Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21 Report 98-266 Update on Process of Program Review73. C, Ottawa - Carleton District School Board This report is the original version. 27 July 1998 Report No. 98 -266 to the Board Re: Update on Process of Program Review ORIGINATORS: Barbara Stollery, Superintendent of Program and Information Technology PURPOSE: 1. To provide an update for trustees on the process which will provide a focus for the Program Review within the Ottawa - Carleton District School Board. BACKGROUND: 2. On June 151998, a report to Education Committee indicated that within the context of the Attendance Boundary /Area Review School Closure Process, there were a number of program factors and delivery models which need to be addressed in the total context of school board reorganization. This report also suggests that because there is extensive research and a number of community concerns in terms of program, that a process be developed to provide focus for the synthesis of the research information. Report No. 98 -247, approved by the Board on June 25,1998, recommended a process to focus the research and provide guidance to the Program Review; namely a) The researcher will attempt to interview trustees, senior staff and selected community representatives as suggested by the Ottawa- Carleton Assembly of School Councils; b) Topics will include: - French Immersion Entry Points; and - Elementary and Secondary Program Delivery Models including program entitlements, magnet schools, neighbourhood schools, families of schools and composite schools; c) The focus of the interviews were two questions around each topic; which would generate questions for focus: What does the decision -maker want /need to know? - What would the decision -maker do as a result of the information? d) Questions will not be selected or rejected on grounds of frequency only in terms of their being critical to decision- making. 5. This process has been completed over the past three weeks with the interviewer and a number of stakeholders as noted above. Within this timeframe, six trustees, seven senior staff and eight community members were interviewed to provide questions to focus the synthesis of the research. 6. The following broad -based areas have been identified by the interviewers: - Program Delivery Models; French Immersion Entry Points; Program Entitlements; Alternative Schools; Alternate Schools; Magnet Schools; Neighbourhood Schools; Composite Schools; - Special Education Delivery Models including Gifted Programming Specialized Programming; Middle Schools; and Semestering. Staff are in the process of sorting the questions within each category into a series of sub- categories which include in each area: - General Issues; - Pedagogical Issues; - Community and Social Issues; - Economic and Financial Issues; - Organizational Issues; and - Contractual Impacts. 8. Staff have begun to pull together the Board and external research to assist in the development of the decision making process around the following areas: - French Immersion Entry Points; - Alternative Elementary Schools; and - Elementary and Secondary Delivery Models including program entitlements, magnet schools, neighbourhood schools and composite schools. 9. On August 24,1998, a report will be brought forward to Board outlining a suggested process and timelines for the issues identified in the Program Review foundation process. This timeline will synchronize with the boundary/area review /school closure process and take into consideration the research which will be available as well as the time constraints of the Ministry of Education School Closure Process. 10. The suggested timeline will be staged taking into consideration issues which require specific consideration in the area review /school closure process. 11. Research reports on French Immersions Entry Points, Alternative schools, and Elementary/Secondary Delivery Models will be brought to the Board for consideration over the August 24 to September 151998, timeframe. 12. Community consultation and participation will be an integral part of the process. SUBMITTED FOR INFORMATION Stollery 'Superintendent of Program and Information Technology