HomeMy WebLinkAbout05 Report 00-232 Suspension for School Year Period September 1999-June 200014/
OTTAWA CAUETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
October 25, 2000
Report No. 00 -232 to the Chairs' Committee
Re: Suspension for School Year Period September 1999 - June 2000
ORIGINATOR(S): Ross M. Donaldson, Superintendent of Schools
Dan Wiseman, Coordinator of Student Services and Community Outreach
PURPOSE
1. A summary report on suspensions shall be prepared and submitted to the Board twice a year. Reports on
suspensions shall be made public after removing any identification of individual students.
BACKGROUND..
2. The Board through Policy P.020.SCO and the Ministry of Education in the September Board Report
requires reporting of suspension data.
3. Procedure PR.511.SCO outlines operating procedures, notification requirements and stipulates reasons for
suspensions as provided in the Education Act Section 23.(1). These categories are codified as follows and
include:
a) Code 1, persistent truancy,
b) Code 2, persistent opposition to authority,
c) Code 3, habitual neglect of duty,
d) Code 4, use of profane or improper language,
e) Code 5, willful destruction of school property,
f) Code 6, conduct injurious to the moral tone of the school or to the physical or mental
well-being of others in the school.
4. These codes, 1-6, are the only formal reasons for suspensions and as such are carried forward as
descriptors in the summary report attached.
5. A principal may suspend a student for a fixed period of time, up to 20 days.
6. Mandatory suspensions are specified in selected board procedures.
7. Whereas some behaviours require a mandatory suspension, all other suspensions are considered, by the
principal, within the context of the individual circumstances of the presenting behaviour.
8. Each school is required to develop school codes of behaviour which outlines, among other things, student
responsibilities, consequences and other matters relating to student behaviour and suspensions. This
document is reviewed on an annual basis with all students.
9. These in- school interventions in collaboration with parents, along with school personnel, apply
(W specific consequences to the circumstances of the behaviour and include but are not limited to the
following options:
utilization and deployment of in- school resources e.g. guidance, special education learning centre
support, along with other resources unique to the school;
O' a) referral and intervention by school social worker, school psychologist, special education
resources, coordinated through the principal and the school -based multi- disciplinary
teams;
b) referral, on recommendation through to the appropriate process by the Special Education
and Student Services Delivery Model to more intensive classroom/ intervention support
as required, e.g. Itinerant Education Assistant Support, Special Support Units, or services
of the Central Behavioural Support Team;
C) referral, through the principal and the multi- disciplinary team, and with parental
consent, to outside educational and therapeutic resources e.g. Section 19, Prince of Wales
Alternate, Back on Track (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario) and the School
Resource Officer program where appropriate or required. (Violence -Free Schools Policy),
d) referral by principal and school superintendent to the Critical Incident Review Process as
outlined in OCDSB Procedure PR.528.SCO.
10. Following any lengthy student absence, either for suspension dr referral to programs (i.e. Section 19)
outside the board, a school based reentry plan is developed.
11. Trustees requested at the October 271h,1999 meeting of the Chairs' Committee that the following
be added to any subsequent reports:
a) the total number of school days missed due to suspension;
b) a yearly comparative analysis be presented annually during the October report to Chairs,
(analysis for the September to January report is as Appendix A and B);
c)- the current student enrolment beside the name of school on the school -by- school summary;
d) the separation of high schools from elementary schools; and
e) a summary of suspension appeals for the reporting period
f) Trustees requested at the April 27, 2000 meeting of the Chairs Committee that the percentage
relative to the student population be reported.
12. All schools have reported and those schools with five or less suspensions have not
been included in the report, although the totals are reported under the heading "Five or Less ".
13. 1999 -00 was the first year in which the data collection was consistent across the OCDSB
STATUS
14. The preliminary analysis of elementary and secondary suspensions is attached as Appendix A and B.
15. The suspension data for the period September 1999 -June 2000 is attached as Appendix C.
16. Two items of clarification are to be noted with respect to Appendix C.
a) the column 3x+ implies that one student could have more than three suspensions and
therefore the number "3" could imply one student with 3 suspensions, one student with four
suspensions and one student with 5 suspensions,
b) the numbers reported in the columns dealing with "codes" will exceed frequently the number
reported in the suspensions column because a student may be suspended for an
incident that would be reported in more than one category.
17. Summary of OCDSB School Suspensions is attached as Appendix D.
18. A lineal comparative analysis of last year compared to this year has been included as Appendix E.
19. The comparison is provided. Too much emphasis should not be placed in the increased numbers for the
reasons stated in paragraph 13.
20. The Safe Schools Act 2000 (Bill 81) which will be implemented over the next 18 months will impact
significantly the future reports, most specifically the following sections, of The Act, 306.(1) Mandatory Vj
Suspensions and 309.(1) Mandatory Expulsion.
'f3.
RECOMMENDATION(S)
A. THAT the attached report be received.
B. THAT the data provided in this report for the year Sept. '99 - June '00 be established as baseline data
(W for future comparatives.
C. THAT school superintendents review individual school data with the school principal.
James P. Grieve Ross M. Donaldson
Director of Education/Secretary of the Board Superintendent of Schools
OTTAWA CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Appendix A
Elementary Summary
1. 110 of 121 elementary schools reported suspensions.
2. (A) 77 elementary schools reporting suspensions are identified in the report.
(B) there were 44 elementary schools reporting 5 or fewer suspensions and these are
identified under the title of Five or Fewer.
3. Of the 51,504 elementary school population, 1839 students were suspended during the
reporting period. This represents 3.57 % of the population.
4. For the 51,504 students there were 190 instructional days in the reporting period for a
potential total of 9,785,760 gross student instructional days.
(W 5. The 1,839 suspended students were absent for 7, 373 instructional days.
6. These lost instructional days represent 0.08 % of the total instructional days.
7. The highest incident rates were in grades 7 and 8.
8. Please note that a student may be suspended with more than one "code ". In terms of
categories/ codes, Code 6 (Conduct Injurious to the Moral tone of the school or the
Physical or Mental Well -Being of others in the school) represented 58.4 % of the reasons
for suspension. This category also involved the majority of the critical incidents reported.
9. For the Elementary Panel, of the 1,839 students suspended, 1,146 (62.32 %) were not
involved in subsequent suspensions.
10. There were 359 students suspended more than twice. This number represents 7/10 of
one - percent of our total population. Many of these students were served through our
Critical Incident Review Process.
11. Of the 1,839 students suspended, 406 (22 %) were reported as exceptional by the schools.
133 Greenbank Road Nepean. Ontario K2H 6L3
Social Work Department, Tower A. Room 305 Phone: (613) 596 -8265 Fax: (613) 820 -6968
OTTAWA CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Appendix B
Secondary Summary
1. All secondary schools reported suspensions
2. Of the 28,039 students, 2,158 students were suspended during the reporting period. This
represents 7.7% of the population.
3. For the 28,039 students there were 190 instructional days in the reporting period for a
potential total of 5,327,410 gross student instructional days.
4. The 2,158 suspended students were absent for 10,434.5 instructional days.
5. These lost instructional days represent 0.2 % of the total instructional days.
6. The highest incident rates were in grades 9 and 10.
7. Please note that a student may be suspended with more than one "code ". In terms of
categories/ codes, Code 6 (Conduct Injurious to the Moral tone of the school or the
Physical or Mental Well -Being of others in the school) represented 44.9 % of the reasons
for suspension. This category also involved the majority of the critical incidents reported.
8. For the Secondary Panel, of the 2,158 students suspended, 1,445 (67 %) were not
involved in subsequent suspensions.
9. There were 341 students suspended more than twice. This number represents 1.2% of
our total secondary population. Many of these students were served through our Critical
Incident Review Process.
10. Of the 2,158 students suspended, 100 (4.6 %) were reported as exceptional by the
schools.
133 Ch=nbank Road Neoean. Ontario K2H 6L3
Social Work Department, Tower A. Room 305 Phone: (613) 596 -8265 Fax: (613) 820 -6968
r r
[a
Appe ndix C
OCDSB suspension Report Se t'99 to Jun '00
Code 1: Truancy
Code 3: Neglect of Duty
Code 5: Willful Destruction
Elementary Panel Schools with 6 or more students suspended
Code 2: Oppostion
to Authority
Code 4: Profanity
Code 6: Conduct Injurious to Moral Tone
Schools
pe
Population'
Students
% of Pop
Transfer'
Male
Female
1X
2X
3X+
Suspensions
Total Days
Average
Code 1
Code 2
Code 3
Code 4
Code 5
Code 6
Days
Agincourt
JK6
620
10
1.60/.
1
10
0
8
2
1
15
32.0
2.1
0
0
0
0
0
15
Alta Vista
JK8
573
18
3.1%
1
14
4
10
3
4
44
113.0
2.6
0
24
1
3
0
41
Arch
JK6
332
15
4.5%
1
10
5
1 12
2
2
23
42.0
1.8
0
0
1 0
3
0
20
Bell's Corners
JK5
501
1 33
6.6%
29
4
22
6
5
53
85.0
1.6
0
6
1
2
1
51
Blossom Park
JK8
379
28
7.4 %
2
24
4
20
2
4
41
134.0
3.3
0
3
11
5
1
25
Bridlewood
JK8
613
40
6.5%
36
4
19
7
14
1 109
198.5
1.8
0
41
41
37
0
50
Broadview
JK8
736
q 33
4.5%
6
26
7
19
5
12
115
213.0
1.9
0
53
6
49
5
90
Carleton Heights
JK8
2831
32
1 11.3%
1 2
27
5
21
6
5
54
130.0
2.4
0
13
7
13
4
36
Carson Grove
JK5
470
12
1 2.6%
1
8
4
9
3
15
1 22.0
1.5
0
0
0
1
0
14
Castiefrank
JK6
5731
7
1 1.2%
1
1 7
0
5
1
1
10
35.0
3.5
0
0
5
1
0
9
Cedarview
Mid 6 -8
8101
53
1 6.5%
1
46
7
30
11
12
102
185.0
1.8
0
12
0
9
0
93
Centennial
JK6
271
7
2.6%
6
1
6
1
8
13.5
1.7
0
2
0
0
0
1 7
Century
JK6
497
13
2.6%
10
3
9
3
t
1 20
34.0
1.7
0
4
0
0
0
16
Charles Hulse
JK6
552
14
2.5%
11
3
11
1
2
19
33.5
1.8
0
0
0
1
0
18
Connaught
JK6
358
15
4.2%
1
14
1
8
5
1
21
32.0
1.5
0
1
0
2
2
18
D. Aubrey Moodie
Mid 6 -8
521
24
4.6%
1
23
1
21
2
2
31
79.0
2.5
0
7
0
4
1
26
D. Roy Kenned
JK8
60911
30
4.9%
20
10
15
7
8
67
115.0
1.7
1
5
3
24
2
32
Dunnin - Foubert
JK8
56011
23
4.1%
17
6
15
5
3
35
11 55.5
1.61
0
4
8
7
7
21
Elizabeth Park
JK8
312
H 21
6.7%
1
21
0
11 12
5
5
40
1 143.5
3.61
0
3
1
3
1
34
Emily Carr
Mid 7 -8
471
18
3.80/o
2
7
11
13
2
4
36
71.0
2.0
1
21
1
10
0
26
Fallin brook
JK8
632
15
2.4%
13
2
9
3
3
24
51.0
2.1
0
6
0
1 5
0
14
Featherston
JK8
580
25
4.3%
18
7
24
1
26
55.0
2.1
0
2
0
3
0
21
Fielding
Mid 4 -8
605
40
6.6%
2
11 31
9
24
9
9
83
179.0
2.2
0
1 23
2
7
0
64
First Place
ALT
50
15
1 30.0%
1 2
8
7
8
3
4
29
71.0
2.4
0
18
2
2
0
1 8
Fisher Park
Mid 7 -8
511
83
16.2%
2
60
23
46
16
21
180
355.0
2.0
0
33
2
50
1
107
Fitzroy Centennial
JK8
36111
9
2.5%
8
1
1 5
1 2
2
17
42.0
2.5
0
7
0
1
0
11
General Vanier
JK5
20511
6
2.9%
1
3
3
3
0
2
12
1 18.5
1.5
0
8
1 1
3
0
8
Glashan
Mid 7 -8
385
35
9.1%
28
7
18
11
6
64
1 161.0
2.51
0
7
0
20
0
50
Glen Cairn
JK6
404
6
1.5%
6
0
4
1
1
9
1 20.0
2.21
0
1
0
2
0
8
Glen Ogilvie
JK5
615
8
1.3%
8
0
5
2
1
12
1 14.0
1.21
0
7
4
8
0
8
Goulbourn
Mid 6 -8
450
11
1 2.4%
1
11
0
10
2
14
1 34.5
2.51
0
1 7
2
2
1
6
Grant
ALT
253
11
4.3%
10
1
7
3
1
18
19.5
1.1
0
3
3
1
0
17
Greel
JK6
315
14
4.4%
1
14
0
6
2
5
36
70.5
2.0
0
8
0
6
3
27
Greenbank
Mid 7 -8
486
42
8.6%
1
26
16
27
9
5
61
138.0
2.3
0
3
0
0
0
59
Hawthorne
JK8
5751
60
10.4%
2
49
11
36
11
15
137
192.3
1.4
0
7
1
20
6
123
Henry Larsen
JK8
5641
12
2.1%
1
7
5
11
1
1
1 16
40.5
2.5
0
3
0
1
1
12
Henry Munro
Mid 6 -8
587
64
10.9%
2
40
24
30
17
17
143
329.5
2.3
0
1
0
7
0
137
Hilson
JK6
222
13
5.9%
11
2
8
2
3
27
49.5
1.8
0
16
2
10
1
23
Hopewell
JK8
760
27
3.6%
23
4
19
5
3
40
96.0
2.4
0
8
0
2
3
37
Huntley Centennial
JK8
542
12
2.2%
11
1
11
1
13
38.01
2.9
0
0
0
0
1 0
13
J.H. Putman
Mid 7 -8
977
41
18.1%
11
28
13
19
1 8
14
91
11 151.51
1.7
0
1 8
1 2
7 1
0
48
V
Sir Winston Churchill
Mid 7 -8
6160
33
11 5.4%
11
j 30 1
3
11 25 1
3
1 5 11
54
11 179.01
2.1
1
0
1 11
1 13 1
8 1
2
35
Ter Fox
JK8
608
18
3.0%
1
15
3
8
3
6
41
67.0
0
1.6
0
18
3
3
3
22
Trillium
JK8
629
11
1.7%
3
11
0
8
2
1
17
24.0
13
1.4
0
3
7
1
0
13
Vincent massey
JK8 I
fZu
36
11 5.0% 11
1
29 1
/
Z3
4 1
8
1 72 11
149.5
2.1
1
1 28
35
16
5
1 59
W. E. Gowling
JK6
491
29
5.9%
3
28
1
20
4
6
50
118.5
2.4
0
17
2
36
W. Erskin Johnston
JK8
653
25
3.8%
1
22
3
20
1
3
33
123.5
3.7
0
13
0
15
W. O. Mitchell
JK8
738
6
0.8%
5
1
5
1
7
21.0
3.0
0
1
0
7
oodroffe PS
JK6
450
10
2.2%
10
0
8
1
1
15
26.5
1.8
0
0
0
15
York
JK8
305
43
14.1%
1
26
17
26
9
9
87
188.5
2.2
6
22
EO6
1
61
Schools: 6 or more Suspensions
36093
1765
4.89%
1407
358
1096
320
350
3398
7146.25
2.04
13
919
0
66
2571
Schools: 5 or Fewer Suspensions
15411 i
74
0.48%
1
71
3
50
14
9
118
226.75
2.04 1
0
34 1
3 1
17
1 2
100
(Transfer refers to Students who have been suspended in two or more schools. e.g. a student suspended twice at Broadview and twice at Pinecrest)
"Population as oer the- "'4mentary School September Report, 1999, Ministry Report # 19 -2781 (10/99) elementary I
r r
Xp--pendix
OCDSB Sus enSIon Report S8 t'99 to Jun '00
Code 1: Truancy
Code 3: Neglect of Duty
Code 5: Willful Destruction
Secondary Panel
Code 2: Oppostion to Authority
Code 4: Profanity
Code 6: Conduct Injurious to Moral Tone
Schools
Type
Population
Students
% of Pop
Transfer*
Male
Female
1X
2X
3X+
Suspensions
Total Days
Averse
Code 1
Code 2
Code 3
Code 4
Code 5
Code 6
See Note "
See Note
Y. Jackson SS
9 -OAC
896
93
10.4%
2
64
29
59
22
10
143
257
1.8
38
32
62
20
2
52
dult HS
ADU
1050
-
0.5%
-
-
-
23
3.8
Bell HS
9 -OAC
1294
69
5.3%
2
48
21
51
11
9
123
217
1.8
11
49
7
14
1
52
Brookfield HS
9 -OAC
1178
74
6.3%
1
54
20
51
14
10
126
301
2.4
31
40
39
28
0
57
Cairine Wilson SS
9 -OAC
640
89
13.9%
1
48
41
58
11
19
155
455
2.9
7
50
38
12
1
78
Canterbury HS
9 -OAC
1224
55
4.5%
1
32
23
39
6
9
90
234.5
2.6
21
1 3
35
9
0
37
Colonel By SS
9 -OAC
1134
64
5.6%
51
13
49
10
5
89
196
2.2
21
1 6
20
10
0
42
Earl of March SS
9 -OAC
1122
80
7.1%
3
64
16
47
18
16
1 146
467.5
23
38
18
18
4
80
Elizabeth n Wood
ALT
288
30
10.4%
2
20
10
21
5
2
27
219.5
0
2
3
6
1
33
Frederick Bantin
ALT
229
12
5.2%
8
4
10
2
3
67
0
0
0
0
0
14
Glebe CI
9 -OAC
1333
36
2.7%
2
30
6
28
5
3
50
153
12A
3
3
18
0
0
28
Gloucester HS
9 -OAC
1501
127
8.5%
1
99
28
89
21
18
233
713.5
3
101
26
44
0
116
Hillcrest HS
9 -OAC
1223
89
7.3%
2
70
19
74
13
4
112
273.5
9
15
8
1
1
81
J. S. Woodsworth SS
9 -OAC
760
73
9.6%
1
55
18
52
11
9
108
318.5
2.9
1
23
48
16
1
59
John McCrae SS
9 -OAC
1030
39
3.8%
2
35
4
25
9
5
60
164
2.7
1 12
1 13
2
7
0
1 31
Laurentian HS
9 -OAC
752
112
14.9%
3
93
19
79
19
13
162
636
3.9
4
18
1
24
4
141
Lis gar CI
9 -OAC
1119
11
1.0%
11
0
6
3
2
22
78
3.5
3
3
1
0
1
17
McArthur HS
9 -12 Voc
311
47
15.1%
4
37
10
31
7
6
74
316
4.3
0
25
4
36
1
31
Merivale HS
9 -OAC
1244
73
5.9%
1
53
20
61
10
3
91
293
3.2
7
18
41
11
0
27
Ne can HS
9 -OAC
1223
54
4.4%
1
41
13
48
1 5
2
64
139
2.2
6
6
26
4
1
33
Norman Johnston
ALT
136
11
8.1%
11
0
11
10
43
3.9
0
1
0
0
0
10
Os node Township HS
9 -OAC
691
38
5.5%
36
2
20
11
7
72
142.5
2.0
0
15
16
4
0
49
Richard Pfaff
ALT
212
-
1.9%
-
-
16
4.0
Rideau HS
9 -OAC
735
89
12.1%
1
68
21
58
19
13
139
509
3.6
4
24
30
18
1
96
Rid emont HS
9 -OAC
690
77
11.2%
1
60
17
48
15
15
140
517.5
3.7
22
43
24
43
0
91
Sir Guy Carleton SS
9 -12 Voc
493
190
38.5%
143
47
92
37
61
453
1357
3.0
1 23
98
119
1 33
4
184
Sir Robert Borden HS
9 -OAC
1176
105
8.9%
1
76
29
72
18
1 14
164
418
2.5
3
23
19
16
1
109
Sir Wilfrid Laurier SS
9 -OAC
1376
71
5.2%
1
54
17
58
10
2
90
254.5
2.8
7
1 17
12
11
1
57
South Carleton SS
9 -OAC
1420
85
6.0%
68
17
59
14
12
143
384.5
2.7
11
36
3
30
0
77
West Carleton SS
9 -OAC
781
163
20.9%
2
1 118
45
82
28
55
406
7271
1.8
1
58
133
48
3
198
oodroffe HS
9 -OAC
778
93
12.0%
2
75
18
58
18
17
182
543.5
3.0
24
77
13
47
3
100
Totals Schools SubmittIn
28039
2158
7.7%
37
1629
529
1445
372
341
3685
10434.5
3.1
295
837
786
511
31
1988
7.7%
75.5%
24.5% 167.0%117.2%115.8%
6.7%
18.9%
17.3%111.6%
0.7%
44.9%
of Total Population
of those students supsended
% of Total Codes
• (Transfer refers to Students who have been suspended in two or more schools. e.g. a student suspended twice at Broadview and twice at Pinecrest)
-Population as per the Secondary School September Report, 1999, Minist Report # 19 -2782 LRev 09/99)
Elementary Panel Schools with 5 or Fewer Students Suspended
A. Lorne Cassidy
Christie
I
Dunlop
Jockvale
Le Phare
North Gower
Riverview PS
Barrhaven
Churchill
EI in
Kars
Leslie Park
Orleans Wood
Stephen Leacock
Bayview
Clifford Bowe
Elmdale
Katimavik
Manotick
Os oode
Stittsville
Ba shore
Convent Glen
First Avenue
Lady Evelyn
Ma Hone well
Parkwood Hills
Stonecrest
Briar green
Crystal Bay
Fitzroy Harbour
Lakeview
Merivale PS
Pleasant Park
Summit Alternative
Cambridge
I Devonshire
Forest Valley
Lamira Dow Billings
Munster
Richmond
Torbolton
Castor Valley
Viscount Alexander
Seconda Panel Schools with 5 or Fewer Students Suspended
Adult H.S.
Richard Pfaff
I ILM
(W OTTAWA CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
141
IM
Appendix -D
Summary of OCDSB School Suspensions
Sept. 1999 to Jun. 2000
Elementary Panel
3516
Male Female
2881 635
7225
Suspensions/
Incidents
Secondary Panel
3709
Male Female
2924 785
Summary of Students Suspended
Sept. 1999 to Jun. 2000
September 7. 2000
5�0 .
3997 Students
Responsible for 7225
Suspensions
Elementary Panel
Secondary Panel
1839
2158
Male
Female
Male
Female
1478
361
1629
529
1 X 908
238
1052
393
2 X 274
60
297
75
3 xs+ 296
63
280
61
September 7. 2000
5�0 .
Appendix D (coned)
Number of Suspensions Presented to an "Appeals Hearing Panel'
Type
Number
Decision
K -6
1
Pending
Mid 6 -8
1
Upheld
Mid 7 -8
2
Upheld
K -8
2
Upheld
9 -OAC
3
Upheld
Total 9
OTIAWA-CARLETON
DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD
Appendix E
Comparison of Year on Year
Suspensions
1998 -1998 and 1999 -2000
133 Greenbank Road. Neo_ can. Ontario K2H 6L3
Social Work Department, Tower A, Room 305 Phone: (613) 596 -8265 Fax: (613) 820 -6 %8
1998 -1999
1999 -2000
% Increase
Suspensions Total
4,827
7,225
49.68%
Elementary
2319 (48 %)*
3516 (48.6 %)
51.61%
Secondary
2508(52%)
3709 (51.4 * /.)
47.88%
Students Suspended Total
2,935
3,997
36.18%
Elementary
1351 (46.o %)
1839 (46.0 %)
36.12%
Secondary
1,584 (54.00%)
2,158 (54.0%)
36.23 0.'0
Elementary Panel Total
1.351
1,839
36.12%
Male
1,118 (82.7 %)
1,478 (80.3 %)
32.20%
Female
233(17-3%)
361(19.7 %)
54.93%
1Xs
907 (67.1 %)
1,146 (623 %)
26.35%
2Xs
226(16.7%)
334 (18.2 %)
47.78%
3Xs+
218(16.2%)
359 (19.5 %)
43.60%
Secondary Panel Total
1984
2,158
36.23%
Male
1,236 (78.0 %)
1,629 (75.4 0%)
31.79%
Female
348(22.o%)
529 (24.6'0)
52.01%
1Xs
1,091 (68.9 0%)
1,445 (66.9 %)
2132%
2Xs
292 (18.4 %)
372 (172 %)
27.39%
3Xs+
201(12.68^/0)
341(15.8 %)
69.65%
( *denotes percentage of Total for section)
133 Greenbank Road. Neo_ can. Ontario K2H 6L3
Social Work Department, Tower A, Room 305 Phone: (613) 596 -8265 Fax: (613) 820 -6 %8