The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02 Report 00-088 Area Review/ School Closure Study, Definition of and Proposed Boundaries for Elementary Families of Schools• OTTAWA-CARLETON DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 10 April 2000 Report No. 00 -088 to Board Re: Area Review /School Closure Study - Definition of and Proposed Boundaries for Elementary Families of Schools ORIGINATORS: Rose -Marie Batley, Superintendent of Facilities and Physical Planning Michael Carson, Manager, Facilities, Planning and Transportation Planning Staff PURPOSE /V To seek Trustee approval of a definition to be used in determining families of schools and to identify, in general, the manner in which staff proposes to organize elementary schools inside the Greenbelt for the purpose of delivering programs. BACKGROUND 2. Further to the school closure timeline and process motions approved by the Board on 8 March, 2000, Planning staff is proceeding with the review and organization of elementary families of schools located inside the NCC Greenbelt. 3. Staff was asked to provide a definition of families of schools and proposed organization of school families located inside the Greenbelt for consideration by the Board on 10 April 2000. 4. To obtain feedback on its preliminary proposals, a workshop was held with a group of elementary principals on 23 March 2000. This feedback, along with Planning staff comments, was shared with Director's Council of Superintendents (Appendix A). 5. To obtain further feedback from the community, a memorandum was distributed on 3 April by the Superintendent of Facilities and Physical Planning, which outlined the proposed families of schools. Feedback was requested by Thursday, 6 April 2000. Copies of the responses have been attached as Appendix B. A Gi rc," io t e A S e P a tt' Te 1 Y -r o -to it $tees STATUS In developing recommendations for school closures within the Greenbelt, Planning staff has begun by developing a framework to ensure that sufficient capacity will remain in a geographical area to allow the Board to successfully offer a range of elementary programs. The proposed families of schools are a starting point for the development of options. Planning staff recognizes that the ultimate boundaries for these families of schools may shift as development of closure options and program relocation continues. 8. It is staff's intention that school consolidation options would require students who reside within a geographic family of schools to attend the designated school for that program within the family. Staff has previously indicated that there may need to be groupings of the proposed families, in order to generate critical mass for programs such as Middle and Late French Immersion and Alternative English programs. Some of the feedback received expressed concerns from schools whose current catchment areas straddle the proposed boundaries for families of schools. In some cases, the opinion was expressed that approval of these families of schools would make certain school closures inevitable. Planning staff will be reviewing all boundaries and program placements within the families, when considering school closure options. Staff has not predetermined that any school should be closed. 10. Concerns were also raised about the potential level of disruption involved if historical boundaries and school feeding patterns are not maintained. Planning staff is considering the impact on students and the complexities of program/boundary phase - in/phase -out, while developing the closure options. However, there will be circumstances where historical patterns must be changed to ensure a more efficient use of space. 11. Upon further analysis of enrolments and consideration of comments from principals and others, staff is recommending that the proposed Blossom Park/Roberta Bondar /Sawmill Creek family be combined with the Elizabeth Park/ Fielding family. 12. Staff is proposing that the definition of family of schools be worded as follows: A "family of schools" is an arrangement of schools in a defined area that allows all students in an area to access those programs accepted as standard offerings for elementary schools, where enrolments in the area support the program. Such an arrangement presupposes that current transportation entitlements remain in place. This would allow for the creation of boundaries for certain programs which would be contiguous with family of school boundaries, for program. which could not generate critical mass within the individual family. This is consistent with current practices used %% hen identifying possible sites for Middle French Immersion. 13. Appendix C display s the general boundaries for the proposed families of schools inside the Greenbelt and Appendix D lists the schools in,aude i in each family. 14. Appendix E displays data showing the current utilization of schools within the existing families, as well as a summary total comparing total capacm within a family to the number of students residing in a family. 15. Although this stud% %% ill focus on areas inside the Greenbelt, staff has provided as Appendix F proposed elementary school families for the area outside the Greenbelt. RECOMMENDATIONS A That Board approve the following definition of elementary "family of schools" A "family of schools" is an arrangement of schools in a defined area that allows all students in an area to access those programs accepted as standard offerings for elementary schools, where enrolments in the area support the program. Such an arrangement presupposes that current transportation entitlements remain in place. Special Education program locations would continue to be determined following central administrative decisions pertaining to program need, program access and the availability of surplus elementary school space. B. That Board approve, in principle, the families of schools identified in Appendix D with general boundaries as shown in Appendix C, for use by Planning staff in developing school closure options. ' v 4u__ pie gzAr i Rose -Mane B atley Director of Education and Superintendent of Facilities and Secretary of the Board Physical Planning APPENDIX A C�, • OTTAWA-CARLETON DISTFICT SCHOOL BOARD 29 March 2000 Report to Director's Council of Superintendents Re: Results of 23 March 2000 Principals' Workshop for the Identification of Elementary "Families of Schools ". ORIGINATORS: Rose -Marie Batley, Superintendent of Facilities and Physical Planning Michael Carson, Manager, Facilities, Planning and Transportation Planning Staff PURPOSE To present the results of a principals' workshop that was held on 23 March, 2000, concerning the organization of elementary families_ of schools. BACKGROUND 2. Further to the school closure timeline and process motions approved by the Board on 8 March, 2000, Planning staff is proceeding with the review and organization of elementary families of schools located inside the NCC Greenbelt. 3. A staff recommended definition of families of schools and organization of school families located inside the Greenbelt is required for presentation to the Board on April 3, 2000. 4. A workshop was held on 23 March, 2000 with the purpose of obtaining feedback from elementary school principals with regard to the organization of elementary families of schools. Copies of the agenda and workshop participants present are provided as Appendices A and B. 6. Copies of the preliminary definition of "family of schools" and preliminary proposal for elementary school families presented at the workshop are provided as Appendices C and D. STATUS 7. The workshop participants identified several key areas of concern and presented possible modifications to the proposals presented by Planning staff. These modifications are presented below with a response by Planning staff. 8. The workshop principals agreed with the family of schools definition provided by Planning staff. It was suggested, however, that access to programs such as alternative English, middle and late immersion should be offered to each singular family of schools only and not be extended to include the combination of two or more school families. 9. Planning staff is in agreement with the operational advantages associated with the suggested modification; however, Superintendents should be aware that some smaller school families may have insufficient critical mass to provide some or all auxiliary programs. 10. After further discussion, Planning staff recommends that the definition be amended to read: µ A "family of schools" is an arrangement of schools in a defined area that allows all students in that area to access those programs accepted as standard offerings for elementary schools, where enrolments in the area support the program. Such an arrangement presupposes that current transportation entitlements remain in place. 11. The workshc o principals suggested that the Henry Munro /Queen Elizabeth family of schools (see item 6, Appendi; D) should be split into two smaller families east and west of the Aviation Parkway. 12. Further to : tem 9 above, Planning staff is concerned that this division may create insufficient critical mass to provide some or all auxiliary programs within these school families. 13. The workshop principals suggested that J.H. Putman and Agincourt Schools belong with the D. Roy t:ennedy family of schools family instead of the Carleton Heights /J.H. Putman/Sir Winston Churchlll (see items 1 and 4, Appendix D) family of schools. 14. Planni: ig staff acknowledges that Baseline road acts as a major roadway that divides the City of Ottawa and t1 �e City of Nepean. From a community perspective, however, staff believes that the Copeland Park area :; more closely associated with schools located south of Baseline Road than north of the Que• nsway. 15. Th workshop principals also suggested that W.E. Gowling School (see item 3, Appendix D) belongs w: n a Carleton Heights /Sir Winston Churchill family of schools instead of the Broadview /Fisher Park fa::lily. 16. 'tanning staff believes that an attempt to associate W.E. Gowling School with intermediate program >chools located south of Baseline Road would be strongly contested by the Fisher Park School community due to the fact that W.E. Gowling school currently feeds into Fisher Park School for the regular English program. 17. Planning staff also believes that the travelling distance for students from the W.E. Gowling area to intermediate or other programs located south of the experimental farm would be unnecessarily long in comparison to the travelling distances required to access schools located north of the Queensway. RE -OMMENDATIONS A It is recommended that the Director's Council of Superintendents approve for presentation to Trustees the following definition of elementary "family of schools": A "family of schools" is an arrangement of schools in a defined area that allows all students in that area to access those programs accepted as standard offerings for elementary schools, where enrolments in the area support the program. Such an arrangement presupposes that current transportation entitlements remain in place. Special education program locations would continue to be determined following central administrative decisions pertaining to program need, program access and the availability of surplus elementary school space. B. It is recommended that DCS approve for presentation to Trustees the arrangement of elementary school families provided as Appendix D. 44 - . Rose -Marie Batley Superintendent of Facilities and Physical Planning APPENDIX A Principal's Workshop Agenda: Identification of Elementary "Families of Schools" Mezzanine Committee Room, March 23, 2000 1:30 - 2:00 Welcome Review of School Closure Process to Date Review of Workshop Purpose 2.00 - 2:30 Review of Planning Objectives for the Identification of Elementary Families of Schools 1, a) Geography b) Existing Quadrants C) Program Access 2. a) Facility Evaluations b) Feeder Schools C) Space Utilization 3. a) Student Disruption b) Community and Operational Visioning C) Costs vs. Opportunities 2:30 - 3:30 Identify Workshop Teams Breakaway and Discussion of Workshop Teams Possible Areas /Issues for Discussion: a) Definition of Family of Schools b) Standard vs. Auxiliary Programs c) Factors used to Define School Families d) Preliminary Proposal for Elementary School Families 3:30 - 4:00 Presentation of Workshop Team Conclusions 4:00 - 4:30 Open Discussion and Wrap -Up APPENDIX B P1 Principal's Workshop Teams Mezzanine Committee Room, March 23, 2000 OCDSB East: Sprague Plato, Principal, Henry Munro P.S. Carol Hunter, Principal, Vincent Massey P.S. Pat Hendry, Principal, Hopewell Avenue P.S.. Dodie Wood, Principal, Featherston P.S. Susanne Lutsch, Principal, Lady Evelyn School Doug Tateishi, Principal, Centennial P.S. Don Cram, Principal, Blossom Park P.S. Bill Baird, Principal, Elizabeth Park P.S. Tom Hoey, Principal, Emily Carr M.S. OCDSB West: Charles Austin, Principal, Greenbank M.S. Jacques Torjman, Principal, Briargreen P.S. Erin Linnen, Principal, Agincourt P.S. Phil Davies, Principal, Carleton Heights P.S. Debbie Machida, Principal, McGregor Easson P.S. Trudy Brand -Jacobsen, Principal, J.H. Putman P.S. Bernie Finnerty, W.E. Gowling P.S. Floaters: Michael Carson, Manager, Facilities, Planning and Transportation Laura McAlister, Principal, Special Education Mark Smith, Planner Marc Labelle, Planner Phil Dawes, Planner Ian Baxter, Planning Technician APPENDIX C Family of Schools - Preliminary Definition A "family of schools" is an arrangement accepted d assthe standard offerings etfor a defined area to access those program p elementary schools. Such an arrangement presupposes that current transportation entitlements remain in place. To date, Planning staff has given consideration earl immersion pro of schools rams as standard. at would encompass regular English Y Access to alternative English, late immersion and middle immersion programs would rely on sufficient critical mass and, where necessary, an extension of program boundaries that could include other adjacent school families. Special education program locations would continue to be determined following central administrative decisions pertaining to program need, program access and the availability of surplus elementary school space. OCDSB Planning Department, March 2000. Fol Preliminary Proposal for Elementary School Families: OCDSB Inside Greenbelt for discussion our mq5 o01 • ;• .. BAYSHORE SCHOOL D. ROY KENNEDY SCHOOL GRANTSCHOOL LAKEVIEW SCHOOL REGINA SCHOOL SEVERN SCHOOL WOODROFFE AVENUE SCHOOL BROADVIEW SCHOOL CHURCHILL SCHOOL CONNAUGHT SCHOOL DEVONSHIRE SCHOOL ELMDALE SCHOOL FISHER PARK I SUMMIT SCHOOL HLSON SCHOOL W.E. GOWLING SCHOOL .••4.1 QI4 WE14TZT,99;19IM CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL CENTENNIALSCHOOL ELGIN STREET SCHOOL FIRST AVENUE SCHOOL GLASHAN SCHOOL HOPEWELL SCHOOL LADY EVELYN SCHOOL MUTCHMOR SCHOOL VISCOUNT ALEXANDER SCHOOL YORK STREET SCHOOL a ALTA VISTA SCHOOL ARCH STREET SCHOOL CHARLES H. HULSE SCHOOL FEATHERSTON DRIVE SCHOOL HAWTHORNESCHOOL PLEASANT PARK SCHOOL RIVERVIEW (OTTAWA) SCHOOL VINCENT MASSEY SCHOOL g, Ft IZABETH PARK /FIE! DING FAMILY BAYVIEW SCHOOL ELIZABETH PARK SCHOOL FIELDING DRIVE SCHOOL GENERAL VANIER SCHOOL R. BYRNS CURRY SCHOOL OCDSB Planning Department March 2000 BELLS CORNERS SCHOOL BRIARGREEN SCHOOL CHRISTIE SCHOOL D.A. MOODIE SCHOOL GREENBANK SCHOOL KNOXDALE SCHOOL LESLIE PARK SCHOOL MANORDALESCHOOL PINECREST SCHOOL � •. cu AGINCOURT SCHOOL CARLETON HEIGHTS SCHOOL CENTURY SCHOOL J. H. PUTMAN SCHOOL McGREGOR EASSON SCHOOL MEADOWLANDS SCHOOL MERNALE SCHOOL PARKWOOD HILLS SCHOOL SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL SCHOOL CARSON GROVE SCHOOL HENRY MUNRO SCHOOL L. D. BILLINGS SCHOOL LE PHARE SCHOOL MANOR PARK SCHOOL OVERBROOK SCHOOL QUEEN ELIZABETH SCHOOL QUEEN MARY SCHOOL ROBERT E. WILSON SCHOOL ROBERT HOPKINS SCHOOL ROCKCLIFFE PARK SCHOOL BLOSSOM PARK SCHOOL DUNLOP SCHOOL ROBERT BATEMAN SCHOOL ROBERTA SONDAR SCHOOL SAWMILL CREEK SCHOOL APPENDIX D P1 Proposal for Elementary School Families: OCDSB - Inside Greenbelt 1. D. ROY KENNEDY FAMILY BAYSHORE SCHOOL D. ROY KENNEDY SCHOOL GRANT SCHOOL LAKEVIEW SCHOOL REGINA SCHOOL SEVERN SCHOOL WOODROFFE AVENUE SCHOOL 3. BROADVIEW / FISHER PARK FAMILY BROADVIEW SCHOOL CHURCHILL SCHOOL CONNAUGHT SCHOOL DEVONSHIRE SCHOOL ELMDALE SCHOOL FISHER PARK / SUMMIT SCHOOL HILSON SCHOOL W.E. GOWLING SCHOOL 5. GLASHAN / HOPEWELL / YORK FAMILY 7. ALTA VISTA / FEATHERSTON ' HAWTHORNE I VINCENT MASSEY FAMILY ALTA VISTA SCHOOL ARCH STREET SCHOOL CHARLES H. HULSE SCHOOL FEATHERSTON DRIVE SCHOOL HAWTHORNE SCHOOL PLEASANT PARK SCHOOL RIVERVIEW (OTTAWA) SCHOOL VINCENT MASSEY SCHOOL OCDSB Planning Department, March 2000 APPENDIX D 2. D. A. MOODIE / GREENBANK / PINECREST FAMILY BELL'S CORNERS SCHOOL BRIARGREEN SCHOOL CHRISTIE SCHOOL D.A. MOODIE SCHOOL GREENBANK SCHOOL KNOXDALE SCHOOL LESLIE PARK SCHOOL MANORDALE SCHOOL PINECREST SCHOOL 4. CARLETON HEIGHTS / J.H. PUTMAN / SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL FAMILY AGINCOURT SCHOOL CARLETON HEIGHTS SCHOOL CENTURY SCHOOL J. H. PUTMAN SCHOOL McGREGOR EASSON SCHOOL MEADOWLANDS SCHOOL MERNALESCHOOL PARKWOOD HILLS SCHOOL SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL SCHOOL 6. HENRY MUNRO / QUEEN ELIZABETH FAMILY CARSON GROVE SCHOOL HENRY MUNRO SCHOOL L. D. BILLINGS SCHOOL LE PHARE SCHOOL MANOR PARK SCHOOL OVERBROOK SCHOOL QUEEN ELIZABETH SCHOOL QUEEN MARY SCHOOL ROBERT E. WILSON SCHOOL ROBERT HOPKINS SCHOOL ROCKCLIFFE PARK SCHOOL 8. BLOSSOM PARK / ROBERTA BONDAR / SAWMILL CREEWELIZABETH PARK /FIELDINGFAMILY BLOSSOM PARK SCHOOL DUNLOP SCHOOL ROBERT BATEMAN SCHOOL ROBERTA BONDAR SCHOOL SAWMILL CREEK SCHOOL BAYVIEW SCHOOL ELIZABETH PARK SCHOOL FIELDING DRIVE SCHOOL GENERAL VANIER SCHOOL R. BYRNS CURRY SCHOOL CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL ELGIN STREET COL ELGIN STREET SCHOOL FIRST AVENUE SCHOOL GLASHAN SCHOOL HOPEWELL SCHOOL LADY EVELYN SCHOOL MUTCHMOR SCHOOL VISCOUNT ALEXANDER SCHOOL YORK STREET SCHOOL 7. ALTA VISTA / FEATHERSTON ' HAWTHORNE I VINCENT MASSEY FAMILY ALTA VISTA SCHOOL ARCH STREET SCHOOL CHARLES H. HULSE SCHOOL FEATHERSTON DRIVE SCHOOL HAWTHORNE SCHOOL PLEASANT PARK SCHOOL RIVERVIEW (OTTAWA) SCHOOL VINCENT MASSEY SCHOOL OCDSB Planning Department, March 2000 APPENDIX D 2. D. A. MOODIE / GREENBANK / PINECREST FAMILY BELL'S CORNERS SCHOOL BRIARGREEN SCHOOL CHRISTIE SCHOOL D.A. MOODIE SCHOOL GREENBANK SCHOOL KNOXDALE SCHOOL LESLIE PARK SCHOOL MANORDALE SCHOOL PINECREST SCHOOL 4. CARLETON HEIGHTS / J.H. PUTMAN / SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL FAMILY AGINCOURT SCHOOL CARLETON HEIGHTS SCHOOL CENTURY SCHOOL J. H. PUTMAN SCHOOL McGREGOR EASSON SCHOOL MEADOWLANDS SCHOOL MERNALESCHOOL PARKWOOD HILLS SCHOOL SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL SCHOOL 6. HENRY MUNRO / QUEEN ELIZABETH FAMILY CARSON GROVE SCHOOL HENRY MUNRO SCHOOL L. D. BILLINGS SCHOOL LE PHARE SCHOOL MANOR PARK SCHOOL OVERBROOK SCHOOL QUEEN ELIZABETH SCHOOL QUEEN MARY SCHOOL ROBERT E. WILSON SCHOOL ROBERT HOPKINS SCHOOL ROCKCLIFFE PARK SCHOOL 8. BLOSSOM PARK / ROBERTA BONDAR / SAWMILL CREEWELIZABETH PARK /FIELDINGFAMILY BLOSSOM PARK SCHOOL DUNLOP SCHOOL ROBERT BATEMAN SCHOOL ROBERTA BONDAR SCHOOL SAWMILL CREEK SCHOOL BAYVIEW SCHOOL ELIZABETH PARK SCHOOL FIELDING DRIVE SCHOOL GENERAL VANIER SCHOOL R. BYRNS CURRY SCHOOL IQ Ottawa- Carleton District School Board APPENDIX E Summary of Elementary Utilization Factors and Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places Utilization Based On School Enrolment School MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99/00 ADE' Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places ° /° Utilization D. Roy Kennedy 2860 2308.5 551.5 80.72% Broadview /Fisher Park 4333 3212.0 1121.0 74.131% D. A. Moodie /Greenbank/Pinecrest 4014 3589.0 425.0 89.41% Carleton Heights/JHPutman/Sir Winston Churchill 4091 3762.0 329.0 91.96% Glashan/Hopewell/York 4094 3231.0 863.0 78.92% Henry Munro /Queen Elizabeth 4771 3776.0 995.0 79.140/6 Blossom /Elizabeth/Fielding/R.Bondar /Sawmill 4379 4191.0 188.0 95.71% Alta Vista/Featherston/HawthomeN .Massey 4124 3746.0 378.0 90.83% Total 32666 27815.5 4850.5 85.15% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 4851 100% 1760 90% Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Family MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99/00 ADE' Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places ° /° Utilization D. Roy Kennedy 2860 2849.5 10.5 99.63% Broadview/Fisher Park 4333 3167.5 1165.5 73.10% D. A. Moodie /Greenbank/Pinecrest 4014 3406.5 607.5 84.870/6 Carleton Heights/JHPutman/Sir Winston Churchill 4091 2946.0 1145.0 72.01% Glashan/Hopewell/York 4094 3041.0 1053.0 74.28% Henry Munro/Queen Elizabeth 4771 3815.5 955.5 79.970/6 Blossom/ Elizabeth / Fielding /R.Bondar /Sawmill 4379 4335.0 44.0 99.00% Alta Vista/Featherston/Hawthome/V.Massey 4124 3581.0 543.0 86.83% Total 32666 27142.0 5524.0 83.09% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 5524 100% 2508 90% Notes: The estimated 1999 -00 Average Daily Enrolment (ADE) is based on actual 29 October 1999 Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment. (FTE enrolment = half the JK/SK enrolment plus enrolment in Grades 1 -8 & SE). Physical Planning Revised 04107 12000 Ottawa- Carleton District School Board /6 Elementary Utilization Factors and Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places D. Roy Kennedy Family Utilization Summary Utilization Based On School Enrolment School MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99/00 ADE* Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places % Utilization Bayshore 646 441.0 205.0 68.27% D.Roy Kennedy 570 577.0 -7.0 101.23% Grant 259 227.0 32.0 87.64% Lakeview 225 167.5 57.5 74.44% Regina 318 225.0 93.0 70.75% Severn 346 291.5 54.5 84.25% Woodroffe 496 1 379.5 116.5 76.51% ITotal 2860 1 2308.5 551.5 80.72% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 552 100% 295 90% ut;;i�at ;en Rased On Resident Student Povulation Target Space Reductions Pupil Places MOE Capacity Estimated 99/00 Surplus/Shortage of % Utilization Family (10 March 2000) ADE* Pupil Places D. Roy Kennedy 2860 2849.5 10.5 99.63% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 11 100% -306 90% Notes: * The estimated 1999 -00 Average Daily Enrolment (ADE) is based on actual 29 October 1999 Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment. (FTE enrolment = half the JK/SK enrolment plus enrolment in Grades 1 -8 8 SE). Physical Planning Revised 04107 12000 p4- Ottawa - Carleton District School Board Elementary Utilization Factors and Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places Broadview/Fisher Park Family Utilization Summary Utilization Based On School Enrolment School MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99/00 ADE' Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places % Utilization Broadview 754 704.5 49.5 93.44% Churchill 408 377.5 30.5 92.52% Connaught 430 314.5 115.5 73.14% Devonshire 309 182.0 127.0 58.90% Elmdale 430 493.5 -63.5 114.77% Fisher Park/Summit 859 511.0 348.0 59.49% Hilson 442 200.0 242.0 45.25% W.E. Gowling 701 429.0 272.0 61.20% Total 4333 3212.0 1121.0 74.13% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 1121 100% 764 90% Utilization Based On Resident Student Pop ulation Target Space Reductions Pupil Places MOE Capacity Estimated 99/00 Surplus/Shortage of 814 Family (10 March 2000) ADE' Pupil Places % Utilization Broadview /Fisher Park 4333 3167.5 1165.5 1 73.10% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 1166 100% 814 90% Notes: The estimated 1999 -00 Average Dairy Enrolment (ADE) is based on actual 29 October 1999 Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment. (FTE enrolment = half the JK/SK enrolment plus enrolment in Grades 1 -8 & SE). Physical Planning Revised 0410712000 Ottawa- Carleton District School Board Elementary Utilization Factors and Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places D.A. Moodie/Greenbank Family Utilization Summary Utilization Based On School Enrolment School MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99/00 ADE` Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places % Utilization Bell's Comers 530 438.0 92.0 82.64% Briargreen 409 478.0 -69.0 116.87% Christie 255 169.5 85.5 66.47% D.A. Moodie 542 521.0 21.0 96.13% Greenbank 595 486.0 109.0 81.68% Knoxdale 421 332.0 89.0 78.86% Leslie Park 309 177.0 132.0 57.28% Manordale 392 448.5 -56.5 114.41% Pinecrest 561 539.0 22.0 96.08% Total 4014 3589.0 1 425.0 89.41% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 425 100% 26 90% ►►#,Ilse#,^^ Record nn Rec %dent Student Penulatinn Tar et Space Reductions Pupil Places MOE Capacity Estimated 99100 Surplus/Shortage of % Utilization Family (10 March 2000) ADE' Pupil Places D.A. Moodie/Greenbank/Pinecrest 4014 3406.5 607.5 84.879/6 Tar et Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 608 100% 229 90% Notes: " The estimated 1999 -00 Average Daily Enrolment (ADE) is based on actual 29 October 1999 Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment (FTE enrolment = half the JK/SK enrolment plus enrolment in Grades 1-8 & SE). Physical Planning Revised 0410712000 Ottawa- Carleton District School Board Elementary Utilization Factors and Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places Carleton Heights/JHPutman/Sir Winston Churchill Family Utilization Summary Utilization Based On School Enrolment School MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99/00 ADE' Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places % Utilization Agincourt Road 509 548.5 -39.5 107.76 b Carleton Heights 427 259.5 167.5 60.77% Century 484 448.5 35.5 92.67% J. H. Putman 368 227.0 141.0 61.F8% McGregor Easson 234 206.0 28.0 88 )30/0 Meadowlands 471 524.0 -53.0 11..25% Merivale 459 568.5 -109.5 V-3.86% Parkwood Hills 446 364.0 82.0 61.61% Sir W. Churchill 693 616.0 77.0 88.89% Total 4091 3762.0 329.0 91.96% Target Space Reductio -ns Pupil Places % Utilization 329 100% -89 90% Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Family OE Capacity Estimated 99/00 Surplus/Shortape of 8:8 y (10 March 2000) ADE' Pupil Places %Utilization Carleton Hei hts/JHPutman/Sir Win 4091 2946.0 1145.0 1 72.01% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 1V-,5 100% 8:8 90% Notes: The estimated 1999 -00 Average Daily Enrolment (ADE) is based on actual 29 October 1999 Full -Time Ecuivalent (FTE) enrolment. (FTE enrolment = half the JKISK enrolment plus enrolment in Grades 1 -8 & SE). Physical Planning Revised 0410712000 Ottawa- Carleton District School Board 17 Elementary Utilization Factors and Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places Glashan/HoaewelUYork Family Utilization Summary Utilization Based On School Enrolment School MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99/00 ADE' Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places % Utilization Cambridge 343 294.0 49.0 85.71% Centennial 342 236.0 106.0 69.01% Elgin Street 268 194.0 74.0 72.39% First Avenue 434 323.5 110.5 74.54% Glashan 393 385.0 8.0 97.96% Hopewell 4g `! 715.5 214.5 76.94% Lady Evelyn 377 286.0 91.0 75.86% Mutchmor 427 317.0 110.0 74.24% Viscount Alexander 184 198.5 -14.5 107.88% York 396 281.5 114.5 71.09% Total 4094 3231.0 863.0 78.92% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 863 100% 504 90% ►H►►►7Afinn RACn_d On Resident Student Population Family MOE Capacity Estimated 99100 Surplus/Shortage of % Utilization 90% (10 March 2000) ADE' Pupil Places Glashan/Ho ewell/York 4094 3041.0 1053.0 1 74.28% Tar et S ace Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 1053 100% 715 90% Notes: The estimated 1999 -00 Average Daily Enrolment (ADE) is based on actual 29 October 1999 Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment (FTE enrolment = half the JK/SK enrolment plus enrolment in Grades 1-8 & SE). Shading denotes school capacity change since March 29, 1999 Physical Planning Revised 0410722000 Ottawa- Carleton District School Board 15- - Elementary Utilization Factors and Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places Henry Munro/Queen Elizabeth Family Utilization Summary Utilization Based On School Enrolment School MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99/00 ADE' Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places % Utilization Carson Grove 396 416.0 -20.0 105.05% Henry Munro 808 586.0 222.0 72.52% Le Phare 346 214.0 132.0 61.85% L. D. Billings 234 241.0 -7.0 102.99% Manor Park 668 504.0 164.0 75.45% Overbrook 209 163.0 46.0 77.99% Queen Elizabeth 651 484.0 167.0 74.35% Queen Mary 352 256.5 95.5 72.87% Robert E. Wilson 292 260.0 32.0 89.04% Robert Hopkins 470 268.0 202.0 57.02% Rockcliffe Park 1 345 383.5 -38.5 111.16% Total 1 4771 3776.0 995.0 79.14% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 995 100% 575 90% Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Family y OE Capacity Estimated 99/00 Surplus/Shortage of ° Utilization /° 90% (10 March 2000) ADE• Pupil Places Henry Munro /Queen Elizabeth 4771 3815.5 955.5 79.97% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 956 100% 532 90% Notes: The estimated 1999 -00 Average Daily Enrolment (ADE) is based on actual 29 October 1999 Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment. (FTE enrolment = half the JK/SK enrolment plus enrolment in Grades 1 -8 S SE). Physical Planning Revised 0410712000 Ottawa- Carleton District School Board IT Elementary Utilization Factors and Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places Blossom Park/Elizabeth Park/Fielding/Roberta Bondar /Sawmill Creek Family Utilization Summary N:I:�sFinn Rsca�/ An Ghnn1 Fnrohn"t School MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99100 ADE• Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places % Utilization Bayview 309 204.0 105.0 66.02% Blossom Park 354.0 55.0 86.55% Dunlop 359 294.5 64.5 82.03% Elizabeth Park 279.5 -279.5 n/a Fielding 664 605.0 59.0 91.11% General Vanier 234 168.5 65.5 72.01% Robert Bateman 654 577.5 76.5 88.30% Roberta Bondar 773.0 4.0 99.49% R. Byms Curry 327 299.5 27.5 91.59% Sawmill Creek 646 635.5 10.5 98.37% Total 1 4379 1 4191 188 1 95.71% Target Soace Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 188 100% -278 90% Jt/lization Based On Resident Student Po u/ation Family MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99/00 ADE• surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places % Utilization Biossom/Elizabeth/Fieldin .Bondar /Sawmill 4379 4335.0 44.0 99.00 ° /a Target Soace Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 44 100% -438 90% Notes: The estimated 1999 -00 Average Daily Enrolment (ADE) is based on actual 29 October 1999 Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment. (FTE enrolment = half the JK/SK enrolment plus enrolment in Grades 1-8 8 SE). Shading denotes school capacity change since March 29, 1999 Physical Planning Revised 0410712000 pjD Ottawa - Carleton District School Board O( Elementary Utilization Factors and Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places Alta Vista /Featherston/Hawthome/Vincent Massey Family Utilization Summary Utilization Based On School Enrolment School MOE Capacity (10 March 2000) Estimated 99/00 ADE• Surplus/Shortage of Pupil Places % Utilization Alta Vista 745 537.5 207.5 72.15% Arch Street 343 293.5 49.5 85.57% Charles Hulse 560 482.5 77.5 86.16% Featherston 454 560.5 -106.5 123.46% Hawthorne 545 543.0 2.0 99.63% Pleasant Park 309 317.5 -8.5 102.75% Riverview (Ottawa) 408 354.5 53.5 86.89% Vincent Massey 760 657.0 103.0 86.45% Total 4124 3746.0 378.0 90.83% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 378 100% -38 90% Utilization Based On Resident Student Population Family MOE Capacity Estimated 99/00 Surplus/Shortage of Utilization 90% (10 March 2000) ADE' Pupil Places Alta Vista /Featherston/HawthomeN.Masse 4124 3581.0 543.0 86.83% Target Space Reductions Pupil Places % Utilization 543 100% 145 90% Notes: The estimated 1999 -00 Average Daily Enrolment (ADE) is based on actual 29 October 1999 Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) enrolment. (FTE enrolment = half the JK/SK enrolment plus enrolment in Grades 1-8 & SE). Physical Planning Revised 0410712000 Preliminary Proposal for Elementary School Families: OCDSB — Outside Greenbelt (for discussion purposes only) 1. Gloucester Family (East Urban Area including Blackburn Hamlet) Convent Glen ES Emily Can MS Forest Valley ES Glen Ogilvie PS Henry Larsen ES Orleans Wood ES Terry Fox ES 2. Osgoode Family Castor Valley ES Greely ES Metcalfe PS Osgoode PS 3. Rideau Family APPENDIX F o;�/- 6. West Carleton Family Fitzroy Centennial PS Fitzroy Harbour PS Huntley Centennial PS Stonecrest ES Torbolton PS 7. Goulboum Family A. Lorne Cassidy ES Goulboum MS _ Munster PS Richmond PS Stittsville PS Kars PS Manotick PS North Gower /Marlborough PS Rideau Valley MS 4. Nepean Family (South Urban Area) Barrhaven ES Cedarview MS Jockvale ES Mary Honeywell ES S. Kanata Family Bridlewood CES Castlefrank ES Glen Cairn PS John Young ES Katimavik ES Roland Michener PS Stephen Leacock PS W.E. Johnston PS W.O. Mitchell ES S. Cumberland Family (East Urban Area and Rural) Dunning Foubert ES Fallingbrook CES Maple Ridge ES. Meadowview PS Queenswood PS Riverview PS Trillium ES