recommended changes, with a projected EFI enrolment of 213 students in 2004/05. The addition of a K -6 EFI program at W. E. Gowling would enhance program availability for W. E. Gowling students, providing them with the choice of a JK -6 ENG or K -6 EFI program. The tables in Appendix B I show that the recommended changes would increase the utilization at W. E. Gowling to 89.67% in 2001/02 and 99.85% in 2004/05. It should be noted, however, that these utilizations are based on the school's MOE capacity rating of 687, which under represents the number of pupil places which are actually available at the school. This MOE capacity figure includes 6 rooms that the MOE rated at "0" pupil places when the capacities were originally determined. Three of these rooms are currently used as regular classrooms and the other rooms could be converted to regular classroom use, if required. Adding the capacity of these rooms to the MOE capacity figure results in a "functional" capacity rating of 834. Based on this functional capacity, the recommended changes would result in a utilization at W. E. Gowling of 73.86% in 2001/02 and 82.25% in 2004/05, indicating that there would not be a concern with overcrowding at this school. The Devonshire EFI program students residing west of the CPR tracks who are redirected to W. E. Gowling School would require transportation, resulting in additional transportation costs of approximately $60,000 per year. However, these transportation costs would be partially offset by transportation savings of approximately $30,000 per year over the longer term, following the phase -in of EFI program students residing south of Carling Avenue and the Queensway to W. E. Gowling School (see recommendation "e ") The Carlington Kindergarten School Age program currently leases two kindergarten rooms at W. E. Gowling School. Additional kindergarten rooms would be required to accommodate the students who will be redirected to W. E. Gowling. However, there would still be sufficient space at W. E. Gowling to allow this child care program to continue to lease space within the school. Discussions would be held with personnel from the Carlington Kindergarten School Age program, Facilities and Planning staff and school staff to determine appropriate accommodation requirements for this program. Finally, it should be noted that the recommendations in this report have attempted to address two of the major concerns that were raised in connection with other options that staff presented involving Connaught School as a "receiving" school. These options included the redirection of Devonshire students residing west of the CPR tracks to Connaught, which raised concerns that Connaught would be overcrowded and that the EFI program would not be viable. Under the current recommendations, W. E. Gowling would have more than enough space to accommodate the EFI program students who are redirected to this school. With respect to program viability, W. E. Gowling would have a projected EFI enrolment of 180 students in 2001/02 and 221 students in 2004/05. Under the Connaught options, Connaught's projected EFI enrolments would be much smaller, with 140 students projected for 2001/02 and 128 students for 2004/05. 3. Impact on Projected Enrolments/Utilizations The tables in Appendix B1 show the impact of the recommended changes on Near West family projected enrolments, by school, grade and program, for the years 2001/02 and 2004/05. Appendix B2 provides status quo projected enrolments for the Near West family of schools, for the years 2001/02 and 2004/05, for comparison purposes. Appendix B2 also includes a table showing September 2000 preliminary enrolments for the Near West family of schools. 4. Attendance Boundary Recommendations The recommended attendance boundary changes are shown on the map in Appendix B3. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 5. Other Options Considered Three options were presented and discussed at a November 16, 2000 consultation meeting with the principals and school council chairs from the Near West and Central families of schools. Two of these options included Connaught School as a "receiving" school and involved the redirection of Devonshire EFI program students residing west of the CPR tracks to Connaught. In addition, these options redirected Devonshire EFI program students residing east of the CPR tracks to Elgin Street School. One of these options also included the redirection of Connaught JK -6 ENG program students residing east of the CPR tracks to Centennial School (within the Central family of schools), thereby resulting in slightly lower utilization rates at Connaught. The third option presented at the November 16th meeting was identical to the staff recommendation in this report, with the exception that Devonshire EFI program students residing east of the CPR tracks would be redirected to Elgin Street School, rather than First Avenue School. It should be noted that the final Near West family recommendation was adjusted to redirect EFI program students from this area to First Avenue School, as a result of the Central family recommendation to redirect Elgin Street EFI program students to First Avenue. 6. Community Feedback A meeting was held on November 16, 2000 to present options for program and student relocations under the Devonshire School closure to Near West and Central family principals and school council representatives. Staff considered the feedback received as a result of that meeting, in addition to other correspondence received by November 22, 2000, in developing the recommendations in this report. The two options which included Connaught School as a "receiving" school for EFI program students and which were described in the previous section of the report were not supported by either the Connaught or Devonshire School representatives. The main concerns were that Connaught would be overcrowded and that the EFI program would not be viable. In addition, the Devonshire School representatives were concerned that EFI program students would be redirected to two different schools. The following feedback was received with respect to the third option that staff presented at the November 16th meeting (as noted in the previous section, this option was identical to the staff recommendion in this report, with the exception that Devonshire EFI program students residing east of the CPR tracks would be redirected to Elgin Street School, rather than First Avenue School): • Connaught School representatives supported this option, noting that it established a stronger EFI program at W. E. Gowling than would be provided under the Connaught options and that W. E. Gowling would be able to accommodate the redirected students without overcrowding. • Devonshire School representatives have expressed concerns regarding the critical mass of the EFI program that would be established at W. E. Gowling under this option. It should be noted that they have defined the critical mass required for the EFI program at a dual track school as being 50% of the total school population, which is not necessarily consistent with the Board's formula. They were also concerned that Devonshire students would have to be bused to W. E. Gowling and that EFI program students would be redirected to two different schools. • W. E. Gowling School representatives noted that this option would enhance program availability for W. E. Gowling students and increase accessibility to an EFI program for students from its area. They requested and received confirmation that students from the Central Park development had been accounted for in the W. E. Gowling projections. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 • Agincourt School representatives have expressed a concern that a reduction in their EFI student population may have a detrimental effect on the critical mass of their EFI program. It should be noted that they have defined the critical mass required for the EFI program at a dual track school as being 50% of the total school population, which is not necessarily consistent with the Board's formula. They have also agreed, however, that this option would help to alleviate overcrowding at Agincourt and they have supported the phase -in period included in the option, in the event the option is approved. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 APPENDIX 131 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board Near West Family 2001/2002 Projected Enrolments and Accommodation RECOMMENDATION - PROGRAM & STUDENT RELOCATIONS UNDER DEVONSHIRE SCHOOL CLOSURE Redirection of Devonshire Students (effective September 2001) a) Redirect Devonshire K -6 EFI program students residing west of the CPR tracks to W. E. Gowling School. b) Redirect Devonshire K -6 EFI program students residing east of the CPR tracks to First Avenue School, within the Central family of schools. c) Redirect Devonshire JK ENG program students to the JK -6 ENG program school for their area, based on the JK -6 ENG program boundaries. d) Repatriate "out of boundary" Devonshire students to their home schools /families. Related Boundary Adjustment e) Redirect K -6 EFI program students from that portion of the Agincourt K -6 EFI area located within the Near West family to W. E. Gowling School on a phased basis, beginning with SK students and students new to this area in September 2001. School MOE Capacity' 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 2001/02 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Broadview 739 1 REG 75 297 127 18 517 680 642.5 96.5 86.94% LFI 63 63 GIF 50 50 100 Churchill 399 ALT 94 341 435 435 388.0 11.0 97.24% Connaught 420.5 REG 93 258 8 359 359 312.5 108.0 74.32% Devonshire CLOSED Elmdale CLOSED Fisher Park /Summit 844.5 REG 78 157 241 10 486 696 657.0 187.5 77.80% EFI 82 82 ALT 128 128 Hilson 432.5 REG 54 180 234 477 426.5 6.0 98.61% EFI 47 196 243 W. E. Gowling 687 REG 117 386 16 519 699 616.0 71.0 89.67% EFI 49 131 180 ITotal 3,522.5 1 607 1996 691 52 3346 3346 3,042.5 480.0 86.37% ` June 2000 MOE revised capacities. Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz.. 2001/02 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 3032.0 490.5 86.08% Notes: 1. The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of September 12 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. 2. Projections reflect the boundary and program adjustments approved by Board on 25 October 2000, under the Elmdale School closure decision. Physical Planning 11/24/1000 A Ottawa - Carleton District School Board - Near West Family 2004/2005 Projected Enrolments and Accommodation RECOMMENDATION - PROGRAM & STUDENT RELOCATIONS UNDER DEVONSHIRE SCHOOL CLOSURE Redirection of Devonshire Students (effective September 2001) a) Redirect Devonshire K-6 EFI program students residing west of the CPR tracks to W. E. Gowling School. b) Redirect Devonshire K-6 EFI program students residing east of the CPR tracks to First Avenue School, within the Central family of schools. c) Redirect Devonshire JK ENG program students to the JK-6 ENG program school for their area, based on the JK-6 ENG program boundaries. d) Repatriate "out of boundary" Devonshire students to their home schools /families. Related Boundaly Adjustment e) Redirect K-6 EFI program students from that portion of the Agincourt K-6 EFI area located within the Near West family to W. E. Gowling School on a phased basis, beginning with SK students and students new to this area in September 2001. MOE 00/01 Grades Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. School Capacity* Port. Program 2004/05 Shortage of Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total ADE Pupil Places Broadview 739 1 REG 76 286 122 18 502 665 627.0 112.0 84.84% LFI 63 63 GIF 50 50 100 Churchill 399 ALT 94 349 443 443 396.0 3.0 99.25% Connaught 420.5 REG 94 264 8 366 366 319.0 101.5 75.86% Devonshire '„ CLOSED Elnndaie CLOSED Fisher Park /Summit 844.5 REG 80 146 261 10 497 721 681.0 163.5 80.64% EFI 96 96 ALT 128 128 Hilson 432.5 REG 47 164 211 447 400.0 32.5 92.49% EFI 47 189 236 W. E. Gowling 687 REG 98 426 16 540 761 686.0 1.0 99.85% EFI 52 169 221 Total 3,522.5 1 588 2043 720 52 3403 3403 3,109.0 413.5 778.26% June 2000 MOE revised capacities. Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 2004105 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 3043.0 479.5 86.39% Notes: 1. The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of September 12 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. 2. Projections reflect the boundary and program adjustments approved by Board on 25 October 2000, under the Elmdale School closure decision. Physical Planning 11/14/1000 APPENDIX 132 � 2 Ottawa- Carleton District School Board Near West Family 2000/2001 Enrolments and Accommodation STATUS QUO - Based on September 2000 Enrolments School MOE Capacity' 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 2000/01 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Broadview 739 1 REG 63 315 123 17 518 697 665.5 73.5 90.05°% LFI 78 78 GIF 50 51 101 Churchill 399 ALT 91 320 411 411 365.5 33.5 91.60 %, Connaught 420.5 REG 90 282 10 382 382 337.0 83.5 80.14% Devonshire 302 REG 26 26 205 178.0 124.0 58.94% EFI 28 151 179 Elmdale 420.5 6 REG 78 201 279 564 494.5 -74.0 117.60°% EFI 61 224 285 Fisher Park/ Summit 844.5 REG 280 280 541 541.0 303.5 64.06% EFI 101 101 ALT 160 160 Hilson 432.5 REG 38 148 7 193 193 174.0 258.5 40.23°% W. E. Gowling 687 REG 129 379 508 508 443.5 243.5 64.56% Total 4,245.0 7 604 2070 793 34 3501 3501 3199.0 1046.0 75.36% ' June 2000 MOE revised capacities. Physical Planning 1 N212000 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board --) L. Near West Family 2001/2002 Projected Enrolments and Accommodation STATUS QUO School MOE Capacity* 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 2001/02 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Broadview 739 1 REG 75 297 127 18 517 680 642.5 96.5 86.94% LFI 63 63 GIF 50 50 100 Churchill 399 ALT 94 341 435 435 388.0 11.0 97.24 %, Connaught 420.5 REG 80 256 8 344 344 304.0 116.5 72.29% Devonshire 302 REG 29 29 205 173.5 128.5 57.45 %, EFI 34 142 176 Elmdale 420.5 6 REG 86 191 277 540 472.0 -51.5 112.25% EFI 50 213 263 Fisher Park /Summit 844.5 REG 241 241 451 451.0 393.5 53.40% EFI 82 82 ALT 128 128 Hilson 432.5 REG 39 159 10 208 208 188.5 244.0 43.58% W. E. Gowling 687 REG 116 382 16 514 514 456.0 231.0 66.38% Total 4,245.0 7 603 2031 691 52 3377 3377 3075.5 1169.5 72.45% June 2000 MOE revised capacities. Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus! Utiliz. 2001/02 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 3032.0 1213.0 71.43% Note: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of September 12 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated -in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. Physical Planning 11/22/2000 I Ottawa - Carleton District School Board Near West Family 2004/2005 Projected Enrolments and Accommodation STATUS QUO School MOE Capacity" 00101 Port. Program Grades Estimated 2004105 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor ADE JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Broadview 739 1 REG 76 286 122 18 502 665 627.0 112.0 84.84°/ LFI 63 63 GIF 50 50 100 Churchill 399 ALT 94 349 443 1 443 396.0 3.0 99.25° Connaught 420.5 REG 81 262 8 351 351 310.5 110.0 73.84% Devonshire 302 REG 29 29 191 159.5 142.5 52.81% EFI 34 128 162 Elmdale 420.5 6 REG 88 178 266 521 452.0 -31.5 107.49% EFI 50 205 255 Fisher Park /Summit 844.5 REG 261 261 485 485.0 359.5 57.43% EFI 96 96 ALT j 128 j 128 Hilson 432.5 REG 32 144 10 186 186 170.0 262.5 39.31% W. E. Gowling 687 REG 97 422 16 535 535 486.5 200.5 70.82% Total 4,245.0 7 581 2024 720 52 3377 3377 3086.5 1158.5 72.71% ' June 2000 MOE revised capacities Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 2004105 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 3043.0 1202.0 1 71.68% Note: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of September 12 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated-in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. Physical Planning 11/22/2000 M N a m 7 C d > Q H L LL t C d iC 0 r 5 0 APPENDIX B3 M in m 9 O A c ;a m Op N m m C O L m N.L. N .0 �MM L .O. mQa 3 .0 m _a° �, M, M c c j YI oC E a m O N "ctn`c G V LL A q a m cn M O o C V O Z y m ft a L u Z LL E CD :E m A • r a m � U W O m d d y C N u U) p co!z- _ 14 m C j w cm a E� m cw QZ d Q. M N a m 7 C d > Q H L LL t C d iC 0 r 5 0 APPENDIX B3 I M in m 9 O A c ;a m Op N m m C O L m N.L. N .0 L .O. mQa 3 .0 m _a° �, M, M c c j YI oC E a m O N "ctn`c G V LL A q a m M O o C V r m 3 N O VI m m > O c a L m � Z a CLL! E CD :E m A • r �W ` m � U \\ O m L O 7 m 4y "O C N u U) p co!z- C m O 14 m m N 9 � •- m dm3� j w cm a E� m no m N d LL C . d Na _V W L= C m `4 c O mN y 0 u / w O N in C O C .'2mo I 7 I LTL,-, OTTAWA-CARLETON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Area Review /School Closure Study — Recommendations for Program and Student Relocations (Inside Greenbelt) C. South West Family Merivale School Closure Program and Student Relocation Recommendations 1. Recommendations: Recommendation effective for September 2001 a) Redirect Merivale's student body residing north of Fallowfield Road to Meadowlands for JK -6 ENG and to Parkwood Hills for SK -6 EFI. b) Redirect the Centrepointe East community to Manordale for SK -6 EFI. C) That a one time option to Parkwood Hills P.S. be provided to grades 4, 5 and 6 EFI program pupils in the Centrepointe East community. d) Redirect JK program at Parkwood Hills to Century P.S. 2. Rationale for Recommendations There are three receiving schools involved in the recommended relocation of pupils arising from the closure of Merivale P.S. as follows: Merivale pupils residing in the South West Family are being directed to Parkwood Hills for SK -6 EFI and to Meadowlands for JK -6 ENG. Merivale EFI pupils residing in Centrepointe East which is located in the Queensway South/Knoxdale Family are being repatriated to the home Family of Schools, namely to Manordale for SK -6 EFI. As a result of a community desire to relocate the displaced Merivale EFI population as a whole, a one time option is being provided to grades 4, 5 and 6 pupils residing in the Centrepointe East community which gives, as much as possible, an opportunity to relocate these pupils as a group to Parkwood Hills. At the same time, the SK -6 EFI boundary for the area is being repatriated to a school within the home Family of Schools, namely Manordale. The redirection of the Centrepointe East community to Manordale will serve to strengthen the existing Early French Immersion program at Manordale P.S. The one time option for Centrepointe East to Parkwood Hills serves to reduce enrolment pressure at Manordale P.S. from 120% to 113% for September 2001, declining to 102% for September 2004. The one time option to Parkwood Hills also reduces enrolment pressure at Manordale. A one time option was not granted for all pupils in all grade levels, as the utilization at Parkwood Hills would exceed 120% and would involve a lengthy phase out which would conclude by 2007. This would hinder efforts to repatriate pupils to their home Family of Schools. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 The proposed repatriation of the Centrepointe East community is timely, given that a full area review /closure study (W will be undertaken in 2001 with any changes /closures to take effect for September 2002. It is further anticipated that attendance boundaries will be realigned with the Family boundary and significant changes to existing boundary arrangements are possible. The recommended relocation of the JK program at Parkwood Hills to Century P.S. serves to reduce enrolment pressure at Parkwood Hills and facilitates the direction of the majority of Merivale EFI pupils residing north of Fallowfield Road as a group to Parkwood Hills. The relocation is consistent with the direction of JK pupils to Meadowlands for JK -6 ENG in the area north of Fallowfield Road. In effect, both Century P.S. and Meadowlands would now become the two English program home schools for the area. There are no significant transportation costs associated with the relocation of the JK program at Parkwood Hills to Century P.S. The utilization at Century increases from 82% to 88% for September 2001. Renovations to provide a third Kindergarten room at Century P.S would be required. At the Board meeting of October 25, 2000, Trustees expressed concern at the level of utilization at the receiving schools specifically, in regard to Parkwood Hills. With the relocation of the JK program from Parkwood Hills and one time option of Centrepointe East pupils to attend Parkwood Hills, the utilization would be approaching 116% for September 2001. The capacity of Parkwood Hills can be increased functionally to 464 with minor renovations and serve to reduce the utilization of the school to approximately 108.6% for September 2001 and 104% for 2004. While September 2000 enrolment is lower than expected at Parkwood Hills, the 2001 SK projection for Parkwood Hills is considered conservative given current JK numbers. Enrolment at Meadowlands is also lower than expected and September 2001 utilization is expected to be 113% declining to 102% by 2004. In terms of portable requirements, which in part are a function of school organization and capacity allocation, additional portables would only be required at Parkwood Hills. (W 3. Impact on Projected Enrolments/Utilizations Please refer to Appendix Cl which reflects the impacts of projected enrolments /utilizations by grade and program for the recommended relocations for schools located within both the South West Family and Queensway South/Knoxdale Family of Schools for the 2001/02 and 2004/05 school years. Please refer to Appendix C2 which reflects enrolments for schools in both the South West Family and Queensway South/Knoxdale Family of Schools as of Septemeber 12th, 2000 and status quo projection tables for the years 2001 and 2004 for comparison purposes. 4. Attendance Boundary Recommendations The recommended attendance boundaries are shown in Appendix C3. Note: There are no proposed changes to existing intermediate program attendance boundaries. Pupils residing in the proposed Parkwood Hills EFI boundary are currently directed to Sir Winston Churchill for ENG/EFI/LFI. The Centrepointe East community is currently directed to Sir Winston Churchill for ENG/EFI/LFI. In addition, there is an option to attend Greenbank for grades 7 to 8 ENG. This option is in conjunction with the current JK -6 English attendance boundary in the Centrepointe East community to attend either Briargreen or Meadowlands. It is anticipated that, within the upcoming area review for the Queensway South/Knoxdale Family in 2001, intermediate program attendance boundaries will be reviewed and potentially realigned with the Family of Schools boundary. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 71. 5. Other Options Considered At the meeting with school principals and school council chairs on Wednesday, November 15, 2000, at Merivale High School a total of 4 options were presented. The first option was a reiteration of the August 28, 2000 recommendation in which Merivale's EFI student population was directed to Parkwood Hills for SK -6 EFI and to Meadowlands for JK -6 ENG. The Centrepointe East community was repatriated to the Queensway South/Knoxdale Family of Schools and directed to Manordale for SK -6 EFI. The second option incorporated the same program and student relocations as in option one above, including a relocation of the JK program at Parkwood Hills to Century P.S. The third option proposed the creation of an EFI program at Carleton Heights P.S. The fourth option incorporated a community request for the implementation of a one time option to attend adjacent family schools for the areas of Tanglewood and Centrepointe East. 6. Community Feedback Subsequent to the Board decision of October 25th, 2000 a variety of feedback has been received in regard to the redirection of pupils currently attending Merivale P.S. and specifically for those pupils residing north of Fallowfield Road. The community indicated a prime concern that they would like to see that Merivale pupils be kept together, at least for those that reside north of Fallowfield Road or, if not, that at least some grandparenting be considered. Notwithstanding this overall concern, there was a request from individual Merivale P.S. communities, that Merivale EFI pupils in the Centrepointe East community and within the community of Tanglewood be granted a one time option for all EFI grade levels to attend schools located in the adjacent Family of schools. That is, Tanglewood would have the option to attend Manordale for EFI and Centrepointe East would have the option to attend Parkwood Hills for SK -6 EFI. There was request to also permit pupils in the English program in Tanglewood, currently attending Merivale, to attend Manordale. The requested direction of the Tanglewood community was premised on the basis that transportation would be provided for all pupils to Manordale which would not be the case. The issue for the Tanglewood community was their preference to attend a dual track school. The above noted request results in the direction of pupils that are contrary to the Family of Schools model approved by the Board. The impact of this request was presented as Option 4 in the "Options for Program and Student Relocations for the South West Family" package. In addition, it was requested that a proposed JK relocation from Parkwood Hills to Century P.S. as presented in Option 2 could be combined in Option 4. The recommended option incorporates the JK relocation as proposed in Option 2 and incorporates a request of the community to provide an Option to Merivale EFI pupils residing in Centrepointe East to attend Parkwood Hills. A one time option for grade 4, 5 and 6 EFI pupils to attend Parkwood Hills is being recommended to address community concern. Concern was also expressed regarding the intermediate program attendance boundaries of which no proposed changes are being recommended. An upcoming review of the Queensway South/Knoxdale Family in 2001 will review intermediate attendance boundaries. In regard to busing and vehicular concerns raised in regard to Parkwood Hills, staff is investigating opportunities to improve vehicular circulation in and around the school. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 APPENDIX C1 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board South West Family 2001/2002 Enrolments and Accommodations Program and Student Relocations Under Merivale P.S. School Closure Restore Meadowlands JK -6 ENG Boundary, remove all former Merivale Option areas. Parkwood Hills to serve former Merivale EFI Boundary for the area north of Fallowfield road. JK ENG program at Parkwood Hills relocated to Century P.S. Centrepointe East area SK-6 EFI returned to Queensway South/Knoxdale Famly i.e., Manordale with Grades 4, 5 and 6 EFI pupils provided with one time option to attend Parkwood Hills. School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 01/02 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Agincourt 498 5 REG 96 228 324 636 561.5 -63.5 112.75% EFI 53 259 312 Carleton Heights 418 REG 46 128 113 27 314 314 291 127 69.62% Century 473.5 1 REG 137 337 10 484 484 415.5 58 87.75% J.H. Putman 361 REG 106 10 116 EFI 108 108 224 224 137 62.05% McGregor Easson 229 1 REG 46 170 10 226 226 203 26 88.65% Meadowlands 460.5 5 REG 142 450 592 592 521 -60.5 113.14% Merivale - CLOSED INW Parkwood Hills 436 0 543 504 -68 115.60% EFI 78 465 543 Sir W. Churchill 679.5 REG 389 16 405 642 642 37.5 94.48% EFI 182 182 LFI 55 55 Total 3,556 12 598 2037 953 73 3661 3661 3,362 194 94.56% Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 01/02 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 2,912.0 644 81.90% Notes: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. Physical Planning 11/222000 n �'1 Ottawa- Carleton District School Board South West Family 2004/2005 Enrolments and Accommodations RECOMMENDATIONS P d St d #0 1 t' U d M' n m er r . rogra an u en a oca ions n ova le P.S. School Closure Restore Meadowlands JK -6 ENG Boundary, remove all former Merivale Option areas. Parkwood Hills to serve former Merivale EFI Boundary for the area north of Fallowfield road. JK ENG program at Parkwood Hills relocated to Century P.S. Centrepointe East area SK -6 EFI returned to Queensway South/Knoxdale Famly i.e., Manordale with Grades 4, 5 and 6 EFI pupils provided with one time option to attend Parkwood Hills. School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 04/05 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Agincourt 498 5 REG 93 236 329 630 557 -59 111.85% EFI 53 248 301 Carleton Heights 418 REG 48 142 120 27 337 337 313 105 74.88% Century 473.5 1 REG 139 317 10 466 466 396.5 77 83.74% J.H. Putman 361 REG 123 10 133 243 243 118 67.31% EFI 110 110 McGregor Easson 229 1 REG 46 162 10 218 218 195 34 85.15% Meadowlands 460.5 5 REG 142 398 540 540 469 -8.5 101.85% Merivale - CLOSED Parkwood Hills 436 0 523 484 -48 111.011. EFI 78 445 523 Sir W. Churchill 679.5 REG 451 16 467 704 704 -24.5 103.61% EFI 182 182 LM 55 55 Total 3,556 12 599 1948 1 1041 73 J 3661 3661 3,362 194 94.54% Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 04/05 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 2,883.0 673 81.07% Notes: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. Physical Planning 11/22/2000 -) Ottawa - Carleton District School Board Queensway South/Knoxdale Family 2001/2002 Enrolments and Accommodations RECOMMENDATIONS: Program and Student Relocations Under Merivale P.S. School Closure Redirection of Centrepointe East area SK-6 EFI to Manordale due to Merivale P.S. Closure Centrepointe East Grades 4, 5 and 6 EFI pupils provided with one time option to attend Parkwood Hills Estimated School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 01/02 AIDE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Briargreen 400 3 REG 107 390 0 497 497 443.5 -43.5 110.88% Christie 249.5 REG 56 145 0 201 201 173 76.5 69.34% Greenbank 584 0 REG 256 9 265 492 492 92 84.25% EFI 118 118 MFI 0 LFI 109 109 Knoxdale 412 0 REG 35 35 410 377.5 34.5 91.63% EFI 30 248 278 MFI 97 97 FLesliePark 302.5 0 REG 36 159 0 195 1 195 177 125.5 58.51% Zordale bw 383.5 4 REG 64 234 10 308 482 434.5 -51 113.30% EFI 31 143 1 174 Pinecrest 549.5 2 REG 68 268 207 34 577 577 543 6.5 98.82% Total 2,881 9 427 1684 690 53 2854 2854 1 2,641 241 91.65% Notes: SE at Manordale includes 8 DD pupils Notes: Knoxdale and Greenbank EFI programs include EFI Gifted Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 01/02 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 2,670 211 92.68% Notes: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. Physical Planning 11/22/2000 n NOttawa- Carleton District School Board Queensway South /Knoxdale Family 2004/2005 Enrolments and Accommodations RECOMMENDATIONS: Program and Student Relocations Under Merivale P.S. School Closure Redirection of Centrepointe East area SK-6 EFI to Manordale due to Merivale P.S. Closure Centrepointe East Grades 4, 5 and 6 EFI pupils provided with one time option to attend Parkwood Hills Resident Student Population School MOE Capacity 00/01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 04/05 AIDE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1 - 6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Briargreen 400 3 REG 109 381 0 490 490 435.5 -35.5 108.88% Christie 249.5 REG 46 132 0 178 178 155 94.5 62.12% Greenbank 584 0 REG 252 9 261 528 528 56 90.41 1b EFI 130 130 MFI 40 40 LFI 97 97 Knoxdale 412 0 REG 31 31 355 324.5 87.5 78.76% EFI 30 192 222 MFI 102 102 Leslie Park 302.5 0 REG 38 150 0 188 188 169 133.5 55.87% Manordale 383.5 4 REG 58 191 10 259 434 390.5 -7 101.83% EFI 29 146 1 175 Pinecrest 549.5 2 REG 67 270 226 1 34 597 597 563.5 1 -14 102.55% Total 2,881 9 408 1564 745 1 53 2770 2770 2,566 315 89.07% Notes: SE at Manordale includes 8 DD pupils Notes: Knoxdale and Greenbank EFI programs include EFI Gifted Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 04/05 Shortage of Factor AIDE Pupil Places 2,583 298 89.66% Notes: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. P] Physical Planning 11/2212000 11 APPENDIX C2 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board South West Family ) 2000/2001 Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS QUO - Based on September 2000 Enrolment School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 00 /01 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Agincourt 498 5 REG 86 243 329 629 557.5 -59.5 111.95 %, F ER 57 243 300 Carleton Heights 418 REG 34 132 89 27 282 282 265 153 63.40 °t0 Century 473.5 1 REG 74 369 10 453 453 416 57.5 87.86% J.H. Putman 361 REG 100 100 EFI 100 100 200 200 161 55.40% McGregor Easson 229 1 REG 69 190 9 268 268 233.5 -4.5 101.97% Meadowlands 460.5 5 REG 121 438 559 559 498.5 -38 108.25% Merivale 449.5 7 REG 66 222 288 583 1 533 -83.5 118.58% ER 34 261 295 arkwood Hills 436 REG 63 63 431 364 72 83.49% EFI 71 297 368 Sir W. Churchill 679.5 REG 407 13 420 635 635 44.5 93.45% EFI 168 168 LFI 47 47 _ rT70t 4,005 i 19 675 2395 911 59 4040 4040 3,703 303 92.45% Physical Planning 11/22 /2000 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board South West Family 2001/2002 Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS QUO Estimated School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 01/02 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Agincourt 498 5 REG 96 228 324 636 561.5 -63.5 112.75% EFI 53 259 312 Carleton Heights 418 REG 45 128 113 27 313 313 290.5 127.5 69.50% Century 473.5 1 REG 87 337 10 434 434 390.5 83 82.47% J.H. Putman 361 REG 106 10 116 EFI 108 108 224 224 137 62.05% McGregor Easson 229 1 REG 46 170 10 226 226 203 26 88.65% Meadowlands 460.5 5 REG 117 421 538 538 479.5 -19 104.13% Merivale 449.5 7 REG 45 218 263 566 533.5 -84 118.69% EFI 20 283 303 Parkwood Hills 436 REG 59 59 458 393.5 42.5 90.25% EFI 70 329 399 Sir W. Churchill 679.5 REG 389 16 405 642 642 37.5 94.48% EFI 182 182 LFI 55 55 Total 4,005 19 638 2373 953 73 4037 4037 3,718 287 92.83% Note: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. Physical Planning 11/22/2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 01/02 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 2,912.0 1,093 72.71% Ottawa - Carleton District School Board J U South West Family 2004/2005 Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS QUO School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 04/05 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Agincourt 498 5 REG 93 236 329 630 557 -59 111.85 00 EFI 53 248 301 Carleton Heights 418 REG 47 142 120 27 336 336 312.5 105.5 74.76% Century 473.5 1 REG 89 317 10 416 416 371.5 102 78.46% J.H. Putman 361 REG 123 10 133 243 243 118 67.31% EFT 110 110 McGregor Easson 229 1 REG 46 162 10 218 218 195 34 85.15% Meadowlands 460.5 5 REG 122 379 j 501 501 440 20.5 95.55% Merivale 449.5 7 REG 35 204 239 454 426.5 23 94.88% EFI 20 195 215 arkwood Hills 436 REG 59 59 497 432.5 3.5 99.20% EFI 70 368 438 Sir W. Churchill 679.5 REG 451 16 467 704 704 -24.5 103.61% EFI 182 182 LFI 55 1 55 ITotal 4,005 19 634 2251 1041 1 73 3999 3999 1 3,682 323 91.94% Note: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. Physical Planning 11/22/2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 04/05 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 2,883.0 1,122 71.99% �cl Ottawa - Carleton District School Board Queensway South /Knoxdale Family 2000 /2001Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS QUO - Based on September 2000 Enrolment School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 00 /01 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JKISK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Briargreen 400 3 REG 101 401 0 502 502 451.5 -51.5 112.889% Christie 249.5 REG 57 143 0 200 200 171.5 78 68.74% Greenbank 584 0 REG 258 10 268 518 518 66 88.70% EFI 147 147 MFI 0 LFI 103 103 Knoxdale 412 0 REG 39 39 411 370 42 89.81% EFI 43 266 309 MFI 63 63 Leslie Park 302.5 0 REG 36 146 0 182 182 164 138.5 54.21% Manordale 383.5 4 REG 81 265 10 356 500 448.5 -65 116.95% EFI 22 122 144 Pinecrest 549.5 2 REG 74 265 208 30 577 1 577 540 9.5 98.27% ITotal 2,881 9 453 1671 716 1 50 2890 1 2890 1 2,664 218 92.45% Notes: SE at Manordale includes 8 DD pupils. Knoxdale and Greenbank EFI programs include EFI Gifted. Physical Planning 1112212000 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board q-� Queensway South /Knoxdale Family 2001/2002 Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS QUO School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 01/02 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Briargreen 400 3 REG 107 390 0 497 497 443.5 -43.5 110.88 °b Christie 249.5 0 REG 56 145 0 201 201 173 76.5 69.340% Greenbank 584 0 REG 256 9 265 492 492 92 84.25% EFI 118 118 MFI 0 LFI 109 109 Knoxdale 412 0 REG 35 35 410 377.5 34.5 91.63% EFI 30 248 278 MFI 97 97 Leslie Park 302.5 0 REG 36 159 0 195 1 195 177 125.5 1 58.51% iordale NW 383.5 4 REG 64 234 10 308 453 407.5 -24 106.26% EFI 27 118 145 Pinecrest 549.5 2 REG 68 268 207 34 577 577 543 6.5 98.82% Total 2,881 9 423 1659 690 53 2825 2825 2,614 268 90.72% Notes: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. SE at Manordale includes 8 DD pupils. Knoxdale and Greenbank EFI programs include EFI Gifted. Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 01/02 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 2,670 211 92.68% Physical Planning 11/22/2000 Ottawa-Carleton District School Board Queensway South /Knoxdale Family 2004/2005 Enrolments and Accommodations ,IAIU, UUU rvianoraaie School MOE Capacity 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 04/05 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Briargreen 400 3 REG 109 381 549.5 0 490 490 435.5 -35.5 108.88 °0 Christie 249.5 0 REG 46 132 2,881 0 178 178 155 94.5 62.12% Greenbank 584 0 REG 87.78% 252 9 261 528 528 56 90.41% EFI 130 1 130 MFI 40 40 LFI 97 97 Knoxdale 412 0 REG 31 31 355 324.5 87.5 78.76% EFI 30 192 222 MFI 102 102 Leslie Park 302.5 0 REG 38 150 0 188 1 188 169 j 133.5 j 55.87% rvianoraaie 383.5 4 I hu 1 58 191 Factor 10 259 395 353.5 30 92.18% EFI 25 111 136 Pinecrest 549.5 2 REG 67 270 226 34 597 597 563.5 -14 102.55% Total 2,881 9 404 1529 745 1 53 2731 2731 2,529 352 87.78% Notes: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000/01 allocations. SE at Manordale includes 8 DD pupils. Knoxdale and Greenbank EFI programs include EFI Gifted. Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 04/05 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 2,583 298 89.66% Physical Planning 11/22/2000 O O W O u W r a ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ C ■_ M r •V ,v O O co �w O rz LU V LL �C � y � Q. a� a � � y L � O Zia APPENDIX C3 l� h• O W LLI 0 V Ot 1r S� y /v v♦ Q. i 0 im a� 0 0 Ljj L Y h C/). W 0 she NO WON AMR' l� 211, -may. NOUN` Nom. �� ,�, �„�•,�:•��::�� :'� Me M • iop oft .�... \ l Vii, ii�'�� +,- \0 •� �\ r1� Lq Co cm :..m i v NM UM ii 019 a "�.�.t�v!� �� (• . 'E�� rye �.. �- y q µ �o �m �7 Z 4)ma Q p .� W a N CJ uiO�-co V •i � Q i v NM UM ii 019 a "�.�.t�v!� �� (• . 'E�� rye �.. �- y q µ I TL� OTTAWA-CARLETON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD Area Review /School Closure Study — Recommendations for Program and Student Relocations (Inside Greenbelt) D. Central Family Mutchmor School Closure Program and Student Relocation Recommendations 1. Recommendations: a) Redirect Elgin EFI to First Avenue b) Redirect Mutchmor Congregated Gifted (ENG) to Elgin C) Redirect Mutchmor ENG (less area west of Bronson and less the area bounded by Queensway /Canal/Bank St.) to Hopewell; area west of Bronson to Cambridge; area bounded by Queensway /Canal/Bank St. to Elgin d) Redirect Hopewell Congregated Gifted (EFI) to Glashan e) Redirect First Avenue Congregated Gifted (EFI) to Hopewell 2. Rationale for Recommendations The Central family of schools currently has a surplus of approximately 900 pupil places. Although from a family perspective there is a large amount of space, the amount of space available at each school varies. In some cases, the amount of space is small and limits the potential for the redirection of students in "full block" moves. As staff had indicated in report no. 00 -187, many of the natural geographic barriers, along with streets currently given a "hazard" designation, present some unique challenges regarding the redirection of students associated with the closure of a school facility. In addition, many of the schools in this family are located on small sites where playground space is limited and transportation into some of these schools can be a challenge. The recommendation provided in this report is a slight variation from an option provided at the consultation meeting held on 16 November 2000. With the closure of Mutchmor, approximately 320 ADE students will need to be accommodated at schools within the family.' Of that 320, approximately 120 students are in the congregated gifted (ENG) program. Input received from the Special Education Services (Intellectual- Gifted System Support Team) and a representative from SEAC indicated that these students should be redirected as a "full block" move in order to minimize disruption to the students and to maintain program viability. The remaining 200 students are in the ENG program. Input received from the community suggested that students should be moved in "full block" moves, where possible, to minimize disruption to students. It should be noted that the recommendation provided for the Central family of schools is consistent with the recommendation provided for the Near West family of schools in that students currently residing within the Central family of schools boundary have been repatriated to Cambridge for the ENG program and to First Avenue for the EFI program. J Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 Nb,. Although staff recognizes that it is more desirable to redirect students in a "full block" move in order to minimize disruption, this may not always be possible under the current grade and program configurations of the schools within the family. Under the current grade and program configurations, the redirection of the EFI program students from Elgin to First Avenue would result in a utilization factor of approximately 102 %. Input received from the community indicated that placing portables on site at schools such as First Avenue, Lady Evelyn and Hopewell would be problematic and therefore every attempt should be made to ensure that the utilization factor at those schools does not exceed 90 %. To address this issue, staff is recommending the relocation of the grade 5 -6 congregated gifted (EFI) program students from First Avenue to Hopewell. This would result in a utilization factor at First Avenue of approximately 90% for 2001/02. Input received from the Special Education Services (Intellectual- Gifted System Support Team) and a representative from SEAC did not feel that the relocation of this program to Hopewell would disadvantage students. However, it will create some disruption for current students. The redirection of the congregated gifted (ENG) program and the Queensway /Canal/Bank Street area for ENG to Elgin would result in increasing the utilization factor at Elgin from approximately 80% (under a status quo situation) to approximately 100% utilization in 2001/02. There are approximately 25 ADE students residing in this area. Staff would anticipate that portables may be required on site to accommodate the enrolment. The movement of the congregated gifted (ENG) program students as a "full block" move will help to minimize disruption to students, particularly the students who were relocated to Mutchmor as a result of the closure of McNabb. The congregated special education class (PAC) at Mutchmor would be redirected to Elgin. The redirection of the current Mutchmor ENG attendance area located west of Bronson to Cambridge will address some concerns from a transportation perspective regarding crossing Bronson during peak traffic times. There are approximately 20 AIDE students residing in this area. This redirection would be consistent with the current direction of students just to the north of this area that attend Cambridge for the ENG program. The redirection of the remaining portion of Mutchmor's current ENG attendance area to Hopewell in addition to the receipt of the congregated gifted (EFI) program from First Avenue will result in a utilization factor of approximately 98% for 2001/02 under the current grade and program configuration. Input received from the community indicated that placing portables on site at schools such as First Avenue, Lady Evelyn and Hopewell would be problematic and therefore every attempt should be made to ensure that the utilization factor at those schools does not exceed 90 %. To address this issue, staff is recommending the relocation of the grade 7 -8 congregated gifted (EFI) program from Hopewell to Glashan. This would result in a utilization factor at Hopewell of approximately 90% for 2001/02. Input received from the Special Education Services (Intellectual- Gifted System Support Team) and a representative from SEAC did not feel that the relocation of this program to Glashan would disadvantage students. However, it will create some disruption for current students. The redirection of the congregated gifted (EFI) program students from Hopewell to Glashan will result in a utilization factor of approximately 98% for 2001/02. Staff would anticipate that portables may be required on site to accommodate the enrolment. 3. Impact on Projected Enrolments/Utilizations See Appendix #D1 - Projected Enrolments See Appendix #D2 - Status Quo Enrolments 4. Attendance Boundary Recommendations See Appendix #D3 - Relocation Maps Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 0 5. Other Options Considered In addition to the options provided in report no. 00 -137 and indicated in report no. 00 -187, staff provided two additional options for community input at the consultation meeting held on 16 November 2000 as follows: Redirect Elgin ENG to Centennial; Redirect Overbrook MFI to Elgin; Redirect First Avenue Congregated Gifted (EFI) to Hopewell; Redirect Mutchmor ENG (less area west of Bronson) to First Avenue; area west of Bronson to Cambridge for ENG and Elgin for EFI; Redirect Mutchmor Congregated Gifted (ENG) to Hopewell; Redirect Hopewell Congregated Gifted (EFI) to Glashan Under this proposal, the redirection of the ENG program to Centennial would create a larger, more viable program at Centennial. The redirection of the MFI program students into a school in the Central family addresses concerns raised by the community regarding their desire to have an MFI program located in the Central family. It does not address, however, the concerns raised regarding housing the program at Hopewell. Students at First Avenue in the EFI program would now have access to the ENG program in the same school and would not be required to change schools if transferring into the ENG program. The ENG program students from Mutchmor, for the most part would be redirected as a "full block" move in order to minimize disruption to students. The option results in a more equitable distribution of students among the schools in the family. However, both Glashan and Elgin would be significantly over 100% utilization. Redirect Elgin EFI to First Avenue; Redirect Mutchmor Congregated Gifted (ENG) to Elgin Redirect Mutchmor ENG (less area west of Bronson) to Hopewell; area west of Bronson to Cambridge for ENG and First Avenue for EFI; Redirect Hopewell Congregated Gifted (EFI) to Glashan Under this proposal, the redirection of the EFI program to First Avenue would create a larger, more viable program located within the family. The ENG program students from Mutchmor, for the most part would be redirected as a "full block" move in order to minimize disruption to students. The option does not result in a more equitable distribution of students among the schools in the family. The utilization factor at First Avenue would be over 100 %. In addition to the options provided at the consultation meeting, staff examined the following: Provide an option that reflects the key principle put forward by the Zone 9 elementary school council chairs that shows a 90% maximum capacity at the schools (request from consultation meeting of 16 November 2000). See Appendix D4 for details. Redirect SE (GLP class) from Cambridge to Glashan; Redirect JK ENG at First Avenue to Centennial; Redirect Mutchmor SE (PAC class) to Centennial; Redirect JK -6 ENG, SK -6 EFI enrolment at Elgin to Lady Evelyn; Redirect JK -3 ENG from Mutchmor to Lady Evelyn; Redirect Gr. 4 -6 ENG from Mutchmor to First Avenue; Redirect Hopewell SE (SSU class) to Glashan; cap JK ENG enrolment at 55 and Redirect 5 JK ENG program students to Centennial; Redirect JK -6 enrolment from Lady Evelyn to Elgin; cap JK ENG enrolment at 44 and Redirect 40 JK ENG program students to Centennial; Redirect Lady Evelyn SE (PAC class) to Glashan; Redirect Mutchmor Congregated Gifted (ENG) to Hopewell; Redirect JK ENG at Viscount Alexander to York Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 qy- Under this proposal, there would be a massive amount of student disruption in spite of the fact that staff has tried to keep as many existing programs in their current locations and has moved students, where possible, in "full block" moves. Although all of the schools would have a utilization factor of 90% or less, there would not be an equitable distribution of students. Under this proposal, not all students would have equal access to JK programs in their family. Staff would anticipate that there would be transportation implications resulting from the changes suggested under this proposal. If a 90% utilization factor for schools remaining in the family is to be the determinant for program and grade structure placement, an area review of the family could be a more appropriate approach. 6. Community Feedback Copies of all community feedback received have been provided to all Trustees in a separate distribution package dated 24 November 2000. Staff has carefully considered the input received from the community regarding the proposed options for the redirection of students under the closure of Mutchmor P.S. The following represents some common issues raised in the feedback received from the community. a) There was concern that the consultation on relocations is premature given that the deadline for the review of school closures is 18 December. Furthermore, there is a feeling that there has not been sufficient time to properly examine the proposals or explore other options and therefore requested that the relocation decisions be deferred until there is more time to do so or at least until after final closure decisions have been made. b) There has been a strong demand for an MFI site in the Central Family and in particular at Hopewell. (W To address concerns raised by the community with respect to the location of an MFI program in the Central family, staff provided an option on 16 November 2000, which placed the MFI program at Elgin Street. In consultation with the program department, the MFI program, currently at Overbrook, was redirected as a total cohort to ensure program viability. This same concern for maintaining program viability was echoed by Superintendent Mason at the consultation meeting held on 22 November 2000. Staff also indicated that the placement of an MFI program into Hopewell would result in the re- examination of attendance boundaries and/or program locations within the Central family of schools. C) No school under review in the Central family should exceed a utilization of 90 %. A proposal which would see all schools in the family not exceed 90% utilization could only be properly achieved if all of the current attendance boundaries and program placements were discarded and completely redrawn. In staffs recommendation, attention was paid to ensuring that the utilization factor at schools, with minimal yard space, did not exceed 90% as a result of the relocation of students. d) There is a concern that the enrolment projections used by staff are not up to date nor do they adequately reflect the unexpected increases and decreases in enrolments that September 12, 2000 figures demonstrated. e) There is a concern over the lack of sufficient outdoor space to accommodate the portables that would be required under each option. Play space along with parking lots would be jeopardized as a result of the placement of portables. Additional concerns have been expressed as to whether zoning -by -law and fire safety requirements would be followed. In staffs recommendation, attention was paid to ensuring that the utilization factor at schools, with minimal yard space, did not exceed 90% as a result of the relocation of students. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 f) It is important that when a program is relocated, that critical mass is maintained. g) The special needs of Special Education programs should be respected. Staff met with the program department to receive input with respect to the relocation of congregated gifted programs. In addition, staff met with a representative from SEAL, on 22 November 2000 to receive input on the proposed relocation of congregated gifted programs. Staff have also sought input from the Special Services department with respect to the relocation of congregated special education classes. h) Concern has been expressed as to the forecasted increase in population projections, which would create overcrowding issues. i) It has been expressed that school councils and the communities be involved in the development of options for program and student relocations across the entire Board. This strategy was proposed and investigated in the first phase of the area review exercise. Physical Planning and Transportation 28 November 2000 APPENDIX D1 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board Central Family >U 2001/2002 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations OMMENDATIONS: Program and Student Relocations Under Mutchmor School Closure direct Elgin ER to First Avenue Redirect Mutchmor Congregated Gifted (ENG) to Elgin Redirect Mutchmor ENG (less area west of Bronson and less the area bounded by Queensway /Cahal/Bank St.) to Hopewell; area west of Bronson to Cambridge; area bounded by Queensway /Canal/Bank St. to Elgin Redirect Hopewell Congregated Gifted (EFI) to Glashan Redirect First Avenue Congregated Gifted (EFI) to Hopewell School MOE Capacity June 2000 99/00 Port. Program Grades Estimated 01/02 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Cambridge Street 335.5 0 REG 76 280 16 372 372 334 1.5 99.55% Centennial 337 0 REG 56 156 49 261 261 233 104 69.14% Elgin Street 262 0 REG 36 101 19 156 278 260 2 99.24% C.GIF 122 122 First Avenue 424.5 0 REG 38 38 438 382 42.5 89.99% EFI 74 326 400 Glashan 385.5 0 REG 173 10 183 378 378 7.5 98.05% LFI 79 79 C.GIF 116 116 swell 909.5 0 REG 90 265 105 8 468 887 827 82.5 90.93% EFI 30 185 154 369 C.GIF 50 50 Lady Evelyn 368 0 ALT 84 213 10 307 1 307 265 103 72.01% Mutchmor _ CLOSED Viscount Alexander 179.5 3 REG 53 161 214 214 187.5 -8 104.46% York Street 388 0 REG 34 143 141 318 318 301 87 77.58% Total 3,590 3 571 2,002 768 112 3,453 3,453 3,168 422 88.24% NOTE: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2006,. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The above projections redirect the MFI program currently attending Overbrook in the East family. The above projections include the repatriation of ENG /EFI program students currently attending schools in the Near West family to Cambridge for ENG and First Avenue for EFI. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending schools in the East family (Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not Qto account ENG /LFI program students, currently attending schools in the Central family nd Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 01/02 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 2,943 647 81.99% Ottawa - Carleton District School Board Central Family 2004/2005 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations RECOMMENDATIONS: Program and Student Relocations Under Mutchmor School Closure Redirect Elgin EFI to First Avenue Redirect Mutchmor Congregated Gifted (ENG) to Elgin Redirect Mutchmor ENG (less area west of Bronson and less the area bounded by Queensway /Canal/Bank St.) to Hopewell; area west of Bronson to Cambridge; area bounded by Queensway /Canal/Bank St. to Elgin Redirect Hopewell Congregated Gifted (EFI) to Glashan Redirect First Avenue Congregated Gifted (EFI) to Hopewell School MOE Capacity June 2000 99/00 Port. Program Grades Estimated 04/05 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Cambridge Street 335.5 0 REG 80 258 16 354 354 314 21.5 93.59% Centennial 337 0 REG 57 162 49 268 268 239.5 97.5 71.07% Elgin Street 262 0 REG 36 100 19 155 275 257 5 98.09% C.GIF 120 120 First Avenue 424.5 0 REG 36 36 429 375 49.5 88.34% EFI 72 321 393 Glashan 385.5 0 REG 1 213 10 223 417 417 -31.5 108.17% LFI 78 78 C.GIF 116 116 Hopewell 909.5 0 REG 81 215 137 8 441 868 812.5 97 89.330' EFI 30 186 161 377 C.GIF 50 50 Lady Evelyn 368 1 0 ALT 82 i 200 i 10 292 292 251 117 68.21% Mutchmor CLOSED Viscount Alexander 179.5 3 REG 49 157 206 206 181.5 -2 101.11% York Street 388 0 REG 36 136 146 318 318 300 88 77.32% Total 3,590 3 559 1,905 851 112 3,427 3,427 3,148 442 87.69% NOTE: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The above projections redirect the MFI program currently attending Overbrook in the East family. The above projections include the repatriation of ENG /EFI program students currently attending schools in the Near West family to Cambridge for ENG and First Avenue for EFI. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending schools in the East family (Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not take into account ENG /LFI program students, currently attending schools in the Central family (York and Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 04/05 Shortage of Factor AIDE Pupil Places 2,926 664 81.52% APPENDIX D2 Ottawa-Carleton District School Board 1 . Central Family " 2000/2001 Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS QUO - Based on September 2000 Enrolment School MOE Capacity June 2000 00 /01 Port. Program Grades Estimated 00 /01 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Cambridge Street 335.5 0 REG 72 253 14 339 339 303 32.5 90.31% Centennial 337 0 REG 57 177 50 284 284 255.5 81.5 75.82% Elgin Street 262 0 REG 34 86 120 205 179 83 68.32% EFI 18 67 85 First Avenue 424.5 0 REG 39 39 347 306 118.5 72.08% ER 43 218 261 C.GIF 47 47 Glashan 385.5 0 REG 193 16 1 209 329 329 56.5 85.34% LFI 70 70 C.GIF 50 50 Sewell 909.5 0 REG 60 166 102 8 336 784 731.5 178 80.43% ER 45 182 149 376 C.GIF 72 72 Lady Evelyn 368 0 ALT 94 234 10 338 338 291 77 79.08% Mutchmor 417.5 0 REG 36 168 9 213 330 312 105.5 74.73% C.GIF 117 117 Viscount Alexander 179.5 3 REG 51 169 0 220 220 194.5 -15 108.36% York Street 388 0 REG 32 143 130 6 311 311 295 93 76.03% Total 4,007 3 581 2,027 766 113 3,487 3,487 3,197 811 79.77% Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board Central Family 2001/2002 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS DUO- Revised MOE Capacities for June 2000 Resident Student Population School MOE Capacity June 2000 99/00 Port. Program Grades Estimated 01/02 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Cambridge Street 335.5 0 REG 69 258 16 343 343 308.5 27 91.95 0/0 Centennial 337 0 REG 56 156 49 261 261 233 104 69.14% Elgin Street 262 0 REG 31 79 110 229 202 60 77.10% EFI 23 96 119 First Avenue 424.5 0 REG 38 38 332 294 130.5 69.26% EFI 38 206 244 C GIF 50 50 Glashan 385.5 0 REG 173 10 183 312 312 73.5 80.93% LFI 79 79 C.GIF 50 50 Hopewell 909.5 0 REG 60 145 105 8 318 753 708 201.5 77.84' EFI 30 185 154 369 C.GIF 66 66 Lady Evelyn 368 0 ALT 84 213 10 307 1 307 265 103 72.01% Mutchmor 417.5 0 REG 38 160 19 217 339 320 97.5 76.65% C.GIF 122 122 Viscount Alexander 179.5 3 REG 53 161 214 214 187.5 -8 104.46% York Street 388 0 REG 34 143 141 318 318 301 87 77.58% Total 4,007 3 554 1,974 768 112 3,408 3,408 3,131 876 78.14% NOTE: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending schools in the East family (Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not take into account ENG /LFI program students, currently attending schools in the Central family (York and Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 01/02 Shortage of Factor AIDE Pupil Places 2,943 1,064 73.45% 7 S� Ottawa - Carleton District School Board Central Family 2004/2005 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations STATUS QUO- Revised MOE Capacities for June 2000 School MOE Capacity June 2000 99/00 Port. Program Grades Estimated 04105 ADE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1-6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Cambridge Street 335.5 0 REG 73 240 16 329 329 292.5 43 87.18 0% Centennial 337 0 REG 57 162 49 268 268 239.5 97.5 71.070"o Elgin Street 262 0 REG 31 81 112 242 215 47 82.06% EFI 23 107 130 First Avenue 424.5 0 REG 36 36 314 278 146.5 65.49% E14 36 192 228 C.GIF 50 50 Glashan 385.5 0 REG 213 10 1 223 351 351 34.5 91.05% LFI 78 78 C.GIF 50 50 -)ewell bw 909.5 0 REG 54 110 137 8 309 752 710 199.5 78.06% EFI 30 186 161 377 C.GIF 66 66 Lady Evelyn 368 0 ALT 82 200 10 292 292 251 117 68.21% Mutchmor 417.5 0 REG 35 138 19 192 312 294.5 123 70.54% C.GIF 120 120 Viscount Alexander 179.5 3 REG 49 157 206 206 181.5 -2 101.11% York Street 388 0 REG 36 1 136 1 146 1 318 318 300 88 77.32% Total 4,007 3 542 1,879 851 112 3,384 3,384 3,113 894 77.69% ke I The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending schools in the East family (Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not take into account ENG /LFI program students, currently attending schools in the Central family (York and Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 04/05 Shortage of Factor ADE Pupil Places 2,926 1,081 73.02% A MMIITLIMAv -- MINOR dg wom IILV41 " x plillpw g im wiLi we-ow-loslo RAI afA ggWxy- M 4 SEA, I MIN", lb %�� y ��j WE • • El ww-� !iii // � �'r►�� -.� �� X11 Loc SM AVE ow 1 �. PC �•.X `•` 0 1 �I�IIII ONE . �� .•� ��.�./ .. , ,, ME IS %N'lMl ♦ �w►� • ca o � • AMP, ♦ , AMPIP :4L • • �E .o �U m m N m m a �m U 5 0-- ■M .1) "I • • • �E 10 �U m m N m V a IE U WIN APPENDIX D4 Ottawa - Carleton District School Board J Central Family 2001/2002 Projected Enrolments and Accommodations Utilization factor of 90% at all schools in the family (doer Community Consultation meeting of 16 November► Redirect SE (GLP class) from Cambridge to Glashan Redirect JK ENG at First Avenue to Centennial; redirect Mutchmor SE (PAC class) to Centennial Redirect JK-6 ENG, SK-6 EFI enrolment at Elgin to Lady Evelyn; redirect JK -3 ENG from Mutchmor to Lady Evelyn Redirect Gr. 4-6 ENG from Mutchmor to First Avenue Redirect Hopewell SE (SSU class) to Glashan; cap JK ENG enrolment at 55 and redirect 5 JK ENG program students to Centennial Redirect JK-6 enrolment from Lady Evelyn to Elgin; cap JK ENG enrolment at 44 and redirect 40 JK ENG program students to Centennial; Redirect Lady Evelyn SE (PAC class) to Glashan Redirect Mutchmor Congregated Gifted (ENG) to Hopewell Redirect JK ENG at Viscount Alexander to York Estimated School MOE Capacity June 2000 99100 Port. Program Grades Estimated 01/02 AIDE Surplus/ Shortage of Pupil Places Utiliz. Factor JK/SK 1.6 7-8 Sp.Ed. Total Cambridge Street 335.5 0 REG 73 262 0 335 335 298.5 37 88.9796, Centennial 337 0 REG 139 156 68 363 363 293.5 43.5 87.09% Elgin Street 262 0 ALT 44 213 257 257 235 27 89.69 First Avenue 424.5 0 REG 0 91 91 385 366 58.5 86.22% EFI 38 206 j 244 C.GIF 50 50 Glashan 385.5 0 REG 173 44 217 346 346 39.5 89.75% LFI 79 79 C.GIF 50 50 Hopewell 909.5 0 REG 55 145 105 305 862 819.5 90 90.10°/ EFI 30 185 154 369 C.GIF 122 66 188 Lady Evelyn 368 0 REG 69 148 217 373 320.5 47.5 87.09 EFI 36 120 156 Mutchmor CLOSED' Viscount Alexander 179.5 3 REG 0 161 161 161 161 18.5 89.69% York Street 388 0 REG 87 143 141 371 371 327.5 60.5 84.41 Total 3,590 3 571 2,002 768 112 3,453 3,453 3,168 422 88.24% NOTE: The above projections have not been revised in accordance with actual enrolments as of 12 September 2000. Portable allocation information has been updated in accordance with 2000 -01 utilizations. The above projections redirect the MFI program currently attending Overbrook in the East family. The above projections include the repatriation of ENG /EFI program students currently attending schools in the Near West family to Cambridge for ENG and Lady Evelyn for EFI. The projections do not include the redirection of EFI program students currently attending schools in the East family (Rockcliffe) back to the Central family. The projections do not take into account ENG /LFl program students, currently attending schools in the Central family (York and Glashan), being repatriated back to the East family. Physical Planning 28 November 2000 Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Estimated Surplus/ Utiliz. 01/02 Shortage of Factor AIDE Pupil Places 2,943 647 81.99